Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study

Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Grazzini S [verfasserIn] Conticini E [verfasserIn] Falsetti P [verfasserIn] D'Alessandro M [verfasserIn] Sota J [verfasserIn] Terribili R [verfasserIn] Baldi C [verfasserIn] Fabiani C [verfasserIn] Bargagli E [verfasserIn] Cantarini L [verfasserIn] Frediani B [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Biologics: Targets & Therapy - Dove Medical Press, 2009, (2023), Seite 151-160
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2023 ; pages:151-160

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ100182542

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ100182542
003	DE-627
005	20240414070736.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240414s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ100182542
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a R5-920
100	0		\|a Grazzini S \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis
650		4	\|a gca
650		4	\|a giant cell arteritis
650		4	\|a methotrexate
650		4	\|a tocilizumab
650		4	\|a ultraonography
650		4	\|a vasculitis.
653		0	\|a Medicine (General)
700	0		\|a Conticini E \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Falsetti P \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a D'Alessandro M \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Sota J \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Terribili R \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Baldi C \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Fabiani C \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Bargagli E \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Cantarini L \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Frediani B \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Biologics: Targets & Therapy \|d Dove Medical Press, 2009 \|g (2023), Seite 151-160 \|w (DE-627)560177038 \|w (DE-600)2415708-9 \|x 11775491 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2023 \|g pages:151-160
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2023 \|h 151-160

Indexfelder

author_variant	g s gs c e ce f p fp d m dm s j sj t r tr b c bc f c fc b e be c l cl f b fb
matchkey_str	article:11775491:2023----::oiiuavmtorxtiaootfainsfetdyciecaoprtvci
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2023
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Grazzini S verfasserin aut Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General) Conticini E verfasserin aut Falsetti P verfasserin aut D'Alessandro M verfasserin aut Sota J verfasserin aut Terribili R verfasserin aut Baldi C verfasserin aut Fabiani C verfasserin aut Bargagli E verfasserin aut Cantarini L verfasserin aut Frediani B verfasserin aut In Biologics: Targets & Therapy Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2023), Seite 151-160 (DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9 11775491 nnns year:2023 pages:151-160 https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2023 151-160
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Grazzini S verfasserin aut Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General) Conticini E verfasserin aut Falsetti P verfasserin aut D'Alessandro M verfasserin aut Sota J verfasserin aut Terribili R verfasserin aut Baldi C verfasserin aut Fabiani C verfasserin aut Bargagli E verfasserin aut Cantarini L verfasserin aut Frediani B verfasserin aut In Biologics: Targets & Therapy Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2023), Seite 151-160 (DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9 11775491 nnns year:2023 pages:151-160 https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2023 151-160
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Grazzini S verfasserin aut Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General) Conticini E verfasserin aut Falsetti P verfasserin aut D'Alessandro M verfasserin aut Sota J verfasserin aut Terribili R verfasserin aut Baldi C verfasserin aut Fabiani C verfasserin aut Bargagli E verfasserin aut Cantarini L verfasserin aut Frediani B verfasserin aut In Biologics: Targets & Therapy Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2023), Seite 151-160 (DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9 11775491 nnns year:2023 pages:151-160 https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2023 151-160
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Grazzini S verfasserin aut Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General) Conticini E verfasserin aut Falsetti P verfasserin aut D'Alessandro M verfasserin aut Sota J verfasserin aut Terribili R verfasserin aut Baldi C verfasserin aut Fabiani C verfasserin aut Bargagli E verfasserin aut Cantarini L verfasserin aut Frediani B verfasserin aut In Biologics: Targets & Therapy Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2023), Seite 151-160 (DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9 11775491 nnns year:2023 pages:151-160 https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2023 151-160
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Grazzini S verfasserin aut Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study 2023 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General) Conticini E verfasserin aut Falsetti P verfasserin aut D'Alessandro M verfasserin aut Sota J verfasserin aut Terribili R verfasserin aut Baldi C verfasserin aut Fabiani C verfasserin aut Bargagli E verfasserin aut Cantarini L verfasserin aut Frediani B verfasserin aut In Biologics: Targets & Therapy Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2023), Seite 151-160 (DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9 11775491 nnns year:2023 pages:151-160 https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2023 151-160
language	English
source	In Biologics: Targets & Therapy (2023), Seite 151-160 year:2023 pages:151-160
sourceStr	In Biologics: Targets & Therapy (2023), Seite 151-160 year:2023 pages:151-160
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis. Medicine (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Biologics: Targets & Therapy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Grazzini S @@aut@@ Conticini E @@aut@@ Falsetti P @@aut@@ D'Alessandro M @@aut@@ Sota J @@aut@@ Terribili R @@aut@@ Baldi C @@aut@@ Fabiani C @@aut@@ Bargagli E @@aut@@ Cantarini L @@aut@@ Frediani B @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	560177038
id	DOAJ100182542
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100182542</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414070736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100182542</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grazzini S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">gca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">giant cell arteritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methotrexate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tocilizumab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultraonography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vasculitis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Conticini E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Falsetti P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D'Alessandro M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sota J</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Terribili R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baldi C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fabiani C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bargagli E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cantarini L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frediani B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Biologics: Targets & Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2023), Seite 151-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)560177038</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2415708-9</subfield><subfield code="x">11775491</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:151-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">151-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Grazzini S
spellingShingle	Grazzini S misc R5-920 misc gca misc giant cell arteritis misc methotrexate misc tocilizumab misc ultraonography misc vasculitis. misc Medicine (General) Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
authorStr	Grazzini S
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)560177038
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R5-920
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	11775491
topic_title	R5-920 Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study gca giant cell arteritis methotrexate tocilizumab ultraonography vasculitis
topic	misc R5-920 misc gca misc giant cell arteritis misc methotrexate misc tocilizumab misc ultraonography misc vasculitis. misc Medicine (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc R5-920 misc gca misc giant cell arteritis misc methotrexate misc tocilizumab misc ultraonography misc vasculitis. misc Medicine (General)
topic_browse	misc R5-920 misc gca misc giant cell arteritis misc methotrexate misc tocilizumab misc ultraonography misc vasculitis. misc Medicine (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Biologics: Targets & Therapy
hierarchy_parent_id	560177038
hierarchy_top_title	Biologics: Targets & Therapy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)560177038 (DE-600)2415708-9
title	Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ100182542 (DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7
title_full	Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
author_sort	Grazzini S
journal	Biologics: Targets & Therapy
journalStr	Biologics: Targets & Therapy
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	151
author_browse	Grazzini S Conticini E Falsetti P D'Alessandro M Sota J Terribili R Baldi C Fabiani C Bargagli E Cantarini L Frediani B
class	R5-920
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Grazzini S
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	tocilizumab vs methotrexate in a cohort of patients affected by active gca: a comparative clinical and ultrasonographic study
callnumber	R5-920
title_auth	Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
abstract	Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis
abstractGer	Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis
abstract_unstemmed	Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
url	https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7 https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491
remote_bool	true
author2	Conticini E Falsetti P D'Alessandro M Sota J Terribili R Baldi C Fabiani C Bargagli E Cantarini L Frediani B
author2Str	Conticini E Falsetti P D'Alessandro M Sota J Terribili R Baldi C Fabiani C Bargagli E Cantarini L Frediani B
ppnlink	560177038
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	R5-920
up_date	2024-07-04T01:52:09.095Z
_version_	1803611463061864448
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100182542</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414070736.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100182542</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grazzini S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Silvia Grazzini,1,&ast; Edoardo Conticini,1,&ast; Paolo Falsetti,1 Miriana D’Alessandro,2 Jurgen Sota,1 Riccardo Terribili,1 Caterina Baldi,1 Claudia Fabiani,3 Elena Bargagli,2 Luca Cantarini,1 Bruno Frediani1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 2Respiratory Diseases and Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; 3Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Edoardo Conticini, Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, AOUS Le Scotte, viale Mario Bracci 14, Siena, 53100, Italy, Email conticini.edoardogmail.comIntroduction: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids.Methods: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months.Results: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported.Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.Keywords: GCA, giant cell arteritis, methotrexate, tocilizumab, ultrasonography, vasculitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">gca</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">giant cell arteritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">methotrexate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">tocilizumab</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ultraonography</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">vasculitis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Conticini E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Falsetti P</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">D'Alessandro M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sota J</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Terribili R</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baldi C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fabiani C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bargagli E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cantarini L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Frediani B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Biologics: Targets & Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2023), Seite 151-160</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)560177038</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2415708-9</subfield><subfield code="x">11775491</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2023</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:151-160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1a37baf33872429ea3414cdc465df3e7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/tocilizumab-vs-methotrexate-in-a-cohort-of-patients-affected-by-active-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-BTT</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5491</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2023</subfield><subfield code="h">151-160</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398506

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?