Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure
This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathem...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Xu, Yangli [verfasserIn] Zhang, Dongyun [verfasserIn] Hu, Songtao [verfasserIn] Chen, Runping [verfasserIn] Gu, Yilei [verfasserIn] Kong, Xiangsen [verfasserIn] Tao, Jiongming [verfasserIn] Jiang, Yijian [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008, 99, Seite 225-239 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:99 ; pages:225-239 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV002718308 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV002718308 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524152404.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV002718308 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
100 | 1 | |a Xu, Yangli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Topology optimization | |
650 | 4 | |a Selective laser melting | |
650 | 4 | |a Compressive behavior | |
650 | 4 | |a Dynamic elastic modulus | |
650 | 4 | |a Gibson-ashby model | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Dongyun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hu, Songtao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Runping |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gu, Yilei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kong, Xiangsen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tao, Jiongming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jiang, Yijian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 |g 99, Seite 225-239 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)538216727 |w (DE-600)2378381-3 |w (DE-576)271586761 |x 1878-0180 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:99 |g pages:225-239 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 99 |h 225-239 |
author_variant |
y x yx d z dz s h sh r c rc y g yg x k xk j t jt y j yj |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18780180:2019----::ehnclrprisalrnotplgotmzdnslcieaemligarc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 doi (DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Xu, Yangli verfasserin aut Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model Zhang, Dongyun verfasserin aut Hu, Songtao verfasserin aut Chen, Runping verfasserin aut Gu, Yilei verfasserin aut Kong, Xiangsen verfasserin aut Tao, Jiongming verfasserin aut Jiang, Yijian verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 99, Seite 225-239 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:99 pages:225-239 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 99 225-239 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 doi (DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Xu, Yangli verfasserin aut Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model Zhang, Dongyun verfasserin aut Hu, Songtao verfasserin aut Chen, Runping verfasserin aut Gu, Yilei verfasserin aut Kong, Xiangsen verfasserin aut Tao, Jiongming verfasserin aut Jiang, Yijian verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 99, Seite 225-239 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:99 pages:225-239 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 99 225-239 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 doi (DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Xu, Yangli verfasserin aut Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model Zhang, Dongyun verfasserin aut Hu, Songtao verfasserin aut Chen, Runping verfasserin aut Gu, Yilei verfasserin aut Kong, Xiangsen verfasserin aut Tao, Jiongming verfasserin aut Jiang, Yijian verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 99, Seite 225-239 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:99 pages:225-239 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 99 225-239 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 doi (DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Xu, Yangli verfasserin aut Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model Zhang, Dongyun verfasserin aut Hu, Songtao verfasserin aut Chen, Runping verfasserin aut Gu, Yilei verfasserin aut Kong, Xiangsen verfasserin aut Tao, Jiongming verfasserin aut Jiang, Yijian verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 99, Seite 225-239 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:99 pages:225-239 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 99 225-239 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 doi (DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Xu, Yangli verfasserin aut Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model Zhang, Dongyun verfasserin aut Hu, Songtao verfasserin aut Chen, Runping verfasserin aut Gu, Yilei verfasserin aut Kong, Xiangsen verfasserin aut Tao, Jiongming verfasserin aut Jiang, Yijian verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 99, Seite 225-239 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:99 pages:225-239 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 99 225-239 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 99, Seite 225-239 volume:99 pages:225-239 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 99, Seite 225-239 volume:99 pages:225-239 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Xu, Yangli @@aut@@ Zhang, Dongyun @@aut@@ Hu, Songtao @@aut@@ Chen, Runping @@aut@@ Gu, Yilei @@aut@@ Kong, Xiangsen @@aut@@ Tao, Jiongming @@aut@@ Jiang, Yijian @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
538216727 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
ELV002718308 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002718308</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524152404.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002718308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Yangli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Topology optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Selective laser melting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compressive behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dynamic elastic modulus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gibson-ashby model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Dongyun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Songtao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Runping</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Yilei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Xiangsen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Jiongming</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiang, Yijian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">99, Seite 225-239</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)538216727</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2378381-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271586761</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-0180</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:99</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">99</subfield><subfield code="h">225-239</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Xu, Yangli |
spellingShingle |
Xu, Yangli ddc 570 misc Topology optimization misc Selective laser melting misc Compressive behavior misc Dynamic elastic modulus misc Gibson-ashby model Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
authorStr |
Xu, Yangli |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)538216727 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1878-0180 |
topic_title |
570 DE-600 Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure Topology optimization Selective laser melting Compressive behavior Dynamic elastic modulus Gibson-ashby model |
topic |
ddc 570 misc Topology optimization misc Selective laser melting misc Compressive behavior misc Dynamic elastic modulus misc Gibson-ashby model |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 misc Topology optimization misc Selective laser melting misc Compressive behavior misc Dynamic elastic modulus misc Gibson-ashby model |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 misc Topology optimization misc Selective laser melting misc Compressive behavior misc Dynamic elastic modulus misc Gibson-ashby model |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
hierarchy_parent_id |
538216727 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 |
title |
Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV002718308 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5 |
title_full |
Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
author_sort |
Xu, Yangli |
journal |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
journalStr |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
225 |
author_browse |
Xu, Yangli Zhang, Dongyun Hu, Songtao Chen, Runping Gu, Yilei Kong, Xiangsen Tao, Jiongming Jiang, Yijian |
container_volume |
99 |
class |
570 DE-600 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Xu, Yangli |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 |
dewey-full |
570 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated ti6al4v lattice structure |
title_auth |
Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
abstract |
This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. |
abstractGer |
This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Zhang, Dongyun Hu, Songtao Chen, Runping Gu, Yilei Kong, Xiangsen Tao, Jiongming Jiang, Yijian |
author2Str |
Zhang, Dongyun Hu, Songtao Chen, Runping Gu, Yilei Kong, Xiangsen Tao, Jiongming Jiang, Yijian |
ppnlink |
538216727 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:13:06.035Z |
_version_ |
1803850598095781888 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV002718308</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524152404.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230429s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.021</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV002718308</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30465-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Yangli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mechanical properties tailoring of topology optimized and selective laser melting fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper investigates the effect of porosity and unit cell size variation in topology optimized (TOP) and selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated Ti6Al4V lattice structure on the mechanical properties including compressive strength, failure mechanism and dynamic elastic modulus. Meanwhile, mathematical relations between mechanical properties and geometric parameters are obtained based on Gibson-Ashby model. The results show that both ultimate compressive strength (σ = 23∼498 MPa) and dynamic elastic modulus (E = 3.5∼55.47 GPa) of TOP lattice structures gradually decrease with the increase in porosity and unit cell size. The analysis combining experimental and numerical results indicates that TOP lattice structures are elastic-brittle porous material and have two failure mechanisms. The numerical predicted stress-strain curves are compared with the experimental ones. The numerical models incorporating the Johnson-Cook damage model could predict the slip direction of 45° failure band and ultimate compressive strength. Classical Gibson-Ashby model was used to predict the relation between relative density and mechanical properties of lattice structures. The exponential factors (n) of fitted models are obviously affected by unit cell size, which are determined by the number of unit cells in compressive test and SLM manufacturability in dynamic elastic modulus test. A 3D Modulus-Density-Unit Cell Size model is innovatively proposed, which can provide theoretical basis of tailoring orthopedic implant filled with functional gradient TOP lattice structures.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Topology optimization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Selective laser melting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Compressive behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dynamic elastic modulus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gibson-ashby model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Dongyun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hu, Songtao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Runping</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gu, Yilei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kong, Xiangsen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tao, Jiongming</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jiang, Yijian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">99, Seite 225-239</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)538216727</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2378381-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271586761</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-0180</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:99</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:225-239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">99</subfield><subfield code="h">225-239</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399102 |