Causality
Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology - St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023, (2023) |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2023 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ099256290 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ099256290 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414022533.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240414s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ099256290 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BT10-1480 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Michael J. Dodds O.P. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Causality |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a divine action | |
| 650 | 4 | |a emergence theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a top down/bottom up causality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a final cause | |
| 650 | 4 | |a formal cause | |
| 650 | 4 | |a efficient cause | |
| 650 | 4 | |a secondary causality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a miracles | |
| 650 | 4 | |a science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prayer | |
| 650 | 4 | |a thomas aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aristotle | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Doctrinal Theology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |d St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 |g (2023) |w (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 |x 27533492 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2023 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_148 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2023 | ||
| author_variant |
m j d o mjdo |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:27533492:2023----::asl |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2023 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BT |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BT10-1480 Michael J. Dodds O.P. verfasserin aut Causality 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 (2023) (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 27533492 nnns year:2023 https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 kostenfrei https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 AR 2023 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BT10-1480 Michael J. Dodds O.P. verfasserin aut Causality 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 (2023) (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 27533492 nnns year:2023 https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 kostenfrei https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 AR 2023 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BT10-1480 Michael J. Dodds O.P. verfasserin aut Causality 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 (2023) (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 27533492 nnns year:2023 https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 kostenfrei https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 AR 2023 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BT10-1480 Michael J. Dodds O.P. verfasserin aut Causality 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 (2023) (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 27533492 nnns year:2023 https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 kostenfrei https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 AR 2023 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BT10-1480 Michael J. Dodds O.P. verfasserin aut Causality 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023 (2023) (DE-627)DOAJ090667204 27533492 nnns year:2023 https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 kostenfrei https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 AR 2023 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology (2023) year:2023 |
| sourceStr |
In St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology (2023) year:2023 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle Doctrinal Theology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ090667204 |
| id |
DOAJ099256290 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ099256290</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414022533.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ099256290</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael J. Dodds O.P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">divine action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergence theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">top down/bottom up causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">final cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">formal cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">efficient cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">secondary causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">miracles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prayer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">thomas aquinas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology</subfield><subfield code="d">St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090667204</subfield><subfield code="x">27533492</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. |
| spellingShingle |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. misc BT10-1480 misc divine action misc emergence theory misc top down/bottom up causality misc final cause misc formal cause misc efficient cause misc secondary causality misc miracles misc science misc prayer misc thomas aquinas misc aristotle misc Doctrinal Theology Causality |
| authorStr |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ090667204 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BT10-1480 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
27533492 |
| topic_title |
BT10-1480 Causality divine action emergence theory top down/bottom up causality final cause formal cause efficient cause secondary causality miracles science prayer thomas aquinas aristotle |
| topic |
misc BT10-1480 misc divine action misc emergence theory misc top down/bottom up causality misc final cause misc formal cause misc efficient cause misc secondary causality misc miracles misc science misc prayer misc thomas aquinas misc aristotle misc Doctrinal Theology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BT10-1480 misc divine action misc emergence theory misc top down/bottom up causality misc final cause misc formal cause misc efficient cause misc secondary causality misc miracles misc science misc prayer misc thomas aquinas misc aristotle misc Doctrinal Theology |
| topic_browse |
misc BT10-1480 misc divine action misc emergence theory misc top down/bottom up causality misc final cause misc formal cause misc efficient cause misc secondary causality misc miracles misc science misc prayer misc thomas aquinas misc aristotle misc Doctrinal Theology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ090667204 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ090667204 |
| title |
Causality |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ099256290 (DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 |
| title_full |
Causality |
| author_sort |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. |
| journal |
St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |
| journalStr |
St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2023 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. |
| class |
BT10-1480 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Michael J. Dodds O.P. |
| title_sort |
causality |
| callnumber |
BT10-1480 |
| title_auth |
Causality |
| abstract |
Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. |
| abstractGer |
Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_148 |
| title_short |
Causality |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759 https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ090667204 |
| callnumber-subject |
BT - Doctrinal Theology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
BT10-1480 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:53:15.680Z |
| _version_ |
1803596433385848832 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ099256290</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414022533.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ099256290</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BT10-1480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael J. Dodds O.P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Causality is not only a central concept in philosophy and theology but also a basic aspect of human thought and speech. Causal words such as ‘making’, ‘doing’, ‘producing’, and so on, are in constant use. Philosophers have been discussing causality ever since philosophy began. Theologians require a notion of causality to speak of God’s action in the creation and governance of the world. This article will first provide a brief review of the history of the idea of causality in Western thought and then consider how our understanding of that idea has influenced the discussion of God’s action. Western thought may be divided historically into two basic parts: classical/medieval and modern/contemporary. Although there is no strict dividing line, the Scientific Revolution may be taken as a marker. This division agrees with Menno Hulswit’s observation that ‘two decisive milestones mark the history of causality: the Aristotelian (-scholastic) Conception (I), and the Scientific Conception (II)’ (Hulswit 2004: 6). In the first period, the article will concentrate especially on the thought of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas who present the most developed notion of causality. In the second period, it will consider how the understanding of causality was influenced by the rise of modern science (see The History of Science and Theology). The article will show how the broad, classical understanding of causality narrowed with the advent of modern science but is now expanding again through the discoveries of contemporary science. It will then consider how the fortunes of the concept of causality have affected the discussion of divine action. In that context, it will take particular note of the understanding of God’s causality in scripture, prayer, and miracles.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">divine action</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergence theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">top down/bottom up causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">final cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">formal cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">efficient cause</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">secondary causality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">miracles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prayer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">thomas aquinas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Doctrinal Theology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology</subfield><subfield code="d">St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology, 2023</subfield><subfield code="g">(2023)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090667204</subfield><subfield code="x">27533492</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/11487659aaec4c9985442ff738459759</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Causality</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2753-3492</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2023</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399004 |