Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective

The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness l...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ji-In Koo [verfasserIn] Suk-Jae Jeong [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2024

Schlagwörter:	Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: IEEE Access - IEEE, 2014, 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:12 ; year:2024 ; pages:23827-23853

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ101393679

Internformat


LEADER	01000naa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ101393679
003	DE-627
005	20240414162720.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ101393679
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TK1-9971
100	0		\|a Ji-In Koo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
264		1	\|c 2024
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.
650		4	\|a Integration readiness level
650		4	\|a system readiness level
650		4	\|a technology readiness assessment
650		4	\|a technology readiness level
653		0	\|a Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
700	0		\|a Suk-Jae Jeong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t IEEE Access \|d IEEE, 2014 \|g 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 \|w (DE-627)728440385 \|w (DE-600)2687964-5 \|x 21693536 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:12 \|g year:2024 \|g pages:23827-23853
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 12 \|j 2024 \|h 23827-23853

Indexfelder

author_variant	j i k jik s j j sjj
matchkey_str	article:21693536:2024----::mrvdehooyednsassmnfaeokosseossesrmss
hierarchy_sort_str	2024
callnumber-subject-code	TK
publishDate	2024
allfields	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 doi (DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Ji-In Koo verfasserin aut Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems. Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Suk-Jae Jeong verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2024 23827-23853
spelling	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 doi (DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Ji-In Koo verfasserin aut Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems. Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Suk-Jae Jeong verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2024 23827-23853
allfields_unstemmed	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 doi (DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Ji-In Koo verfasserin aut Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems. Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Suk-Jae Jeong verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2024 23827-23853
allfieldsGer	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 doi (DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Ji-In Koo verfasserin aut Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems. Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Suk-Jae Jeong verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2024 23827-23853
allfieldsSound	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 doi (DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TK1-9971 Ji-In Koo verfasserin aut Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective 2024 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems. Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Suk-Jae Jeong verfasserin aut In IEEE Access IEEE, 2014 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 (DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5 21693536 nnns volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 kostenfrei https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 12 2024 23827-23853
language	English
source	In IEEE Access 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853
sourceStr	In IEEE Access 12(2024), Seite 23827-23853 volume:12 year:2024 pages:23827-23853
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	IEEE Access
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ji-In Koo @@aut@@ Suk-Jae Jeong @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2024-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	728440385
id	DOAJ101393679
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ101393679</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414162720.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ101393679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-In Koo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Integration readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology readiness assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suk-Jae Jeong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2024), Seite 23827-23853</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23827-23853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="h">23827-23853</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Ji-In Koo
spellingShingle	Ji-In Koo misc TK1-9971 misc Integration readiness level misc system readiness level misc technology readiness assessment misc technology readiness level misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
authorStr	Ji-In Koo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)728440385
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TK1-9971
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	21693536
topic_title	TK1-9971 Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective Integration readiness level system readiness level technology readiness assessment technology readiness level
topic	misc TK1-9971 misc Integration readiness level misc system readiness level misc technology readiness assessment misc technology readiness level misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
topic_unstemmed	misc TK1-9971 misc Integration readiness level misc system readiness level misc technology readiness assessment misc technology readiness level misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
topic_browse	misc TK1-9971 misc Integration readiness level misc system readiness level misc technology readiness assessment misc technology readiness level misc Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	IEEE Access
hierarchy_parent_id	728440385
hierarchy_top_title	IEEE Access
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)728440385 (DE-600)2687964-5
title	Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ101393679 (DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2
title_full	Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
author_sort	Ji-In Koo
journal	IEEE Access
journalStr	IEEE Access
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2024
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	23827
author_browse	Ji-In Koo Suk-Jae Jeong
container_volume	12
class	TK1-9971
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ji-In Koo
doi_str_mv	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	improved technology readiness assessment framework for system-of-systems from a system integration perspective
callnumber	TK1-9971
title_auth	Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
abstract	The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.
abstractGer	The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.
abstract_unstemmed	The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective
url	https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229 https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/ https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536
remote_bool	true
author2	Suk-Jae Jeong
author2Str	Suk-Jae Jeong
ppnlink	728440385
callnumber-subject	TK - Electrical and Nuclear Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229
callnumber-a	TK1-9971
up_date	2024-07-03T20:23:15.144Z
_version_	1803590770514460672
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ101393679</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414162720.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">240414s2024 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ101393679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TK1-9971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-In Koo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2024</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The military of the Republic of Korea utilizes technology readiness assessment (TRA) to quantitatively evaluate the maturity of domestic technologies. TRA is a key tool for determining the research and development potential in the country. As TRA employs hardware (HW)-oriented technology readiness levels (TRLs), it is suitable for independently assessing individual technologies. However, it has limitations in terms of evaluation from a system-integration perspective. Additionally, the results of checklist-based assessments are highly likely to involve subjectivity, which may yield sparse quantitative insights. This study proposes an enhanced TRA framework in which TRA procedures and criteria are redefined from the system-integration perspective. A framework that can overcome the limitations of the current TRL and TRA frameworks and enable easier, more intuitive assessments is developed. The proposed framework distinguishes between a technology element and a critical technology element (CTE) in terms of HW, software (SW), and interface (IF) and redefines TRLs. Under this framework, TRA is performed according to the TRLs that are redefined in terms of HW, SW, and IF; considering risk management, the lowest evaluation value is used as the system maturity level. The proposed CTE selection method minimizes external evaluator interventions by considering the quantitative goals of the key required operational capabilities, development difficulties, and applications of commercial off-the-shelf technologies. The effectiveness of this framework is confirmed through a case study involving three systems of systems. The results of this study can inspire research at the framework level and contribute to the improvement of existing TRA systems.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Integration readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">system readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology readiness assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology readiness level</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Suk-Jae Jeong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">IEEE Access</subfield><subfield code="d">IEEE, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">12(2024), Seite 23827-23853</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)728440385</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2687964-5</subfield><subfield code="x">21693536</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:12</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2024</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:23827-23853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3362229</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1d5e06880fc8452888e795a0aec6b6f2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10419355/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">12</subfield><subfield code="j">2024</subfield><subfield code="h">23827-23853</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399295

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Improved Technology Readiness Assessment Framework for System-of-Systems From a System Integration Perspective

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?