Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints?
Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Schroeder, Stefan [verfasserIn] Braun, Steffen [verfasserIn] Mueller, Ulrike [verfasserIn] Vogel, Matthias [verfasserIn] Sonntag, Robert [verfasserIn] Jaeger, Sebastian [verfasserIn] Kretzer, Jan Philippe [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2019 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008, 101 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:101 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV003213773 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV003213773 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524152343.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230430s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV003213773 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
100 | 1 | |a Schroeder, Stefan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Rotating hinged knee | |
650 | 4 | |a CFR-PEEK | |
650 | 4 | |a Wear | |
650 | 4 | |a Bushings | |
650 | 4 | |a CoCr | |
700 | 1 | |a Braun, Steffen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mueller, Ulrike |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vogel, Matthias |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sonntag, Robert |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jaeger, Sebastian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kretzer, Jan Philippe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 |g 101 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)538216727 |w (DE-600)2378381-3 |w (DE-576)271586761 |x 1878-0180 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:101 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 101 |
author_variant |
s s ss s b sb u m um m v mv r s rs s j sj j p k jp jpk |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18780180:2019----::abnirrifrepeaatraieaeilofeinuhnsf |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
publishDate |
2019 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 doi (DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Schroeder, Stefan verfasserin aut Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr Braun, Steffen verfasserin aut Mueller, Ulrike verfasserin aut Vogel, Matthias verfasserin aut Sonntag, Robert verfasserin aut Jaeger, Sebastian verfasserin aut Kretzer, Jan Philippe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 101 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:101 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 101 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 doi (DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Schroeder, Stefan verfasserin aut Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr Braun, Steffen verfasserin aut Mueller, Ulrike verfasserin aut Vogel, Matthias verfasserin aut Sonntag, Robert verfasserin aut Jaeger, Sebastian verfasserin aut Kretzer, Jan Philippe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 101 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:101 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 101 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 doi (DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Schroeder, Stefan verfasserin aut Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr Braun, Steffen verfasserin aut Mueller, Ulrike verfasserin aut Vogel, Matthias verfasserin aut Sonntag, Robert verfasserin aut Jaeger, Sebastian verfasserin aut Kretzer, Jan Philippe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 101 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:101 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 101 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 doi (DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Schroeder, Stefan verfasserin aut Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr Braun, Steffen verfasserin aut Mueller, Ulrike verfasserin aut Vogel, Matthias verfasserin aut Sonntag, Robert verfasserin aut Jaeger, Sebastian verfasserin aut Kretzer, Jan Philippe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 101 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:101 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 101 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 doi (DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 570 DE-600 Schroeder, Stefan verfasserin aut Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr Braun, Steffen verfasserin aut Mueller, Ulrike verfasserin aut Vogel, Matthias verfasserin aut Sonntag, Robert verfasserin aut Jaeger, Sebastian verfasserin aut Kretzer, Jan Philippe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008 101 Online-Ressource (DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 1878-0180 nnns volume:101 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 AR 101 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 101 volume:101 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 101 volume:101 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr |
dewey-raw |
570 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schroeder, Stefan @@aut@@ Braun, Steffen @@aut@@ Mueller, Ulrike @@aut@@ Vogel, Matthias @@aut@@ Sonntag, Robert @@aut@@ Jaeger, Sebastian @@aut@@ Kretzer, Jan Philippe @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
538216727 |
dewey-sort |
3570 |
id |
ELV003213773 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV003213773</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524152343.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230430s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV003213773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schroeder, Stefan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rotating hinged knee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFR-PEEK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bushings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CoCr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Braun, Steffen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mueller, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vogel, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sonntag, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaeger, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kretzer, Jan Philippe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">101</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)538216727</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2378381-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271586761</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-0180</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">101</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Schroeder, Stefan |
spellingShingle |
Schroeder, Stefan ddc 570 misc Rotating hinged knee misc CFR-PEEK misc Wear misc Bushings misc CoCr Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
authorStr |
Schroeder, Stefan |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)538216727 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1878-0180 |
topic_title |
570 DE-600 Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? Rotating hinged knee CFR-PEEK Wear Bushings CoCr |
topic |
ddc 570 misc Rotating hinged knee misc CFR-PEEK misc Wear misc Bushings misc CoCr |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 misc Rotating hinged knee misc CFR-PEEK misc Wear misc Bushings misc CoCr |
topic_browse |
ddc 570 misc Rotating hinged knee misc CFR-PEEK misc Wear misc Bushings misc CoCr |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
hierarchy_parent_id |
538216727 |
dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)538216727 (DE-600)2378381-3 (DE-576)271586761 |
title |
Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV003213773 (ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2 |
title_full |
Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
author_sort |
Schroeder, Stefan |
journal |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
journalStr |
Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2019 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Schroeder, Stefan Braun, Steffen Mueller, Ulrike Vogel, Matthias Sonntag, Robert Jaeger, Sebastian Kretzer, Jan Philippe |
container_volume |
101 |
class |
570 DE-600 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Schroeder, Stefan |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 |
dewey-full |
570 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
carbon-fibre-reinforced peek: an alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
title_auth |
Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
abstract |
Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. |
abstractGer |
Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints? |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Braun, Steffen Mueller, Ulrike Vogel, Matthias Sonntag, Robert Jaeger, Sebastian Kretzer, Jan Philippe |
author2Str |
Braun, Steffen Mueller, Ulrike Vogel, Matthias Sonntag, Robert Jaeger, Sebastian Kretzer, Jan Philippe |
ppnlink |
538216727 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:52:29.309Z |
_version_ |
1803856851040731136 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV003213773</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524152343.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230430s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103434</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV003213773</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1751-6161(19)30650-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schroeder, Stefan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Carbon-fibre-reinforced PEEK: An alternative material for flexion bushings of rotating hinged knee joints?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background: For prosthetic knee joints of the hinged type, typically polyethylene (PE) flexion bushings are used between axis and femoral component to prevent metallic wear. Nevertheless, PE-wear can lead to periprosthetic osteolysis followed by aseptic loosening of the implant. Based on high creep and wear resistance carbon-fibre-reinforced polyether ether ketones (CFR-PEEKs) could provide an alternative material to ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for this bearing type.Methods: Flexion bushings of four different materials were investigated (CFR-PEEK pitch fibres, CFR-PEEK PAN fibres, virgin PEEK without carbon fibres and UHMWPE) using a bushing tester. For determination of the polymeric and metallic wear, gravimetric measurements and particle analyses were performed.Results: The polymeric wear rates of CFR-PEEK PAN (6.657 ± 0.714 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (32.085 ± 2.748 mg/106 cycles) were significantly higher compared to the polymeric wear rates of virgin PEEK (0.764 ± 0.283 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (−0.015 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). In addition, the metallic wear rates were significantly higher when using bushings made of CFR-PEEK PAN (3.373 ± 0.214 mg/106 cycles) and CFR-PEEK pitch (3.604 ± 0.355 mg/106 cycles), than when using bushings made of virgin PEEK (0.177 ± 0.049 mg/106 cycles) or UHMWPE (0.031 ± 0.011 mg/106 cycles) (p < .001). The mean particle size of the two CFR-PEEK groups was significantly smaller compared to the virgin PEEK and UHMWPE group (p < .001).Conclusion: According to these results, the clinical use of CFR-PEEK in combination with CoCr could lead to higher wear rates and this should be avoided. Virgin PEEK may still be considered as an alternative to UHMWPE to use it for flexion bushings in a hinged knee joint.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rotating hinged knee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFR-PEEK</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wear</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bushings</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CoCr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Braun, Steffen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mueller, Ulrike</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vogel, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sonntag, Robert</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jaeger, Sebastian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kretzer, Jan Philippe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">101</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)538216727</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2378381-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)271586761</subfield><subfield code="x">1878-0180</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">101</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.398549 |