The just war theory and international law
The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance wit...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jovanović Miloš [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; srp |
| Erschienen: |
2007 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Međunarodni Problemi - Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024, 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:59 ; year:2007 ; number:2-3 ; pages:243-265 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ100391370 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ100391370 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414092651.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240414s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2298/MEDJP0703243J |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a srp | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BL1-2790 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a K7000-7720 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a JZ2-6530 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Jovanović Miloš |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The just war theory and international law |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a just war theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a natural law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a positive law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a jus ad bellum | |
| 650 | 4 | |a public international law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a use of force | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legitimacy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a UN | |
| 650 | 4 | |a aggression | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legitimate defence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a humanitarian intervention | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Religions. Mythology. Rationalism | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Private international law. Conflict of laws | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International relations | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Međunarodni Problemi |d Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 |g 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 |w (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 |x 24060690 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2007 |g number:2-3 |g pages:243-265 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 59 |j 2007 |e 2-3 |h 243-265 | ||
| author_variant |
j m jm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24060690:2007----::hjswrhoynitr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2007 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BL |
| publishDate |
2007 |
| allfields |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J doi (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 Jovanović Miloš verfasserin aut The just war theory and international law 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations In Međunarodni Problemi Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 24060690 nnns volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 59 2007 2-3 243-265 |
| spelling |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J doi (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 Jovanović Miloš verfasserin aut The just war theory and international law 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations In Međunarodni Problemi Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 24060690 nnns volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 59 2007 2-3 243-265 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J doi (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 Jovanović Miloš verfasserin aut The just war theory and international law 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations In Međunarodni Problemi Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 24060690 nnns volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 59 2007 2-3 243-265 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J doi (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 Jovanović Miloš verfasserin aut The just war theory and international law 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations In Međunarodni Problemi Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 24060690 nnns volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 59 2007 2-3 243-265 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J doi (DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 Jovanović Miloš verfasserin aut The just war theory and international law 2007 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations In Međunarodni Problemi Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 (DE-627)DOAJ090664523 24060690 nnns volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 AR 59 2007 2-3 243-265 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Međunarodni Problemi 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 |
| sourceStr |
In Međunarodni Problemi 59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265 volume:59 year:2007 number:2-3 pages:243-265 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention Religions. Mythology. Rationalism Private international law. Conflict of laws International relations |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Međunarodni Problemi |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jovanović Miloš @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
DOAJ090664523 |
| id |
DOAJ100391370 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100391370</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414092651.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/MEDJP0703243J</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100391370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BL1-2790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7000-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jovanović Miloš</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The just war theory and international law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">just war theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">jus ad bellum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public international law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legitimacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aggression</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legitimate defence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">humanitarian intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Religions. Mythology. Rationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Private international law. Conflict of laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Međunarodni Problemi</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090664523</subfield><subfield code="x">24060690</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:243-265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">243-265</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Jovanović Miloš |
| spellingShingle |
Jovanović Miloš misc BL1-2790 misc K7000-7720 misc JZ2-6530 misc just war theory misc natural law misc positive law misc jus ad bellum misc public international law misc use of force misc legality misc legitimacy misc UN misc aggression misc legitimate defence misc humanitarian intervention misc Religions. Mythology. Rationalism misc Private international law. Conflict of laws misc International relations The just war theory and international law |
| authorStr |
Jovanović Miloš |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)DOAJ090664523 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BL1-2790 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24060690 |
| topic_title |
BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 The just war theory and international law just war theory natural law positive law jus ad bellum public international law use of force legality legitimacy UN aggression legitimate defence humanitarian intervention |
| topic |
misc BL1-2790 misc K7000-7720 misc JZ2-6530 misc just war theory misc natural law misc positive law misc jus ad bellum misc public international law misc use of force misc legality misc legitimacy misc UN misc aggression misc legitimate defence misc humanitarian intervention misc Religions. Mythology. Rationalism misc Private international law. Conflict of laws misc International relations |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BL1-2790 misc K7000-7720 misc JZ2-6530 misc just war theory misc natural law misc positive law misc jus ad bellum misc public international law misc use of force misc legality misc legitimacy misc UN misc aggression misc legitimate defence misc humanitarian intervention misc Religions. Mythology. Rationalism misc Private international law. Conflict of laws misc International relations |
| topic_browse |
misc BL1-2790 misc K7000-7720 misc JZ2-6530 misc just war theory misc natural law misc positive law misc jus ad bellum misc public international law misc use of force misc legality misc legitimacy misc UN misc aggression misc legitimate defence misc humanitarian intervention misc Religions. Mythology. Rationalism misc Private international law. Conflict of laws misc International relations |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Međunarodni Problemi |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
DOAJ090664523 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Međunarodni Problemi |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)DOAJ090664523 |
| title |
The just war theory and international law |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ100391370 (DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 |
| title_full |
The just war theory and international law |
| author_sort |
Jovanović Miloš |
| journal |
Međunarodni Problemi |
| journalStr |
Međunarodni Problemi |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
eng srp |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2007 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
243 |
| author_browse |
Jovanović Miloš |
| container_volume |
59 |
| class |
BL1-2790 K7000-7720 JZ2-6530 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jovanović Miloš |
| doi_str_mv |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J |
| title_sort |
just war theory and international law |
| callnumber |
BL1-2790 |
| title_auth |
The just war theory and international law |
| abstract |
The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. |
| abstractGer |
The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_62 |
| container_issue |
2-3 |
| title_short |
The just war theory and international law |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7 http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
DOAJ090664523 |
| callnumber-subject |
BL - Religions, Mythology, Rationalism |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.2298/MEDJP0703243J |
| callnumber-a |
BL1-2790 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:25:06.047Z |
| _version_ |
1803568237560987648 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100391370</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414092651.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/MEDJP0703243J</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100391370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BL1-2790</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7000-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jovanović Miloš</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The just war theory and international law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper provides a detailed overview of the existing relationship between the just war theory and international law. It stresses the fact that the two concepts were historically incompatible. The just war theory falls within ethics and appeals to superior principles that were not in accordance with the positivist law theory and the concept of sovereignty upon which public international law was founded. That incompatibility may at first seem as a paradox since the two concepts should be derived from a common base: the idea of justice. Further development of international law has clearly proved that law cannot be separated from the idea of justice and that is, to some extent, closely linked to some elements of natural law. The author concludes that in the domain of the use of force contemporary international law provides a legal frame, which is in accordance with the precepts of the just war theory.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">just war theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">natural law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">jus ad bellum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">public international law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">use of force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legitimacy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">UN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aggression</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legitimate defence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">humanitarian intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Religions. Mythology. Rationalism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Private international law. Conflict of laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Međunarodni Problemi</subfield><subfield code="d">Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade, 2024</subfield><subfield code="g">59(2007), 2-3, Seite 243-265</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)DOAJ090664523</subfield><subfield code="x">24060690</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:59</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2007</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2-3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:243-265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP0703243J</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/770a8dbc3433491f8c976b9ff3a662c7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2007/0025-85550703243J.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0025-8555</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">59</subfield><subfield code="j">2007</subfield><subfield code="e">2-3</subfield><subfield code="h">243-265</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398979 |