Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism
Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi [verfasserIn] Davood Hoseini [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Persisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: حکمت و فلسفه ; 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 ; year:2022 ; number:71 ; pages:103-126 |
|---|
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ099109689 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ099109689 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414013318.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240414s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a per | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a B1-5802 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Meysam Zandi Goharrizi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a ground | |
| 650 | 4 | |a grounding ground | |
| 650 | 4 | |a foundationalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a well-foundedness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a grounding essentialism | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Philosophy (General) | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Davood Hoseini |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t حکمت و فلسفه |g 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2022 |g number:71 |g pages:103-126 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2022 |e 71 |h 103-126 | ||
| author_variant |
m z g mzg d h dh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
meysamzandigoharrizidavoodhoseini:2022----:rudnesnilsadhcalnef |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
B |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 doi (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per B1-5802 Meysam Zandi Goharrizi verfasserin aut Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) Davood Hoseini verfasserin aut In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 kostenfrei https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 18 2022 71 103-126 |
| spelling |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 doi (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per B1-5802 Meysam Zandi Goharrizi verfasserin aut Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) Davood Hoseini verfasserin aut In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 kostenfrei https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 18 2022 71 103-126 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 doi (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per B1-5802 Meysam Zandi Goharrizi verfasserin aut Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) Davood Hoseini verfasserin aut In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 kostenfrei https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 18 2022 71 103-126 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 doi (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per B1-5802 Meysam Zandi Goharrizi verfasserin aut Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) Davood Hoseini verfasserin aut In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 kostenfrei https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 18 2022 71 103-126 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 doi (DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb per B1-5802 Meysam Zandi Goharrizi verfasserin aut Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) Davood Hoseini verfasserin aut In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 kostenfrei https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 18 2022 71 103-126 |
| language |
Persian |
| source |
In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 |
| sourceStr |
In حکمت و فلسفه 18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126 volume:18 year:2022 number:71 pages:103-126 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism Philosophy (General) |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
حکمت و فلسفه |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi @@aut@@ Davood Hoseini @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| id |
DOAJ099109689 |
| language_de |
persisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ099109689</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414013318.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ099109689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meysam Zandi Goharrizi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ground</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grounding ground</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">foundationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">well-foundedness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grounding essentialism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davood Hoseini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">حکمت و فلسفه</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:71</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">71</subfield><subfield code="h">103-126</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi |
| spellingShingle |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi misc B1-5802 misc ground misc grounding ground misc foundationalism misc well-foundedness misc grounding essentialism misc Philosophy (General) Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| authorStr |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
B1-5802 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
B1-5802 Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism ground grounding ground foundationalism well-foundedness grounding essentialism |
| topic |
misc B1-5802 misc ground misc grounding ground misc foundationalism misc well-foundedness misc grounding essentialism misc Philosophy (General) |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc B1-5802 misc ground misc grounding ground misc foundationalism misc well-foundedness misc grounding essentialism misc Philosophy (General) |
| topic_browse |
misc B1-5802 misc ground misc grounding ground misc foundationalism misc well-foundedness misc grounding essentialism misc Philosophy (General) |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
حکمت و فلسفه |
| hierarchy_top_title |
حکمت و فلسفه |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| title |
Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ099109689 (DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 |
| title_full |
Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| author_sort |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi |
| journal |
حکمت و فلسفه |
| journalStr |
حکمت و فلسفه |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
per |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
103 |
| author_browse |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi Davood Hoseini |
| container_volume |
18 |
| class |
B1-5802 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Meysam Zandi Goharrizi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
grounding essentialism and the challenge of foundationalism |
| callnumber |
B1-5802 |
| title_auth |
Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| abstract |
Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. |
| abstractGer |
Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
71 |
| title_short |
Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305 https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238 https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Davood Hoseini |
| author2Str |
Davood Hoseini |
| callnumber-subject |
B - Philosophy |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057 |
| callnumber-a |
B1-5802 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:03:18.024Z |
| _version_ |
1803593290116759552 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ099109689</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414013318.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||per c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ099109689</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">per</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B1-5802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Meysam Zandi Goharrizi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Grounding Essentialism and the Challenge of Foundationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grounding depicts the layered structure of the facts. If we let grounding facts be in the theory, what is their status in the hierarchy? Based on the Purity Principle, grounding facts could not be fundamental because they contain non-fundamental parts. They must inevitably be grounded in other facts. Non-fundamentality of grounding facts, with some other assumptions, produces a chain of grounding facts that could threaten the well-foundedness of grounding. The well-foundedness of Grounding is desirable because it guarantees foundationalism; a thesis that posits the existence of a fundamental layer of facts. In this essay, we will introduce common theories about grounding ground and also describe different approaches to make grounding well-founded. These theories contain a reductionist theory called Grounding Essentialism and two theories that believe grounding facts are grounded in something in the theory. These two accounts are called Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account. Here we will show that Straight Forward Account and Zero Grounding Account are consistent with one approach to well-foundedness and therefore, they are foundationalist. On the other hand, we will show that Grounding Essentialism cannot accommodate well-foundedness in its various forms. We present a qualified version of Grounding Essentialism that could support well-foundedness. We will argue that even though this trial is somehow successful, some problems still stay on.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ground</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grounding ground</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">foundationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">well-foundedness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grounding essentialism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davood Hoseini</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">حکمت و فلسفه</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2022), 71, Seite 103-126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:71</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:103-126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22054/wph.2022.66573.2057</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dc981935c57b475b8ea7272aadd28305</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_14833_20896f0beed3d77035a35898a2fb713f.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1735-3238</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6038</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">71</subfield><subfield code="h">103-126</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399865 |