Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS

We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ethan Ward [verfasserIn] Alexander de la Vega [verfasserIn] Bahram Mobasher [verfasserIn] Elizabeth J. McGrath [verfasserIn] Kartheik G. Iyer [verfasserIn] Antonello Calabrò [verfasserIn] Luca Costantin [verfasserIn] Mark Dickinson [verfasserIn] Benne W. Holwerda [verfasserIn] Marc Huertas-Company [verfasserIn] Michaela Hirschmann [verfasserIn] Ray A. Lucas [verfasserIn] Viraj Pandya [verfasserIn] Stephen M. Wilkins [verfasserIn] L. Y. Aaron Yung [verfasserIn] Pablo Arrabal Haro [verfasserIn] Micaela B. Bagley [verfasserIn] Steven L. Finkelstein [verfasserIn] Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe [verfasserIn] Anton M. Koekemoer [verfasserIn] Casey Papovich [verfasserIn] Nor Pirzkal [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: The Astrophysical Journal - IOP Publishing, 2022, 962(2024), 2, p 176
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:962 ; year:2024 ; number:2, p 176

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ100830692

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ100830692
003	DE-627
005	20240414130203.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ100830692
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QB460-466
100	0		\|a Ethan Ward \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.
650		4	\|a Galaxy structure
650		4	\|a Galaxy evolution
650		4	\|a High-redshift galaxies
650		4	\|a Galaxy photometry
653		0	\|a Astrophysics
700	0		\|a Alexander de la Vega \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Bahram Mobasher \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Elizabeth J. McGrath \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kartheik G. Iyer \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Antonello Calabrò \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Luca Costantin \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Mark Dickinson \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Benne W. Holwerda \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Marc Huertas-Company \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Michaela Hirschmann \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ray A. Lucas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Viraj Pandya \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Stephen M. Wilkins \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a L. Y. Aaron Yung \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Pablo Arrabal Haro \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Micaela B. Bagley \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Steven L. Finkelstein \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Anton M. Koekemoer \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Casey Papovich \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nor Pirzkal \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t The Astrophysical Journal \|d IOP Publishing, 2022 \|g 962(2024), 2, p 176 \|w (DE-627)269019219 \|w (DE-600)1473835-1 \|x 15384357 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:962 \|g year:2024 \|g number:2, p 176
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 962 \|j 2024 \|e 2, p 176

Indexfelder

author_variant	e w ew a d l v adlv b m bm e j m ejm k g i kgi a c ac l c lc m d md b w h bwh m h c mhc m h mh r a l ral v p vp s m w smw l y a y lyay p a h pah m b b mbb s l f slf j s k jsk a m k amk c p cp n p np
matchkey_str	article:15384357:2024----::vltooteieaseainftromnglxesn
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
callnumber-subject-code	QB
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed doi (DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Ethan Ward verfasserin aut Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5. Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics Alexander de la Vega verfasserin aut Bahram Mobasher verfasserin aut Elizabeth J. McGrath verfasserin aut Kartheik G. Iyer verfasserin aut Antonello Calabrò verfasserin aut Luca Costantin verfasserin aut Mark Dickinson verfasserin aut Benne W. Holwerda verfasserin aut Marc Huertas-Company verfasserin aut Michaela Hirschmann verfasserin aut Ray A. Lucas verfasserin aut Viraj Pandya verfasserin aut Stephen M. Wilkins verfasserin aut L. Y. Aaron Yung verfasserin aut Pablo Arrabal Haro verfasserin aut Micaela B. Bagley verfasserin aut Steven L. Finkelstein verfasserin aut Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe verfasserin aut Anton M. Koekemoer verfasserin aut Casey Papovich verfasserin aut Nor Pirzkal verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 962(2024), 2, p 176 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 962 2024 2, p 176
spelling	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed doi (DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Ethan Ward verfasserin aut Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5. Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics Alexander de la Vega verfasserin aut Bahram Mobasher verfasserin aut Elizabeth J. McGrath verfasserin aut Kartheik G. Iyer verfasserin aut Antonello Calabrò verfasserin aut Luca Costantin verfasserin aut Mark Dickinson verfasserin aut Benne W. Holwerda verfasserin aut Marc Huertas-Company verfasserin aut Michaela Hirschmann verfasserin aut Ray A. Lucas verfasserin aut Viraj Pandya verfasserin aut Stephen M. Wilkins verfasserin aut L. Y. Aaron Yung verfasserin aut Pablo Arrabal Haro verfasserin aut Micaela B. Bagley verfasserin aut Steven L. Finkelstein verfasserin aut Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe verfasserin aut Anton M. Koekemoer verfasserin aut Casey Papovich verfasserin aut Nor Pirzkal verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 962(2024), 2, p 176 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 962 2024 2, p 176
allfields_unstemmed	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed doi (DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Ethan Ward verfasserin aut Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5. Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics Alexander de la Vega verfasserin aut Bahram Mobasher verfasserin aut Elizabeth J. McGrath verfasserin aut Kartheik G. Iyer verfasserin aut Antonello Calabrò verfasserin aut Luca Costantin verfasserin aut Mark Dickinson verfasserin aut Benne W. Holwerda verfasserin aut Marc Huertas-Company verfasserin aut Michaela Hirschmann verfasserin aut Ray A. Lucas verfasserin aut Viraj Pandya verfasserin aut Stephen M. Wilkins verfasserin aut L. Y. Aaron Yung verfasserin aut Pablo Arrabal Haro verfasserin aut Micaela B. Bagley verfasserin aut Steven L. Finkelstein verfasserin aut Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe verfasserin aut Anton M. Koekemoer verfasserin aut Casey Papovich verfasserin aut Nor Pirzkal verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 962(2024), 2, p 176 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 962 2024 2, p 176
allfieldsGer	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed doi (DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Ethan Ward verfasserin aut Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5. Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics Alexander de la Vega verfasserin aut Bahram Mobasher verfasserin aut Elizabeth J. McGrath verfasserin aut Kartheik G. Iyer verfasserin aut Antonello Calabrò verfasserin aut Luca Costantin verfasserin aut Mark Dickinson verfasserin aut Benne W. Holwerda verfasserin aut Marc Huertas-Company verfasserin aut Michaela Hirschmann verfasserin aut Ray A. Lucas verfasserin aut Viraj Pandya verfasserin aut Stephen M. Wilkins verfasserin aut L. Y. Aaron Yung verfasserin aut Pablo Arrabal Haro verfasserin aut Micaela B. Bagley verfasserin aut Steven L. Finkelstein verfasserin aut Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe verfasserin aut Anton M. Koekemoer verfasserin aut Casey Papovich verfasserin aut Nor Pirzkal verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 962(2024), 2, p 176 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 962 2024 2, p 176
allfieldsSound	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed doi (DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QB460-466 Ethan Ward verfasserin aut Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5. Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics Alexander de la Vega verfasserin aut Bahram Mobasher verfasserin aut Elizabeth J. McGrath verfasserin aut Kartheik G. Iyer verfasserin aut Antonello Calabrò verfasserin aut Luca Costantin verfasserin aut Mark Dickinson verfasserin aut Benne W. Holwerda verfasserin aut Marc Huertas-Company verfasserin aut Michaela Hirschmann verfasserin aut Ray A. Lucas verfasserin aut Viraj Pandya verfasserin aut Stephen M. Wilkins verfasserin aut L. Y. Aaron Yung verfasserin aut Pablo Arrabal Haro verfasserin aut Micaela B. Bagley verfasserin aut Steven L. Finkelstein verfasserin aut Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe verfasserin aut Anton M. Koekemoer verfasserin aut Casey Papovich verfasserin aut Nor Pirzkal verfasserin aut In The Astrophysical Journal IOP Publishing, 2022 962(2024), 2, p 176 (DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1 15384357 nnns volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 962 2024 2, p 176
language	English
source	In The Astrophysical Journal 962(2024), 2, p 176 volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176
sourceStr	In The Astrophysical Journal 962(2024), 2, p 176 volume:962 year:2024 number:2, p 176
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry Astrophysics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	The Astrophysical Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ethan Ward @@aut@@ Alexander de la Vega @@aut@@ Bahram Mobasher @@aut@@ Elizabeth J. McGrath @@aut@@ Kartheik G. Iyer @@aut@@ Antonello Calabrò @@aut@@ Luca Costantin @@aut@@ Mark Dickinson @@aut@@ Benne W. Holwerda @@aut@@ Marc Huertas-Company @@aut@@ Michaela Hirschmann @@aut@@ Ray A. Lucas @@aut@@ Viraj Pandya @@aut@@ Stephen M. Wilkins @@aut@@ L. Y. Aaron Yung @@aut@@ Pablo Arrabal Haro @@aut@@ Micaela B. Bagley @@aut@@ Steven L. Finkelstein @@aut@@ Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe @@aut@@ Anton M. Koekemoer @@aut@@ Casey Papovich @@aut@@ Nor Pirzkal @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	269019219
id	DOAJ100830692
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100830692</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414130203.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100830692</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QB460-466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethan Ward</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">High-redshift galaxies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy photometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Astrophysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexander de la Vega</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bahram Mobasher</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elizabeth J. McGrath</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kartheik G. Iyer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonello Calabrò</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luca Costantin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mark Dickinson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Benne W. Holwerda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marc Huertas-Company</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michaela Hirschmann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ray A. Lucas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Viraj Pandya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stephen M. Wilkins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L. Y. Aaron Yung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pablo Arrabal Haro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Micaela B. Bagley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steven L. Finkelstein</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anton M. Koekemoer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Casey Papovich</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nor Pirzkal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Astrophysical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">IOP Publishing, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">962(2024), 2, p 176</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)269019219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473835-1</subfield><subfield code="x">15384357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:962</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">962</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Ethan Ward
spellingShingle	Ethan Ward misc QB460-466 misc Galaxy structure misc Galaxy evolution misc High-redshift galaxies misc Galaxy photometry misc Astrophysics Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
authorStr	Ethan Ward
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)269019219
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QB460-466
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	15384357
topic_title	QB460-466 Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS Galaxy structure Galaxy evolution High-redshift galaxies Galaxy photometry
topic	misc QB460-466 misc Galaxy structure misc Galaxy evolution misc High-redshift galaxies misc Galaxy photometry misc Astrophysics
topic_unstemmed	misc QB460-466 misc Galaxy structure misc Galaxy evolution misc High-redshift galaxies misc Galaxy photometry misc Astrophysics
topic_browse	misc QB460-466 misc Galaxy structure misc Galaxy evolution misc High-redshift galaxies misc Galaxy photometry misc Astrophysics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	The Astrophysical Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	269019219
hierarchy_top_title	The Astrophysical Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)269019219 (DE-600)1473835-1
title	Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ100830692 (DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0
title_full	Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
author_sort	Ethan Ward
journal	The Astrophysical Journal
journalStr	The Astrophysical Journal
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Ethan Ward Alexander de la Vega Bahram Mobasher Elizabeth J. McGrath Kartheik G. Iyer Antonello Calabrò Luca Costantin Mark Dickinson Benne W. Holwerda Marc Huertas-Company Michaela Hirschmann Ray A. Lucas Viraj Pandya Stephen M. Wilkins L. Y. Aaron Yung Pablo Arrabal Haro Micaela B. Bagley Steven L. Finkelstein Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Anton M. Koekemoer Casey Papovich Nor Pirzkal
container_volume	962
class	QB460-466
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ethan Ward
doi_str_mv	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	evolution of the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies since z = 5.5 revealed by ceers
callnumber	QB460-466
title_auth	Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
abstract	We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.
abstractGer	We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.
abstract_unstemmed	We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2, p 176
title_short	Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS
url	https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0 https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357
remote_bool	true
author2	Alexander de la Vega Bahram Mobasher Elizabeth J. McGrath Kartheik G. Iyer Antonello Calabrò Luca Costantin Mark Dickinson Benne W. Holwerda Marc Huertas-Company Michaela Hirschmann Ray A. Lucas Viraj Pandya Stephen M. Wilkins L. Y. Aaron Yung Pablo Arrabal Haro Micaela B. Bagley Steven L. Finkelstein Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Anton M. Koekemoer Casey Papovich Nor Pirzkal
author2Str	Alexander de la Vega Bahram Mobasher Elizabeth J. McGrath Kartheik G. Iyer Antonello Calabrò Luca Costantin Mark Dickinson Benne W. Holwerda Marc Huertas-Company Michaela Hirschmann Ray A. Lucas Viraj Pandya Stephen M. Wilkins L. Y. Aaron Yung Pablo Arrabal Haro Micaela B. Bagley Steven L. Finkelstein Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Anton M. Koekemoer Casey Papovich Nor Pirzkal
ppnlink	269019219
callnumber-subject	QB - Astronomy
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed
callnumber-a	QB460-466
up_date	2024-07-03T16:55:51.331Z
_version_	1803577722231848960
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ100830692</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414130203.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ100830692</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QB460-466</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ethan Ward</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M _⋆ ≥ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy evolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">High-redshift galaxies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Galaxy photometry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Astrophysics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alexander de la Vega</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bahram Mobasher</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elizabeth J. McGrath</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kartheik G. Iyer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antonello Calabrò</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luca Costantin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mark Dickinson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Benne W. Holwerda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marc Huertas-Company</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michaela Hirschmann</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ray A. Lucas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Viraj Pandya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stephen M. Wilkins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">L. Y. Aaron Yung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pablo Arrabal Haro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Micaela B. Bagley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steven L. Finkelstein</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Anton M. Koekemoer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Casey Papovich</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nor Pirzkal</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">The Astrophysical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">IOP Publishing, 2022</subfield><subfield code="g">962(2024), 2, p 176</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)269019219</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1473835-1</subfield><subfield code="x">15384357</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:962</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2, p 176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d33b1acb904246f9b7f6863c4bb6a5d0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad20ed</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1538-4357</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">962</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="e">2, p 176</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4013157

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?