Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate
An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Ye, Huawen [verfasserIn] Zhang, Qing [verfasserIn] Liu, Changmeng [verfasserIn] Wu, Chuanjie [verfasserIn] Duan, Zhichao [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Composite structures - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983, 225 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:225 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV002664216 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV002664216 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524144526.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV002664216 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 51.75 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ye, Huawen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. | ||
650 | 4 | |a CFRP plate | |
650 | 4 | |a Wedge anchorage | |
650 | 4 | |a Pretensioned bolt | |
650 | 4 | |a Failure mode | |
650 | 4 | |a Tension test | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Qing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Changmeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Chuanjie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Duan, Zhichao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Composite structures |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 |g 225 |w (DE-627)320509044 |w (DE-600)2013177-X |w (DE-576)094531447 |x 0263-8223 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:225 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.75 |j Verbundwerkstoffe |j Schichtstoffe |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 225 |
author_variant |
h y hy q z qz c l cl c w cw z d zd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:02638223:2019----::alrmcaimgvrignhrnfrefrcinaewdenhrg |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
bklnumber |
51.75 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 doi (DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Ye, Huawen verfasserin aut Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test Zhang, Qing verfasserin aut Liu, Changmeng verfasserin aut Wu, Chuanjie verfasserin aut Duan, Zhichao verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 225 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:225 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe AR 225 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 doi (DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Ye, Huawen verfasserin aut Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test Zhang, Qing verfasserin aut Liu, Changmeng verfasserin aut Wu, Chuanjie verfasserin aut Duan, Zhichao verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 225 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:225 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe AR 225 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 doi (DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Ye, Huawen verfasserin aut Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test Zhang, Qing verfasserin aut Liu, Changmeng verfasserin aut Wu, Chuanjie verfasserin aut Duan, Zhichao verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 225 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:225 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe AR 225 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 doi (DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Ye, Huawen verfasserin aut Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test Zhang, Qing verfasserin aut Liu, Changmeng verfasserin aut Wu, Chuanjie verfasserin aut Duan, Zhichao verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 225 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:225 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe AR 225 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 doi (DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Ye, Huawen verfasserin aut Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test Zhang, Qing verfasserin aut Liu, Changmeng verfasserin aut Wu, Chuanjie verfasserin aut Duan, Zhichao verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 225 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:225 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe AR 225 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Composite structures 225 volume:225 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Composite structures 225 volume:225 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test |
dewey-raw |
670 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Composite structures |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ye, Huawen @@aut@@ Zhang, Qing @@aut@@ Liu, Changmeng @@aut@@ Wu, Chuanjie @@aut@@ Duan, Zhichao @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
320509044 |
dewey-sort |
3670 |
id |
ELV002664216 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002664216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524144526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002664216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ye, Huawen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP plate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wedge anchorage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pretensioned bolt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure mode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tension test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Qing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Changmeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wu, Chuanjie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duan, Zhichao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Composite structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">225</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320509044</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013177-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094531447</subfield><subfield code="x">0263-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:225</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="j">Verbundwerkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Schichtstoffe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">225</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Ye, Huawen |
spellingShingle |
Ye, Huawen ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc CFRP plate misc Wedge anchorage misc Pretensioned bolt misc Failure mode misc Tension test Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
authorStr |
Ye, Huawen |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320509044 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0263-8223 |
topic_title |
670 DE-600 51.75 bkl Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate CFRP plate Wedge anchorage Pretensioned bolt Failure mode Tension test |
topic |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc CFRP plate misc Wedge anchorage misc Pretensioned bolt misc Failure mode misc Tension test |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc CFRP plate misc Wedge anchorage misc Pretensioned bolt misc Failure mode misc Tension test |
topic_browse |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc CFRP plate misc Wedge anchorage misc Pretensioned bolt misc Failure mode misc Tension test |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Composite structures |
hierarchy_parent_id |
320509044 |
dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Composite structures |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 |
title |
Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV002664216 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8 |
title_full |
Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
author_sort |
Ye, Huawen |
journal |
Composite structures |
journalStr |
Composite structures |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Ye, Huawen Zhang, Qing Liu, Changmeng Wu, Chuanjie Duan, Zhichao |
container_volume |
225 |
class |
670 DE-600 51.75 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Ye, Huawen |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 |
dewey-full |
670 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed cfrp plate |
title_auth |
Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
abstract |
An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. |
abstractGer |
An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. |
abstract_unstemmed |
An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zhang, Qing Liu, Changmeng Wu, Chuanjie Duan, Zhichao |
author2Str |
Zhang, Qing Liu, Changmeng Wu, Chuanjie Duan, Zhichao |
ppnlink |
320509044 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:02:01.473Z |
_version_ |
1803849901250969600 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002664216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524144526.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111142</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002664216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(19)31461-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ye, Huawen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Failure mechanisms governing anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorage for prestressed CFRP plate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">An efficient anchorage system is demanded for the Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) plates with various sizes in structure reinforcements. The short-term governing failure modes were studied experimentally and numerically in determining the anchoring force of friction-based wedge anchorages to fulfill for all failure criteria for different variables, including the barrel and wedge thickness, length of wedge corner cut, roughness of contact surface, and the pretension load. A series of anchorages were investigated using pull-off tests to obtain the maximum anchoring force and the sequence of failure modes. The anchorage behavior was then simulated by three-dimensional numerical models to attain the maximum anchoring force for each performance criterion under varying conditions. Both the sliding and interlaminar debonding, rather than the tensile rupture, were found to determine the maximum anchoring force of a compact anchorage in the specific range of the parameter values involved. The wide and thin CFRP plate in the anchorage zone was prone to interlaminar debonding and the narrow and thick one tended to sliding or rupture. The parametric studies demonstrated that the CFRP size, the friction coefficient, and the bolt pretension load have significant influences on the maximum anchoring force of the friction-based anchorages.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP plate</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wedge anchorage</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pretensioned bolt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Failure mode</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tension test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Qing</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Changmeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wu, Chuanjie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Duan, Zhichao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Composite structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">225</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320509044</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013177-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094531447</subfield><subfield code="x">0263-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:225</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="j">Verbundwerkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Schichtstoffe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">225</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399373 |