Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node
The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be cla...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Feng, Da [verfasserIn] Sun, Weiqiang [verfasserIn] Hu, Weisheng [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Optical switching and networking - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005, 31, Seite 100-113 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:31 ; pages:100-113 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV001135619 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV001135619 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231205155002.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230428s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV001135619 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 004 |q DE-600 |
100 | 1 | |a Feng, Da |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Large data transfer | |
650 | 4 | |a Advance Reservation | |
650 | 4 | |a WDM networks | |
650 | 4 | |a Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model | |
650 | 4 | |a Performance analysis | |
700 | 1 | |a Sun, Weiqiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Weisheng |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Optical switching and networking |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 |g 31, Seite 100-113 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)481275304 |w (DE-600)2179455-8 |w (DE-576)259486531 |x 1872-9770 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g pages:100-113 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 31 |h 100-113 |
author_variant |
d f df w s ws w h wh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18729770:2018----::iesoigftradrnfrdntokwtsr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 doi (DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 004 DE-600 Feng, Da verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 aut Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node 2018 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis Sun, Weiqiang verfasserin aut Hu, Weisheng verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 aut Enthalten in Optical switching and networking Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 31, Seite 100-113 Online-Ressource (DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 1872-9770 nnns volume:31 pages:100-113 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 31 100-113 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 doi (DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 004 DE-600 Feng, Da verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 aut Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node 2018 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis Sun, Weiqiang verfasserin aut Hu, Weisheng verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 aut Enthalten in Optical switching and networking Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 31, Seite 100-113 Online-Ressource (DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 1872-9770 nnns volume:31 pages:100-113 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 31 100-113 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 doi (DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 004 DE-600 Feng, Da verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 aut Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node 2018 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis Sun, Weiqiang verfasserin aut Hu, Weisheng verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 aut Enthalten in Optical switching and networking Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 31, Seite 100-113 Online-Ressource (DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 1872-9770 nnns volume:31 pages:100-113 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 31 100-113 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 doi (DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 004 DE-600 Feng, Da verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 aut Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node 2018 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis Sun, Weiqiang verfasserin aut Hu, Weisheng verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 aut Enthalten in Optical switching and networking Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 31, Seite 100-113 Online-Ressource (DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 1872-9770 nnns volume:31 pages:100-113 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 31 100-113 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 doi (DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 004 DE-600 Feng, Da verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 aut Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node 2018 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis Sun, Weiqiang verfasserin aut Hu, Weisheng verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 aut Enthalten in Optical switching and networking Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005 31, Seite 100-113 Online-Ressource (DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 1872-9770 nnns volume:31 pages:100-113 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 31 100-113 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Optical switching and networking 31, Seite 100-113 volume:31 pages:100-113 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Optical switching and networking 31, Seite 100-113 volume:31 pages:100-113 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis |
dewey-raw |
004 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Optical switching and networking |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Feng, Da @@aut@@ Sun, Weiqiang @@aut@@ Hu, Weisheng @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
481275304 |
dewey-sort |
14 |
id |
ELV001135619 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV001135619</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205155002.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230428s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV001135619</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Da</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Large data transfer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advance Reservation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">WDM networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Weiqiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Weisheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Optical switching and networking</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">31, Seite 100-113</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)481275304</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2179455-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259486531</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-9770</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100-113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="h">100-113</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Feng, Da |
spellingShingle |
Feng, Da ddc 004 misc Large data transfer misc Advance Reservation misc WDM networks misc Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model misc Performance analysis Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
authorStr |
Feng, Da |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)481275304 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
004 - Data processing & computer science |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1872-9770 |
topic_title |
004 DE-600 Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node Large data transfer Advance Reservation WDM networks Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model Performance analysis |
topic |
ddc 004 misc Large data transfer misc Advance Reservation misc WDM networks misc Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model misc Performance analysis |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 004 misc Large data transfer misc Advance Reservation misc WDM networks misc Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model misc Performance analysis |
topic_browse |
ddc 004 misc Large data transfer misc Advance Reservation misc WDM networks misc Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model misc Performance analysis |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Optical switching and networking |
hierarchy_parent_id |
481275304 |
dewey-tens |
000 - Computer science, knowledge & systems |
hierarchy_top_title |
Optical switching and networking |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)481275304 (DE-600)2179455-8 (DE-576)259486531 |
title |
Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV001135619 (ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8 |
title_full |
Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
author_sort |
Feng, Da |
journal |
Optical switching and networking |
journalStr |
Optical switching and networking |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
000 - Computer science, information & general works |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
100 |
author_browse |
Feng, Da Sun, Weiqiang Hu, Weisheng |
container_volume |
31 |
class |
004 DE-600 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Feng, Da |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-9062-2932 (ORCID)0000-0002-6168-2688 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932 (orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688 |
dewey-full |
004 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
dimensioning of store-and-transfer wdm networks with stratified roadm node |
title_auth |
Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
abstract |
The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. |
abstractGer |
The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Sun, Weiqiang Hu, Weisheng |
author2Str |
Sun, Weiqiang Hu, Weisheng |
ppnlink |
481275304 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T20:20:57.461Z |
_version_ |
1803862417041522688 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV001135619</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20231205155002.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230428s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.osn.2018.09.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV001135619</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1573-4277(18)30001-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">004</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Feng, Da</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-9062-2932</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dimensioning of store-and-transfer WDM networks with stratified ROADM node</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The so called Store-and-Transfer WDM Network (STWN) can store data in source storage and provision lightpaths at an optimal time when wavelengths are clear of conflicts. Consequently, blocking of requests can be decreased and resource utilization of the network can be improved. If traffic can be classified into delay-sensitive packet flows and deadline-constrained large data transfers, we can use a stratified node architecture to reduce cost of STWN node by reducing port count of optical and electronic switches. In this work, we investigate dimensioning of a network of flexible grid reconfigurable optical add/drop multiplexers and compare the result with that obtain by dimensioning of STWN. We propose a two-step method to determine the amount of spectrum required to satisfy the demand of large data transfers, which is given as a load matrix with a deadline and blocking rate. We also obtain the overall utilization over all links. The method firstly uses Markov chain to model variable bandwidth allocation over a lightpath and searches for amount of required spectrum of all source-destination pairs, and secondly optimizes routing and spectrum assignment for the matrix of amount of required spectrum to minimize maximum amount of spectrum used over each link. Numerical results show the following with all numbers given as absolute values: If bandwidth allocation method Min is used, the utilization can reach 0.7 and the amount of required spectrum is 30% more than that required by STWN. If bandwidth allocation method Dyna is used, the utilization can reach 0.9 and the amount of required spectrum is similar to that required by STWN. Also, under the same load, if blocking increases from 0.001 to 0.01, the amount of required spectrum decreases and the utilization increases 0.08, which denotes over-provisioning of spectrum and allowing preemption of spectrum during hours of peak traffic can effectively decrease blocking.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Large data transfer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advance Reservation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">WDM networks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deadline-driven scheduled traffic model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sun, Weiqiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Weisheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6168-2688</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Optical switching and networking</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">31, Seite 100-113</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)481275304</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2179455-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259486531</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-9770</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:31</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:100-113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">31</subfield><subfield code="h">100-113</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398793 |