Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system

A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Xu, Jing [verfasserIn] Han, Huifang [verfasserIn] Ning, Tangyuan [verfasserIn] Li, Zengjia [verfasserIn] Lal, Rattan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Field crops research - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978, 233, Seite 33-40
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:233 ; pages:33-40

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016

Katalog-ID:	ELV001587005

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV001587005
003	DE-627
005	20230524160857.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230428s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV001587005
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 630 \|a 640 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 48.00 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Xu, Jing \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.
650		4	\|a Conventional tillage
650		4	\|a No-tillage
650		4	\|a Subsoiling
650		4	\|a Yield
650		4	\|a Wheat-maize system
700	1		\|a Han, Huifang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Ning, Tangyuan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Li, Zengjia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Lal, Rattan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Field crops research \|d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 \|g 233, Seite 33-40 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)32050316X \|w (DE-600)2012484-3 \|w (DE-576)090954912 \|x 1872-6852 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:233 \|g pages:33-40
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SSG-OPC-FOR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 48.00 \|j Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 233 \|h 33-40

Indexfelder

author_variant	j x jx h h hh t n tn z l zl r l rl
matchkey_str	article:18726852:2019----::ogemfetotlaensrwaaeetnolraicrocoyednyed
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
bklnumber	48.00
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 doi (DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Xu, Jing verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 aut Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system Han, Huifang verfasserin aut Ning, Tangyuan verfasserin aut Li, Zengjia verfasserin aut Lal, Rattan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Field crops research Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 233, Seite 33-40 Online-Ressource (DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912 1872-6852 nnns volume:233 pages:33-40 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 233 33-40
spelling	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 doi (DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Xu, Jing verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 aut Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system Han, Huifang verfasserin aut Ning, Tangyuan verfasserin aut Li, Zengjia verfasserin aut Lal, Rattan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Field crops research Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 233, Seite 33-40 Online-Ressource (DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912 1872-6852 nnns volume:233 pages:33-40 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 233 33-40
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 doi (DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Xu, Jing verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 aut Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system Han, Huifang verfasserin aut Ning, Tangyuan verfasserin aut Li, Zengjia verfasserin aut Lal, Rattan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Field crops research Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 233, Seite 33-40 Online-Ressource (DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912 1872-6852 nnns volume:233 pages:33-40 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 233 33-40
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 doi (DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Xu, Jing verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 aut Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system Han, Huifang verfasserin aut Ning, Tangyuan verfasserin aut Li, Zengjia verfasserin aut Lal, Rattan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Field crops research Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 233, Seite 33-40 Online-Ressource (DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912 1872-6852 nnns volume:233 pages:33-40 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 233 33-40
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016 doi (DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Xu, Jing verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046 aut Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP. Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system Han, Huifang verfasserin aut Ning, Tangyuan verfasserin aut Li, Zengjia verfasserin aut Lal, Rattan verfasserin aut Enthalten in Field crops research Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978 233, Seite 33-40 Online-Ressource (DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912 1872-6852 nnns volume:233 pages:33-40 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 233 33-40
language	English
source	Enthalten in Field crops research 233, Seite 33-40 volume:233 pages:33-40
sourceStr	Enthalten in Field crops research 233, Seite 33-40 volume:233 pages:33-40
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system
dewey-raw	630
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Field crops research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Xu, Jing @@aut@@ Han, Huifang @@aut@@ Ning, Tangyuan @@aut@@ Li, Zengjia @@aut@@ Lal, Rattan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	32050316X
dewey-sort	3630
id	ELV001587005
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV001587005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524160857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230428s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV001587005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Jing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conventional tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">No-tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subsoiling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yield</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wheat-maize system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han, Huifang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ning, Tangyuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Zengjia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lal, Rattan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Field crops research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">233, Seite 33-40</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32050316X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012484-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954912</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-6852</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:233</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:33-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">233</subfield><subfield code="h">33-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Xu, Jing
spellingShingle	Xu, Jing ddc 630 bkl 48.00 misc Conventional tillage misc No-tillage misc Subsoiling misc Yield misc Wheat-maize system Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
authorStr	Xu, Jing
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)32050316X
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1872-6852
topic_title	630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system Conventional tillage No-tillage Subsoiling Yield Wheat-maize system
topic	ddc 630 bkl 48.00 misc Conventional tillage misc No-tillage misc Subsoiling misc Yield misc Wheat-maize system
topic_unstemmed	ddc 630 bkl 48.00 misc Conventional tillage misc No-tillage misc Subsoiling misc Yield misc Wheat-maize system
topic_browse	ddc 630 bkl 48.00 misc Conventional tillage misc No-tillage misc Subsoiling misc Yield misc Wheat-maize system
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Field crops research
hierarchy_parent_id	32050316X
dewey-tens	630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management
hierarchy_top_title	Field crops research
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)32050316X (DE-600)2012484-3 (DE-576)090954912
title	Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV001587005 (ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2
title_full	Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
author_sort	Xu, Jing
journal	Field crops research
journalStr	Field crops research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	33
author_browse	Xu, Jing Han, Huifang Ning, Tangyuan Li, Zengjia Lal, Rattan
container_volume	233
class	630 640 DE-600 48.00 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Xu, Jing
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0001-9137-7046
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046
dewey-full	630 640
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
title_auth	Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
abstract	A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.
abstractGer	A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.
abstract_unstemmed	A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system
remote_bool	true
author2	Han, Huifang Ning, Tangyuan Li, Zengjia Lal, Rattan
author2Str	Han, Huifang Ning, Tangyuan Li, Zengjia Lal, Rattan
ppnlink	32050316X
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016
up_date	2024-07-06T21:53:05.067Z
_version_	1803868213156511744
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV001587005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524160857.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230428s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV001587005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-4290(18)30590-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Jing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9137-7046</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A long-term experiment for testing different tillage methods and straw management practices was carried out in the Northern China Plain (NCP) since 2002 in a double cropping system (winter wheat and summer maize) rotated annually. Data for 11 yr (2005–2015) was collected to compare the long-term effects of six agricultural practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, crop yield, and yield stability. The six agricultural methods comprised of two main factors (i) tillage practices with three modalities—conventional tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT), and subsoiling (ST); and (ii) straw management with two modalities—straw return (S) and straw removal (0). Here, straw was usually defined as crop residue cut and removed with harvest. Finally, the six treatment combinations were represented as CT0, NT0, ST0, CTS, NTS, and STS. The SOC storage showed similar dynamic changing trends under all treatments, but was higher in NT and ST and straw return plots than in CT0 plots. Average SOC storage under STS and NTS reached 14.1, and 13.1 g kg−1, respectively. After 2005, both tillage practice and residue management affected SOC storage significantly. Cumulative yields for 11 yr with maize and wheat were higher for ST than NT and CT both with straw removal and straw return. Average crop yield increased by 6.2 and 20.1% in winter wheat and by 11.0 and 21.6% in summer maize, respectively, in ST0 and STS, when compared to CT0. NT, ST, and straw return increased crop yield stability, with STS being the most stable. Variability in STS was only 11.3% for winter wheat and 8.8% for summer maize. Pearson correlation analysis showed that winter wheat and summer maize yields were significantly and positively correlated with SOC storage. Subsoiling with straw return (STs) did not result in higher SOC than NTs after 11 yr, but it resulted in the highest cumulative yield for wheat and maize, and the highest yield stability for wheat. When straw was removed, SOC after 11 yr was highest for NT, but cumulative yields for wheat and maize were highest for ST. STS is firstly an optimal method to improve SOC storage, crop yield, and yield stability in the NCP.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conventional tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">No-tillage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subsoiling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Yield</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wheat-maize system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Han, Huifang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ning, Tangyuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Zengjia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lal, Rattan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Field crops research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1978</subfield><subfield code="g">233, Seite 33-40</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)32050316X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2012484-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954912</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-6852</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:233</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:33-40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">233</subfield><subfield code="h">33-40</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401388

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Long-term effects of tillage and straw management on soil organic carbon, crop yield, and yield stability in a wheat-maize system

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?