What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account
This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Simon Smith [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch ; Französisch ; Italienisch ; Portugiesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Actes Sémiotiques - University of Limoges, 2024, (2022), 126 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2022 ; number:126 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.25965/as.7451 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ097174084 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ097174084 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413174218.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.25965/as.7451 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a spa |a fre |a ita |a por | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a P87-96 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Simon Smith |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a passion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a émotion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a interprétant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a autorité | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sentiment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hypothèse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a métatexte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a métaconversation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a compte en attente | |
| 650 | 4 | |a présentification | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Social Sciences | |
| 653 | 0 | |a H | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Communication. Mass media | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Actes Sémiotiques |d University of Limoges, 2024 |g (2022), 126 |w (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 |x 22704957 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2022 |g number:126 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2022 |e 126 | ||
| author_variant |
s s ss |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:22704957:2022----::hteenbtawsesohshitrrtvmtt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
P |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.25965/as.7451 doi (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa fre ita por P87-96 Simon Smith verfasserin aut What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media In Actes Sémiotiques University of Limoges, 2024 (2022), 126 (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 22704957 nnns year:2022 number:126 https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff kostenfrei https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 2022 126 |
| spelling |
10.25965/as.7451 doi (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa fre ita por P87-96 Simon Smith verfasserin aut What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media In Actes Sémiotiques University of Limoges, 2024 (2022), 126 (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 22704957 nnns year:2022 number:126 https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff kostenfrei https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 2022 126 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.25965/as.7451 doi (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa fre ita por P87-96 Simon Smith verfasserin aut What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media In Actes Sémiotiques University of Limoges, 2024 (2022), 126 (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 22704957 nnns year:2022 number:126 https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff kostenfrei https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 2022 126 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.25965/as.7451 doi (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa fre ita por P87-96 Simon Smith verfasserin aut What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media In Actes Sémiotiques University of Limoges, 2024 (2022), 126 (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 22704957 nnns year:2022 number:126 https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff kostenfrei https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 2022 126 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.25965/as.7451 doi (DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa fre ita por P87-96 Simon Smith verfasserin aut What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media In Actes Sémiotiques University of Limoges, 2024 (2022), 126 (DE-627)DOAJ090670884 22704957 nnns year:2022 number:126 https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff kostenfrei https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 2022 126 |
| language |
English Spanish French Italian Portuguese |
| source |
In Actes Sémiotiques (2022), 126 year:2022 number:126 |
| sourceStr |
In Actes Sémiotiques (2022), 126 year:2022 number:126 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification Social Sciences H Communication. Mass media |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Actes Sémiotiques |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Simon Smith @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ090670884 |
| id |
DOAJ097174084 |
| language_de |
englisch spanisch franzoesisch italienisch portugiesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ097174084</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413174218.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.25965/as.7451</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ097174084</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P87-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon Smith</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">passion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">émotion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interprétant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">autorité</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sentiment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hypothèse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métatexte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métaconversation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">compte en attente</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">présentification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication. Mass media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Actes Sémiotiques</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Limoges, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), 126</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090670884</subfield><subfield code="x">22704957</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">126</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
P - Language and Literature |
| author |
Simon Smith |
| spellingShingle |
Simon Smith misc P87-96 misc passion misc émotion misc interprétant misc autorité misc sentiment misc hypothèse misc métatexte misc métaconversation misc compte en attente misc présentification misc Social Sciences misc H misc Communication. Mass media What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| authorStr |
Simon Smith |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ090670884 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
P87-96 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
22704957 |
| topic_title |
P87-96 What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account passion émotion interprétant autorité sentiment hypothèse métatexte métaconversation compte en attente présentification |
| topic |
misc P87-96 misc passion misc émotion misc interprétant misc autorité misc sentiment misc hypothèse misc métatexte misc métaconversation misc compte en attente misc présentification misc Social Sciences misc H misc Communication. Mass media |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc P87-96 misc passion misc émotion misc interprétant misc autorité misc sentiment misc hypothèse misc métatexte misc métaconversation misc compte en attente misc présentification misc Social Sciences misc H misc Communication. Mass media |
| topic_browse |
misc P87-96 misc passion misc émotion misc interprétant misc autorité misc sentiment misc hypothèse misc métatexte misc métaconversation misc compte en attente misc présentification misc Social Sciences misc H misc Communication. Mass media |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Actes Sémiotiques |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ090670884 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Actes Sémiotiques |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ090670884 |
| title |
What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ097174084 (DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff |
| title_full |
What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| author_sort |
Simon Smith |
| journal |
Actes Sémiotiques |
| journalStr |
Actes Sémiotiques |
| callnumber-first-code |
P |
| lang_code |
eng spa fre ita por |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Simon Smith |
| class |
P87-96 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Simon Smith |
| doi_str_mv |
10.25965/as.7451 |
| title_sort |
what we meant by that was “let’s do this”. the interpretive metatext as pending account |
| callnumber |
P87-96 |
| title_auth |
What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| abstract |
This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. |
| abstractGer |
This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 |
| container_issue |
126 |
| title_short |
What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451 https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451 https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ090670884 |
| callnumber-subject |
P - Philology and Linguistics |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.25965/as.7451 |
| callnumber-a |
P87-96 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:05:18.418Z |
| _version_ |
1803604740977721344 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ097174084</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413174218.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.25965/as.7451</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ097174084</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield><subfield code="a">ita</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P87-96</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simon Smith</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What we meant by that was “let’s do this”. The interpretive metatext as pending account</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates the use of a semiotic macrostructure called a pending account as an interpretive metatext to configure strategy texts’ motivational affordances and lend authority to deontic claims. Interpretive metatexts tell us what another text means; if they use a pending account to do so, they tell us what it means by telling us what we should do; and they tell us what we should do by telling us what inclines us to act in a certain way, either by verbalizing habits or convoking scripts and passions. Pending accounting is a speech genre oriented towards inducing action. Peircean and Greimasian semiotics suggest two different ways in which emotion is coupled to other sensemaking registers to set up these inducements. If Peirce teaches us how feelings set off an effortful inquiry oriented towards the fixing of belief, Greimas explains how passions (as well as scripts) play an important part in sanctioning and thereby (de)commissioning action. The paper shows how the two semioticians can be combined to explain how emotion is used to articulate and authorize pending accounts, based on an illustrative analysis of four interpretations of the 2020 Brexit withdrawal agreement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">passion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">émotion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interprétant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">autorité</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sentiment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">hypothèse</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métatexte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métaconversation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">compte en attente</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">présentification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">H</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Communication. Mass media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Actes Sémiotiques</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Limoges, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">(2022), 126</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090670884</subfield><subfield code="x">22704957</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.25965/as.7451</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/27d75d9803d0494dbbdd3f4281874bff</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.unilim.fr/as/7451</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2270-4957</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">126</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.397874 |