Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively?
Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Kent, William T. [verfasserIn] Whitchurch, Theresa [verfasserIn] Siow, Matthew [verfasserIn] Mitchell, Brendon [verfasserIn] Chun, Liane [verfasserIn] Bardesi, Jameel [verfasserIn] Huang, Brady [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Injury - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969, 51, Seite 2648-2651 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; pages:2648-2651 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV004894200 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV004894200 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230524162348.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230503s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV004894200 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 44.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kent, William T. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Intertrochanteric fracture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Greater trochanteric fracture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intertrochanteric extension | |
| 650 | 4 | |a MRI | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Whitchurch, Theresa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Siow, Matthew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mitchell, Brendon |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chun, Liane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bardesi, Jameel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Brady |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Injury |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 |g 51, Seite 2648-2651 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320497615 |w (DE-600)2011808-9 |w (DE-576)098614983 |x 1879-0267 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g pages:2648-2651 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.80 |j Unfallmedizin |j Notfallmedizin |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 51 |h 2648-2651 | ||
| author_variant |
w t k wt wtk t w tw m s ms b m bm l c lc j b jb b h bh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18790267:2020----::raetohneifatrsihnetohneietnindniidnrwaiteaefip |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| bklnumber |
44.80 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 doi (DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Kent, William T. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 aut Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI Whitchurch, Theresa verfasserin aut Siow, Matthew verfasserin aut Mitchell, Brendon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 aut Chun, Liane verfasserin aut Bardesi, Jameel verfasserin aut Huang, Brady verfasserin aut Enthalten in Injury Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 51, Seite 2648-2651 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 1879-0267 nnns volume:51 pages:2648-2651 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.80 Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin AR 51 2648-2651 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 doi (DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Kent, William T. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 aut Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI Whitchurch, Theresa verfasserin aut Siow, Matthew verfasserin aut Mitchell, Brendon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 aut Chun, Liane verfasserin aut Bardesi, Jameel verfasserin aut Huang, Brady verfasserin aut Enthalten in Injury Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 51, Seite 2648-2651 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 1879-0267 nnns volume:51 pages:2648-2651 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.80 Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin AR 51 2648-2651 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 doi (DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Kent, William T. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 aut Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI Whitchurch, Theresa verfasserin aut Siow, Matthew verfasserin aut Mitchell, Brendon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 aut Chun, Liane verfasserin aut Bardesi, Jameel verfasserin aut Huang, Brady verfasserin aut Enthalten in Injury Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 51, Seite 2648-2651 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 1879-0267 nnns volume:51 pages:2648-2651 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.80 Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin AR 51 2648-2651 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 doi (DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Kent, William T. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 aut Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI Whitchurch, Theresa verfasserin aut Siow, Matthew verfasserin aut Mitchell, Brendon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 aut Chun, Liane verfasserin aut Bardesi, Jameel verfasserin aut Huang, Brady verfasserin aut Enthalten in Injury Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 51, Seite 2648-2651 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 1879-0267 nnns volume:51 pages:2648-2651 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.80 Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin AR 51 2648-2651 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 doi (DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Kent, William T. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 aut Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI Whitchurch, Theresa verfasserin aut Siow, Matthew verfasserin aut Mitchell, Brendon verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 aut Chun, Liane verfasserin aut Bardesi, Jameel verfasserin aut Huang, Brady verfasserin aut Enthalten in Injury Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969 51, Seite 2648-2651 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 1879-0267 nnns volume:51 pages:2648-2651 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.80 Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin AR 51 2648-2651 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Injury 51, Seite 2648-2651 volume:51 pages:2648-2651 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Injury 51, Seite 2648-2651 volume:51 pages:2648-2651 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Unfallmedizin Notfallmedizin |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Injury |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Kent, William T. @@aut@@ Whitchurch, Theresa @@aut@@ Siow, Matthew @@aut@@ Mitchell, Brendon @@aut@@ Chun, Liane @@aut@@ Bardesi, Jameel @@aut@@ Huang, Brady @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
320497615 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV004894200 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV004894200</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524162348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV004894200</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kent, William T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intertrochanteric fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greater trochanteric fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intertrochanteric extension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MRI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitchurch, Theresa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siow, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mitchell, Brendon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chun, Liane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bardesi, Jameel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Brady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Injury</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">51, Seite 2648-2651</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320497615</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2011808-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098614983</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-0267</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2648-2651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Unfallmedizin</subfield><subfield code="j">Notfallmedizin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="h">2648-2651</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Kent, William T. |
| spellingShingle |
Kent, William T. ddc 610 bkl 44.80 misc Intertrochanteric fracture misc Greater trochanteric fracture misc Intertrochanteric extension misc MRI Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| authorStr |
Kent, William T. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320497615 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
1879-0267 |
| topic_title |
610 DE-600 44.80 bkl Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? Intertrochanteric fracture Greater trochanteric fracture Intertrochanteric extension MRI |
| topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.80 misc Intertrochanteric fracture misc Greater trochanteric fracture misc Intertrochanteric extension misc MRI |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.80 misc Intertrochanteric fracture misc Greater trochanteric fracture misc Intertrochanteric extension misc MRI |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.80 misc Intertrochanteric fracture misc Greater trochanteric fracture misc Intertrochanteric extension misc MRI |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Injury |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
320497615 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Injury |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320497615 (DE-600)2011808-9 (DE-576)098614983 |
| title |
Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV004894200 (ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0 |
| title_full |
Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| author_sort |
Kent, William T. |
| journal |
Injury |
| journalStr |
Injury |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
2648 |
| author_browse |
Kent, William T. Whitchurch, Theresa Siow, Matthew Mitchell, Brendon Chun, Liane Bardesi, Jameel Huang, Brady |
| container_volume |
51 |
| class |
610 DE-600 44.80 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Kent, William T. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0002-7065-9551 (ORCID)0000-0003-2912-7569 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551 (orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569 |
| dewey-full |
610 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on mri: what is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| title_auth |
Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| abstract |
Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV |
| abstractGer |
Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
| title_short |
Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively? |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Whitchurch, Theresa Siow, Matthew Mitchell, Brendon Chun, Liane Bardesi, Jameel Huang, Brady |
| author2Str |
Whitchurch, Theresa Siow, Matthew Mitchell, Brendon Chun, Liane Bardesi, Jameel Huang, Brady |
| ppnlink |
320497615 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002 |
| up_date |
2024-07-07T00:29:53.589Z |
| _version_ |
1803878078706876416 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV004894200</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524162348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.injury.2020.08.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV004894200</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0020-1383(20)30655-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kent, William T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-7065-9551</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Greater trochanteric fractures with lntertrochanteric extension identified on MRI: What is the rate of displacement when treated nonoperatively?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: . Despite the ability of MRI to identify intertrochanteric (IT) fracture extension for greater trochanteric (GT) fractures, there is no consensus about which fractures require operative intervention. Previous studies have suggested GT fractures with >50% extension into the IT region might benefit from fixation. We sought to evaluate the rate at which GT fractures with IT extension displaced, requiring operative fixation.Patients and methods: . This is a Retrospective Chart Review performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patients included all nonoperatively treated GT fractures (OTA/AO 31A1.1) with IT extension identified on MRI between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Patients lost to follow up prior to radiographic evidence of healing or fracture displacement were excluded. Patient charts and imaging were reviewed for demographic data, treatment plan, percent extension into the IT region (as determined from coronal MRI images), and clinical and radiographic evidence of fracture healing. Percent extension into the IT region was measured using coronal T1-weighted MRI images. The primary outcome measures were fracture displacement requiring operation and nonunion.Results: . Seventeen patients met initial inclusion criteria, with two subsequently excluded due to no radiographic follow-up. Of the 15 patients, zero had displacement of their IT fracture. None required operative intervention. All 15 patients healed their fractures. Fourteen of 15 (93%) had IT extension of 50% or less across the IT region. One patient had initial IT extension of 60%, this patient also healed without displacement.Discussion: . Incomplete intertrochanteric femur fractures are a relatively newer diagnosis that have become more prevalent with the increased usage and availability of MRI. Currently, there is no consensus on the ideal treatment of these injuries. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of its kind to help guide treatment of these GT fractures with IT extension.Conclusions: . Fractures with less than 50% extension into the IT region have a low likelihood of future displacement and high union rates when treated nonoperatively.Level of evidence: . IV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intertrochanteric fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Greater trochanteric fracture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intertrochanteric extension</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MRI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitchurch, Theresa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Siow, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mitchell, Brendon</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2912-7569</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chun, Liane</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bardesi, Jameel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Huang, Brady</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Injury</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1969</subfield><subfield code="g">51, Seite 2648-2651</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320497615</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2011808-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098614983</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-0267</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2648-2651</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Unfallmedizin</subfield><subfield code="j">Notfallmedizin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="h">2648-2651</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399617 |