Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different
Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, modera...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Biswash, Md Romel [verfasserIn] Lu, Hai-long [verfasserIn] Dong, Ge [verfasserIn] He, Xian [verfasserIn] Li, Jiu-yu [verfasserIn] Xu, Ren-kou [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Ecotoxicology and environmental safety - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977, 223 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:223 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV000016659 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV000016659 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230524125724.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230426s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV000016659 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 44.13 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Biswash, Md Romel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Rice varieties | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adsorption and absorption | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cu(II) phytotoxicity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chemical forms | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Zeta potential | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lu, Hai-long |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dong, Ge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a He, Xian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Li, Jiu-yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Ren-kou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 |g 223 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)266018467 |w (DE-600)1466969-9 |w (DE-576)104193719 |x 1090-2414 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:223 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_165 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2007 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2031 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2548 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.13 |j Medizinische Ökologie |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 223 | ||
| author_variant |
m r b mr mrb h l l hll g d gd x h xh j y l jyl r k x rkx |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10902414:2021----::fetfotufccagotebopinnacmlto |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| bklnumber |
44.13 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 doi (DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Biswash, Md Romel verfasserin aut Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential Lu, Hai-long verfasserin aut Dong, Ge verfasserin aut He, Xian verfasserin aut Li, Jiu-yu verfasserin aut Xu, Ren-kou verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 223 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 1090-2414 nnns volume:223 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie AR 223 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 doi (DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Biswash, Md Romel verfasserin aut Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential Lu, Hai-long verfasserin aut Dong, Ge verfasserin aut He, Xian verfasserin aut Li, Jiu-yu verfasserin aut Xu, Ren-kou verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 223 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 1090-2414 nnns volume:223 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie AR 223 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 doi (DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Biswash, Md Romel verfasserin aut Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential Lu, Hai-long verfasserin aut Dong, Ge verfasserin aut He, Xian verfasserin aut Li, Jiu-yu verfasserin aut Xu, Ren-kou verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 223 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 1090-2414 nnns volume:223 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie AR 223 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 doi (DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Biswash, Md Romel verfasserin aut Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential Lu, Hai-long verfasserin aut Dong, Ge verfasserin aut He, Xian verfasserin aut Li, Jiu-yu verfasserin aut Xu, Ren-kou verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 223 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 1090-2414 nnns volume:223 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie AR 223 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 doi (DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Biswash, Md Romel verfasserin aut Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential Lu, Hai-long verfasserin aut Dong, Ge verfasserin aut He, Xian verfasserin aut Li, Jiu-yu verfasserin aut Xu, Ren-kou verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977 223 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 1090-2414 nnns volume:223 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 44.13 Medizinische Ökologie AR 223 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 223 volume:223 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 223 volume:223 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Medizinische Ökologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Biswash, Md Romel @@aut@@ Lu, Hai-long @@aut@@ Dong, Ge @@aut@@ He, Xian @@aut@@ Li, Jiu-yu @@aut@@ Xu, Ren-kou @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
266018467 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV000016659 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV000016659</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524125724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230426s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV000016659</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biswash, Md Romel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rice varieties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adsorption and absorption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cu(II) phytotoxicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical forms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zeta potential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu, Hai-long</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Ge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Xian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Jiu-yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Ren-kou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">223</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266018467</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466969-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)104193719</subfield><subfield code="x">1090-2414</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:223</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">223</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Biswash, Md Romel |
| spellingShingle |
Biswash, Md Romel ddc 610 bkl 44.13 misc Rice varieties misc Adsorption and absorption misc Cu(II) phytotoxicity misc Chemical forms misc Zeta potential Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| authorStr |
Biswash, Md Romel |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)266018467 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1090-2414 |
| topic_title |
610 DE-600 44.13 bkl Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different Rice varieties Adsorption and absorption Cu(II) phytotoxicity Chemical forms Zeta potential |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.13 misc Rice varieties misc Adsorption and absorption misc Cu(II) phytotoxicity misc Chemical forms misc Zeta potential |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.13 misc Rice varieties misc Adsorption and absorption misc Cu(II) phytotoxicity misc Chemical forms misc Zeta potential |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.13 misc Rice varieties misc Adsorption and absorption misc Cu(II) phytotoxicity misc Chemical forms misc Zeta potential |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
266018467 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)266018467 (DE-600)1466969-9 (DE-576)104193719 |
| title |
Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV000016659 (ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X |
| title_full |
Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| author_sort |
Biswash, Md Romel |
| journal |
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
| journalStr |
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| author_browse |
Biswash, Md Romel Lu, Hai-long Dong, Ge He, Xian Li, Jiu-yu Xu, Ren-kou |
| container_volume |
223 |
| class |
610 DE-600 44.13 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Biswash, Md Romel |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of cu(ii) by different |
| title_auth |
Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| abstract |
Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. |
| abstractGer |
Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2031 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2548 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| title_short |
Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Lu, Hai-long Dong, Ge He, Xian Li, Jiu-yu Xu, Ren-kou |
| author2Str |
Lu, Hai-long Dong, Ge He, Xian Li, Jiu-yu Xu, Ren-kou |
| ppnlink |
266018467 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:35:20.853Z |
| _version_ |
1803848222882398208 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV000016659</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524125724.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230426s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112547</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV000016659</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0147-6513(21)00659-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Biswash, Md Romel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of root surface charge on the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by different</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Excessive amounts of copper (Cu) in soils causes toxic effects on plants. In this study, 58 rice cultivars were classified into tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible types for Cu(II) toxicity based on 50% germination (LC50). Nine japonica rice varieties (three each from the tolerant, moderately tolerant, and susceptible groups) and six indica rice varieties (three from the moderately tolerant and susceptible groups) were selected for the hydroponics experiments. In the short-term adsorption experiment, Cu(II) adsorbed on rice roots was differentiated into exchangeable, complexed, and precipitated forms. Similarly, it was done for long-term culture. Absorption of Cu(II) by rice roots and shoots was also measured. The results indicated that adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as complexed and exchangeable forms on rice roots in the short-term adsorption experiment, and the exchangeable and complexed Cu(II) levels were greater for indica rice than for japonica rice due to the larger negative charge on the indica rice roots. The adsorbed Cu(II) mainly existed as a complexed form in the long-term culture experiment, and the exchangeable Cu(II) level was much lower than that in the short-term adsorption experiment due to the absorption of Cu(II) by rice plants. The indica varieties absorbed more Cu(II) than the japonica varieties. Furthermore, the absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) by the susceptible varieties were greater than by the tolerant and moderately tolerant varieties for both the japonica and indica rice. The absorption and accumulation of Cu(II) in rice roots were much greater than in the shoots. Chlorophyll content, and the lengths and dry matter weights of the rice roots and shoots decreased with increasing Cu(II) concentration. The Cu(II) showed greater toxicity toward indica varieties than japonica varieties, and the greater negative charge on indica roots was one of reasons for the greater exchangeable Cu(II) on the roots, the increase in Cu(II) toxicity, and the higher uptake of Cu(II) by indica rice varieties compared to japonica rice varieties.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rice varieties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Adsorption and absorption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cu(II) phytotoxicity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Chemical forms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zeta potential</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lu, Hai-long</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong, Ge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Xian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Jiu-yu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Ren-kou</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecotoxicology and environmental safety</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">223</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266018467</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466969-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)104193719</subfield><subfield code="x">1090-2414</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:223</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2548</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.13</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinische Ökologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">223</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400216 |