Genomic evaluation of resistance to

The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Dlamini, N.M. [verfasserIn] Visser, C. [verfasserIn] Snyman, M.A. [verfasserIn] Soma, P. [verfasserIn] Muchadeyi, F.C. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Small ruminant research - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988, 175, Seite 117-125
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:175 ; pages:117-125

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020

Katalog-ID:	ELV002353741

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV002353741
003	DE-627
005	20230524122318.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230429s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV002353741
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 630 \|a 640 \|q DE-600
100	1		\|a Dlamini, N.M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Genomic evaluation of resistance to
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.
650		4	\|a Body condition score
650		4	\|a Gastrointestinal nematodes
650		4	\|a Genomic
650		4	\|a Famacha
650		4	\|a Faecal egg count
700	1		\|a Visser, C. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Snyman, M.A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Soma, P. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Muchadeyi, F.C. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Small ruminant research \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 \|g 175, Seite 117-125 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)306591537 \|w (DE-600)1498734-X \|w (DE-576)090954483 \|x 0921-4488 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:175 \|g pages:117-125
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 175 \|h 117-125

Indexfelder

author_variant	n d nd c v cv m s ms p s ps f m fm
matchkey_str	article:09214488:2019----::eoieautoor
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 doi (DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 Dlamini, N.M. verfasserin aut Genomic evaluation of resistance to 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count Visser, C. verfasserin aut Snyman, M.A. verfasserin aut Soma, P. verfasserin aut Muchadeyi, F.C. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Small ruminant research Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 175, Seite 117-125 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483 0921-4488 nnns volume:175 pages:117-125 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 175 117-125
spelling	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 doi (DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 Dlamini, N.M. verfasserin aut Genomic evaluation of resistance to 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count Visser, C. verfasserin aut Snyman, M.A. verfasserin aut Soma, P. verfasserin aut Muchadeyi, F.C. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Small ruminant research Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 175, Seite 117-125 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483 0921-4488 nnns volume:175 pages:117-125 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 175 117-125
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 doi (DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 Dlamini, N.M. verfasserin aut Genomic evaluation of resistance to 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count Visser, C. verfasserin aut Snyman, M.A. verfasserin aut Soma, P. verfasserin aut Muchadeyi, F.C. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Small ruminant research Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 175, Seite 117-125 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483 0921-4488 nnns volume:175 pages:117-125 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 175 117-125
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 doi (DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 Dlamini, N.M. verfasserin aut Genomic evaluation of resistance to 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count Visser, C. verfasserin aut Snyman, M.A. verfasserin aut Soma, P. verfasserin aut Muchadeyi, F.C. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Small ruminant research Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 175, Seite 117-125 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483 0921-4488 nnns volume:175 pages:117-125 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 175 117-125
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020 doi (DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 Dlamini, N.M. verfasserin aut Genomic evaluation of resistance to 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible. Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count Visser, C. verfasserin aut Snyman, M.A. verfasserin aut Soma, P. verfasserin aut Muchadeyi, F.C. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Small ruminant research Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988 175, Seite 117-125 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483 0921-4488 nnns volume:175 pages:117-125 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 175 117-125
language	English
source	Enthalten in Small ruminant research 175, Seite 117-125 volume:175 pages:117-125
sourceStr	Enthalten in Small ruminant research 175, Seite 117-125 volume:175 pages:117-125
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count
dewey-raw	630
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Small ruminant research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Dlamini, N.M. @@aut@@ Visser, C. @@aut@@ Snyman, M.A. @@aut@@ Soma, P. @@aut@@ Muchadeyi, F.C. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	306591537
dewey-sort	3630
id	ELV002353741
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002353741</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524122318.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002353741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dlamini, N.M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genomic evaluation of resistance to</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body condition score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal nematodes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genomic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Famacha</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Faecal egg count</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Visser, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Snyman, M.A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soma, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muchadeyi, F.C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Small ruminant research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">175, Seite 117-125</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306591537</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1498734-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954483</subfield><subfield code="x">0921-4488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:175</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:117-125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">175</subfield><subfield code="h">117-125</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Dlamini, N.M.
spellingShingle	Dlamini, N.M. ddc 630 misc Body condition score misc Gastrointestinal nematodes misc Genomic misc Famacha misc Faecal egg count Genomic evaluation of resistance to
authorStr	Dlamini, N.M.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)306591537
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0921-4488
topic_title	630 640 DE-600 Genomic evaluation of resistance to Body condition score Gastrointestinal nematodes Genomic Famacha Faecal egg count
topic	ddc 630 misc Body condition score misc Gastrointestinal nematodes misc Genomic misc Famacha misc Faecal egg count
topic_unstemmed	ddc 630 misc Body condition score misc Gastrointestinal nematodes misc Genomic misc Famacha misc Faecal egg count
topic_browse	ddc 630 misc Body condition score misc Gastrointestinal nematodes misc Genomic misc Famacha misc Faecal egg count
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Small ruminant research
hierarchy_parent_id	306591537
dewey-tens	630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management
hierarchy_top_title	Small ruminant research
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)306591537 (DE-600)1498734-X (DE-576)090954483
title	Genomic evaluation of resistance to
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV002353741 (ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0
title_full	Genomic evaluation of resistance to
author_sort	Dlamini, N.M.
journal	Small ruminant research
journalStr	Small ruminant research
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	117
author_browse	Dlamini, N.M. Visser, C. Snyman, M.A. Soma, P. Muchadeyi, F.C.
container_volume	175
class	630 640 DE-600
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Dlamini, N.M.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020
dewey-full	630 640
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	genomic evaluation of resistance to
title_auth	Genomic evaluation of resistance to
abstract	The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.
abstractGer	The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.
abstract_unstemmed	The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	Genomic evaluation of resistance to
remote_bool	true
author2	Visser, C. Snyman, M.A. Soma, P. Muchadeyi, F.C.
author2Str	Visser, C. Snyman, M.A. Soma, P. Muchadeyi, F.C.
ppnlink	306591537
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020
up_date	2024-07-07T00:27:04.003Z
_version_	1803877900884115456
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002353741</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524122318.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.04.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002353741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0921-4488(18)30517-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dlamini, N.M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genomic evaluation of resistance to</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The aim of this study was to use genome-wide SNP data to investigate phenotypic and genetic differences in resistance to Haemonchus contortus between resistant and susceptible South African Dohne Merino sheep. The participating farm (Wauldby) has a history of heavy H. contortus challenge and implemented a selection strategy for resistance to H. contortus in 2011. Faecal egg count (FEC), body condition scores (BCS) and Famacha© scores (FAM) were recorded annually on lambs from weaning in January until the end of June from 2011 to 2014. Animals with FAM scores of ≥ 2.5 or BCS scores < 1.5 were subjected to anthelmintic treatment and recorded as “Dosed” animals. Animals (196) were selected for genotyping based on EBV for FEC and classified into Case and Control groups on the basis of whether they were dosed or not. The Grootfontein Dohne Merino flock has never been subjected to selection for resistance to gastrointestinal parasites and 48 animals were selected on FEC for genotyping. DNA obtained from blood samples were genotyped using the Illumina® Ovine SNP50 BeadChip. Principal component analysis (PCA) resulted in four distinct genetic clusters, with the Grootfontein sheep population clustering separately. The Wauldby animals in Cluster 3 had significantly lower FEC and higher BCS than the animals in Clusters 2 and 4. FEC breeding values of 114 ± 97, -629 ± 84 and -2 ± 45 were recorded for PCA-based Genetic cluster 2, 3 and 4 animals, respectively. The majority (88%) of animals in Cluster 3 were the progeny of sires from the resistant line. The average number of runs of homozygosity (ROH) was 44, 46, 54 and 47 per animal for Clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The highest number of ROHs was found on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10, on which QTL for resistance traits have been identified previously. Sires in Genetic cluster 3 were highly resistant and can be used in a breeding program to develop H. contortus resistant sheep. The results indicated genetic variation in host resistance against H. contortus in the Wauldby flock and breeding for resistance against nematodes is feasible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Body condition score</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gastrointestinal nematodes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genomic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Famacha</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Faecal egg count</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Visser, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Snyman, M.A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Soma, P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muchadeyi, F.C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Small ruminant research</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1988</subfield><subfield code="g">175, Seite 117-125</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306591537</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1498734-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090954483</subfield><subfield code="x">0921-4488</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:175</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:117-125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">175</subfield><subfield code="h">117-125</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4000654

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Genomic evaluation of resistance to

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?