Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest

Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Galbraith, Sara M. [verfasserIn] Cane, James H. [verfasserIn] Moldenke, Andrew R. [verfasserIn] Rivers, James W. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Forest ecology and management - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976, 453
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:453

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622

Katalog-ID:	ELV003040364

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV003040364
003	DE-627
005	20230524154702.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230430s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV003040364
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 570 \|a 630 \|a 640 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 23 \|a 12 \|2 ssgn
084			\|a 48.00 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Galbraith, Sara M. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.
650		4	\|a Bees
650		4	\|a Mixed-conifer forest
650		4	\|a Pollinators
650		4	\|a Salvage logging
650		4	\|a High-severity wildfire
700	1		\|a Cane, James H. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Moldenke, Andrew R. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Rivers, James W. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Forest ecology and management \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 \|g 453 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)320572463 \|w (DE-600)2016648-5 \|w (DE-576)090956303 \|x 0378-1127 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:453
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a SSG-OPC-FOR
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 48.00 \|j Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 453

Indexfelder

author_variant	s m g sm smg j h c jh jhc a r m ar arm j w r jw jwr
matchkey_str	article:03781127:2019----::avglgigeuewlbeiestbtoaudneneeey
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
bklnumber	48.00
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 doi (DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Galbraith, Sara M. verfasserin aut Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes. Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire Cane, James H. verfasserin aut Moldenke, Andrew R. verfasserin aut Rivers, James W. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 453 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303 0378-1127 nnns volume:453 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 453
spelling	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 doi (DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Galbraith, Sara M. verfasserin aut Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes. Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire Cane, James H. verfasserin aut Moldenke, Andrew R. verfasserin aut Rivers, James W. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 453 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303 0378-1127 nnns volume:453 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 453
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 doi (DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Galbraith, Sara M. verfasserin aut Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes. Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire Cane, James H. verfasserin aut Moldenke, Andrew R. verfasserin aut Rivers, James W. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 453 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303 0378-1127 nnns volume:453 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 453
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 doi (DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Galbraith, Sara M. verfasserin aut Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes. Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire Cane, James H. verfasserin aut Moldenke, Andrew R. verfasserin aut Rivers, James W. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 453 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303 0378-1127 nnns volume:453 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 453
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622 doi (DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Galbraith, Sara M. verfasserin aut Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes. Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire Cane, James H. verfasserin aut Moldenke, Andrew R. verfasserin aut Rivers, James W. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Forest ecology and management Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976 453 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303 0378-1127 nnns volume:453 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.00 Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines AR 453
language	English
source	Enthalten in Forest ecology and management 453 volume:453
sourceStr	Enthalten in Forest ecology and management 453 volume:453
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire
dewey-raw	570
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Forest ecology and management
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Galbraith, Sara M. @@aut@@ Cane, James H. @@aut@@ Moldenke, Andrew R. @@aut@@ Rivers, James W. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	320572463
dewey-sort	3570
id	ELV003040364
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV003040364</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524154702.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230430s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV003040364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">23</subfield><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Galbraith, Sara M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mixed-conifer forest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pollinators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvage logging</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">High-severity wildfire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cane, James H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moldenke, Andrew R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rivers, James W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Forest ecology and management</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">453</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320572463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2016648-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090956303</subfield><subfield code="x">0378-1127</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">453</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Galbraith, Sara M.
spellingShingle	Galbraith, Sara M. ddc 570 ssgn 23 bkl 48.00 misc Bees misc Mixed-conifer forest misc Pollinators misc Salvage logging misc High-severity wildfire Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
authorStr	Galbraith, Sara M.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)320572463
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0378-1127
topic_title	570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest Bees Mixed-conifer forest Pollinators Salvage logging High-severity wildfire
topic	ddc 570 ssgn 23 bkl 48.00 misc Bees misc Mixed-conifer forest misc Pollinators misc Salvage logging misc High-severity wildfire
topic_unstemmed	ddc 570 ssgn 23 bkl 48.00 misc Bees misc Mixed-conifer forest misc Pollinators misc Salvage logging misc High-severity wildfire
topic_browse	ddc 570 ssgn 23 bkl 48.00 misc Bees misc Mixed-conifer forest misc Pollinators misc Salvage logging misc High-severity wildfire
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Forest ecology and management
hierarchy_parent_id	320572463
dewey-tens	570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management
hierarchy_top_title	Forest ecology and management
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)320572463 (DE-600)2016648-5 (DE-576)090956303
title	Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV003040364 (ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3
title_full	Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
author_sort	Galbraith, Sara M.
journal	Forest ecology and management
journalStr	Forest ecology and management
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	500 - Science 600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Galbraith, Sara M. Cane, James H. Moldenke, Andrew R. Rivers, James W.
container_volume	453
class	570 630 640 DE-600 23 12 ssgn 48.00 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Galbraith, Sara M.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622
dewey-full	570 630 640
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
title_auth	Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
abstract	Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.
abstractGer	Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.
abstract_unstemmed	Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA SSG-OPC-FOR GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest
remote_bool	true
author2	Cane, James H. Moldenke, Andrew R. Rivers, James W.
author2Str	Cane, James H. Moldenke, Andrew R. Rivers, James W.
ppnlink	320572463
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622
up_date	2024-07-06T18:17:40.151Z
_version_	1803854660398743552
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV003040364</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524154702.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230430s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117622</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV003040364</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0378-1127(19)31016-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">23</subfield><subfield code="a">12</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Galbraith, Sara M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Natural disturbances are critical for supporting biodiversity in many ecosystems, but subsequent management actions can influence the quality of habitat that follow these events. Post-disturbance salvage logging has negative consequences on certain components of forest biodiversity, but populations of some early seral-adapted organisms may be maintained in salvage-logged areas. We investigated the influence of an essential group of pollinators – wild bees – to recent post-wildfire salvage logging within managed mixed-conifer forest in the Pacific Northwest. We compared bee diversity (i.e., bee abundance, species richness, alpha diversity, and beta diversity) and habitat features (i.e., floral resources and available nesting substrates) in salvage-logged areas to unlogged sites, both of which experienced high-severity wildfire. Although we found no evidence for differences in bee abundance between salvage-logged and unlogged sites, interpolated estimates of species richness and both interpolated and extrapolated estimates of alpha diversity were greater in unlogged sites. Additionally, beta diversity was greater in unlogged sites when equal weight was given to rare species. Salvage logging did not select for specific functional groups of bees, as both logged and unlogged sites were dominated by generalist, social species that nest in the ground. However, habitat conditions for bees were influenced by salvage logging: flowering plant density was greater in salvage-logged sites during the latter half of the season, with fewer conifer snags and more woody debris than were available in unlogged sites. Our study indicates that salvage logging can support wild bee abundance, but that unlogged patches of severely burned forest supports slightly greater bee diversity within fire-prone mixed-conifer landscapes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mixed-conifer forest</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pollinators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Salvage logging</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">High-severity wildfire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cane, James H.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moldenke, Andrew R.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rivers, James W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Forest ecology and management</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">453</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320572463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2016648-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)090956303</subfield><subfield code="x">0378-1127</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:453</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-FOR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Land- und Forstwirtschaft: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">453</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4027634

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Salvage logging reduces wild bee diversity, but not abundance, in severely burned mixed-conifer forest

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?