Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia
Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehe...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Amir Shiani [verfasserIn] Mohammad Taghi Joghataei [verfasserIn] Hassan Ashayeri [verfasserIn] Mohammad Kamali [verfasserIn] Mohammad Reza Razavi [verfasserIn] Fariba Yadegari [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Basic and Clinical Neuroscience ; 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 ; year:2019 ; number:3 ; pages:199-208 |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ098482203 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ098482203 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413225045.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ098482203 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RC321-571 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Amir Shiani |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Sentence comprehension | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Complex sentences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Syntax | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aphasia | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mohammad Taghi Joghataei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Hassan Ashayeri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mohammad Kamali |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mohammad Reza Razavi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Fariba Yadegari |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |g 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g pages:199-208 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2019 |e 3 |h 199-208 | ||
| author_variant |
a s as m t j mtj h a ha m k mk m r r mrr f y fy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
amirshianimohammadtaghijoghataeihassanas:2019----:opeesoocmlxetneiteesasekn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Amir Shiani verfasserin aut Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Mohammad Taghi Joghataei verfasserin aut Hassan Ashayeri verfasserin aut Mohammad Kamali verfasserin aut Mohammad Reza Razavi verfasserin aut Fariba Yadegari verfasserin aut In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c kostenfrei http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2019 3 199-208 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Amir Shiani verfasserin aut Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Mohammad Taghi Joghataei verfasserin aut Hassan Ashayeri verfasserin aut Mohammad Kamali verfasserin aut Mohammad Reza Razavi verfasserin aut Fariba Yadegari verfasserin aut In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c kostenfrei http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2019 3 199-208 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Amir Shiani verfasserin aut Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Mohammad Taghi Joghataei verfasserin aut Hassan Ashayeri verfasserin aut Mohammad Kamali verfasserin aut Mohammad Reza Razavi verfasserin aut Fariba Yadegari verfasserin aut In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c kostenfrei http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2019 3 199-208 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Amir Shiani verfasserin aut Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Mohammad Taghi Joghataei verfasserin aut Hassan Ashayeri verfasserin aut Mohammad Kamali verfasserin aut Mohammad Reza Razavi verfasserin aut Fariba Yadegari verfasserin aut In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c kostenfrei http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2019 3 199-208 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Amir Shiani verfasserin aut Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Mohammad Taghi Joghataei verfasserin aut Hassan Ashayeri verfasserin aut Mohammad Kamali verfasserin aut Mohammad Reza Razavi verfasserin aut Fariba Yadegari verfasserin aut In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c kostenfrei http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2019 3 199-208 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 |
| sourceStr |
In Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208 volume:10 year:2019 number:3 pages:199-208 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Amir Shiani @@aut@@ Mohammad Taghi Joghataei @@aut@@ Hassan Ashayeri @@aut@@ Mohammad Kamali @@aut@@ Mohammad Reza Razavi @@aut@@ Fariba Yadegari @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| id |
DOAJ098482203 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ098482203</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413225045.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ098482203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amir Shiani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sentence comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complex sentences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Syntax</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aphasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Taghi Joghataei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hassan Ashayeri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Kamali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Razavi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fariba Yadegari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Basic and Clinical Neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:199-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">199-208</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Amir Shiani |
| spellingShingle |
Amir Shiani misc RC321-571 misc Sentence comprehension misc Complex sentences misc Syntax misc Aphasia misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| authorStr |
Amir Shiani |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RC321-571 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
RC321-571 Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia Sentence comprehension Complex sentences Syntax Aphasia |
| topic |
misc RC321-571 misc Sentence comprehension misc Complex sentences misc Syntax misc Aphasia misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RC321-571 misc Sentence comprehension misc Complex sentences misc Syntax misc Aphasia misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
| topic_browse |
misc RC321-571 misc Sentence comprehension misc Complex sentences misc Syntax misc Aphasia misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| title |
Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ098482203 (DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c |
| title_full |
Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| author_sort |
Amir Shiani |
| journal |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
| journalStr |
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
199 |
| author_browse |
Amir Shiani Mohammad Taghi Joghataei Hassan Ashayeri Mohammad Kamali Mohammad Reza Razavi Fariba Yadegari |
| container_volume |
10 |
| class |
RC321-571 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Amir Shiani |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
comprehension of complex sentences in the persian-speaking patients with aphasia |
| callnumber |
RC321-571 |
| title_auth |
Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| abstract |
Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. |
| abstractGer |
Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mohammad Taghi Joghataei Hassan Ashayeri Mohammad Kamali Mohammad Reza Razavi Fariba Yadegari |
| author2Str |
Mohammad Taghi Joghataei Hassan Ashayeri Mohammad Kamali Mohammad Reza Razavi Fariba Yadegari |
| callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
RC321-571 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:30:48.932Z |
| _version_ |
1803579921720672256 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ098482203</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240413225045.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240413s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ098482203</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amir Shiani</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comprehension of Complex Sentences in the Persian-Speaking Patients With Aphasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: To study sentence comprehension in Persian-speaking Patients with Aphasia considering the factors of complexity. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the performance of 6 non-fluent aphasic patients were tested and their performance was compared to 15 matched control group. Comprehension of semantically reversible sentences was assessed using a binary sentence-picture matching task. The stimuli were as follows: clefts; subject clefts and object clefts, also relative clauses; subject relatives and object relatives. All of them were types of movement-derived structures and also simple declarative sentences as the control task. Results: The best performance of aphasic patients were seen in the comprehension of subject clefts, although prior to this result we assumed that simple declarative sentences (in which there is no structural factor of complexity) can be understood easily. They showed the highest difficulty in the comprehension of object relatives. Furthermore, the performance of patients in the comprehension of relative clauses was significantly weaker than understanding the clefts. Conclusion: The outcomes of this study suggest that the sentence comprehension deficits of aphasic patients, in contrast to the specific deficit models, may not be related to linguistic disabilities. Moreover, the problems in the comprehension of non-canonical sentences may be related to failure in the allocation of attention. Finally, our results support the claims that neural characterization of the cognitive resources (e.g. working memory) is disrupted in sentence comprehension deficits.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sentence comprehension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Complex sentences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Syntax</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aphasia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Taghi Joghataei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hassan Ashayeri</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Kamali</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Reza Razavi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fariba Yadegari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Basic and Clinical Neuroscience</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2019), 3, Seite 199-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:199-208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/298e5c36213e4c48933ca6adf9b7365c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-841-en.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2008-126X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7442</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">199-208</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.403063 |