How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study

Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Wong, Tony T. [verfasserIn] Weeks, Joanna K. [verfasserIn] Ahmed, Firas S. [verfasserIn] Francescone, Mark A. [verfasserIn] Rasiej, Michael J. [verfasserIn] Liu, Michael Z. [verfasserIn] Kazam, Jonathan K. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2019

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Current problems in diagnostic radiology - New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976, 50, Seite 48-53
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:50 ; pages:48-53

DOI / URN:	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010

Katalog-ID:	ELV005146216

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV005146216
003	DE-627
005	20230524164416.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230503s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV005146216
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 610 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 44.64 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Wong, Tony T. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.
700	1		\|a Weeks, Joanna K. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Ahmed, Firas S. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Francescone, Mark A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Rasiej, Michael J. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Liu, Michael Z. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Kazam, Jonathan K. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Current problems in diagnostic radiology \|d New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 \|g 50, Seite 48-53 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)331742179 \|w (DE-600)2052052-9 \|w (DE-576)26442445X \|x 1535-6302 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:50 \|g pages:48-53
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 44.64 \|j Radiologie
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 50 \|h 48-53

Indexfelder

author_variant	t t w tt ttw j k w jk jkw f s a fs fsa m a f ma maf m j r mj mjr m z l mz mzl j k k jk jkk
matchkey_str	article:15356302:2019----::omnrdorpsostaeocenofmrlamrhl
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
bklnumber	44.64
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 doi (DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.64 bkl Wong, Tony T. verfasserin aut How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology. Weeks, Joanna K. verfasserin aut Ahmed, Firas S. verfasserin aut Francescone, Mark A. verfasserin aut Rasiej, Michael J. verfasserin aut Liu, Michael Z. verfasserin aut Kazam, Jonathan K. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 50, Seite 48-53 Online-Ressource (DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X 1535-6302 nnns volume:50 pages:48-53 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.64 Radiologie AR 50 48-53
spelling	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 doi (DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.64 bkl Wong, Tony T. verfasserin aut How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology. Weeks, Joanna K. verfasserin aut Ahmed, Firas S. verfasserin aut Francescone, Mark A. verfasserin aut Rasiej, Michael J. verfasserin aut Liu, Michael Z. verfasserin aut Kazam, Jonathan K. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 50, Seite 48-53 Online-Ressource (DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X 1535-6302 nnns volume:50 pages:48-53 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.64 Radiologie AR 50 48-53
allfields_unstemmed	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 doi (DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.64 bkl Wong, Tony T. verfasserin aut How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology. Weeks, Joanna K. verfasserin aut Ahmed, Firas S. verfasserin aut Francescone, Mark A. verfasserin aut Rasiej, Michael J. verfasserin aut Liu, Michael Z. verfasserin aut Kazam, Jonathan K. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 50, Seite 48-53 Online-Ressource (DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X 1535-6302 nnns volume:50 pages:48-53 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.64 Radiologie AR 50 48-53
allfieldsGer	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 doi (DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.64 bkl Wong, Tony T. verfasserin aut How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology. Weeks, Joanna K. verfasserin aut Ahmed, Firas S. verfasserin aut Francescone, Mark A. verfasserin aut Rasiej, Michael J. verfasserin aut Liu, Michael Z. verfasserin aut Kazam, Jonathan K. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 50, Seite 48-53 Online-Ressource (DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X 1535-6302 nnns volume:50 pages:48-53 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.64 Radiologie AR 50 48-53
allfieldsSound	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010 doi (DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.64 bkl Wong, Tony T. verfasserin aut How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study 2019 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology. Weeks, Joanna K. verfasserin aut Ahmed, Firas S. verfasserin aut Francescone, Mark A. verfasserin aut Rasiej, Michael J. verfasserin aut Liu, Michael Z. verfasserin aut Kazam, Jonathan K. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976 50, Seite 48-53 Online-Ressource (DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X 1535-6302 nnns volume:50 pages:48-53 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.64 Radiologie AR 50 48-53
language	English
source	Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology 50, Seite 48-53 volume:50 pages:48-53
sourceStr	Enthalten in Current problems in diagnostic radiology 50, Seite 48-53 volume:50 pages:48-53
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Radiologie
institution	findex.gbv.de
dewey-raw	610
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Current problems in diagnostic radiology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Wong, Tony T. @@aut@@ Weeks, Joanna K. @@aut@@ Ahmed, Firas S. @@aut@@ Francescone, Mark A. @@aut@@ Rasiej, Michael J. @@aut@@ Liu, Michael Z. @@aut@@ Kazam, Jonathan K. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	331742179
dewey-sort	3610
id	ELV005146216
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005146216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524164416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005146216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wong, Tony T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weeks, Joanna K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmed, Firas S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Francescone, Mark A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rasiej, Michael J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Michael Z.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kazam, Jonathan K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Current problems in diagnostic radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">50, Seite 48-53</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331742179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2052052-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)26442445X</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-6302</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="j">Radiologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="h">48-53</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Wong, Tony T.
spellingShingle	Wong, Tony T. ddc 610 bkl 44.64 How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
authorStr	Wong, Tony T.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)331742179
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1535-6302
topic_title	610 DE-600 44.64 bkl How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
topic	ddc 610 bkl 44.64
topic_unstemmed	ddc 610 bkl 44.64
topic_browse	ddc 610 bkl 44.64
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Current problems in diagnostic radiology
hierarchy_parent_id	331742179
dewey-tens	610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	Current problems in diagnostic radiology
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)331742179 (DE-600)2052052-9 (DE-576)26442445X
title	How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV005146216 (ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6
title_full	How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
author_sort	Wong, Tony T.
journal	Current problems in diagnostic radiology
journalStr	Current problems in diagnostic radiology
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	48
author_browse	Wong, Tony T. Weeks, Joanna K. Ahmed, Firas S. Francescone, Mark A. Rasiej, Michael J. Liu, Michael Z. Kazam, Jonathan K.
container_volume	50
class	610 DE-600 44.64 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Wong, Tony T.
doi_str_mv	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010
dewey-full	610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	how many radiographs does it take to screen for femoral cam morphology?: a noninferiority study
title_auth	How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
abstract	Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.
abstractGer	Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.
abstract_unstemmed	Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study
remote_bool	true
author2	Weeks, Joanna K. Ahmed, Firas S. Francescone, Mark A. Rasiej, Michael J. Liu, Michael Z. Kazam, Jonathan K.
author2Str	Weeks, Joanna K. Ahmed, Firas S. Francescone, Mark A. Rasiej, Michael J. Liu, Michael Z. Kazam, Jonathan K.
ppnlink	331742179
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010
up_date	2024-07-06T16:58:14.362Z
_version_	1803849663106777088
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005146216</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524164416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230503s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.07.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005146216</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0363-0188(19)30144-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wong, Tony T.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: To compare a 2-view radiograph series (AP of the pelvis and 45° Dunn of the hip) with a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients with a 5-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and AP, 45° Dunn, frog lateral, and false profile of the affected hip) from 2016 to 2017. Three fellowship trained radiologists blindly and independently evaluated 2 views (AP pelvis and Dunn) for a femoral cam lesion, acetabular rim calcification, Tonnis grade, and important incidental findings. Two weeks later, the same assessment was made on all 5 views. A noninferiority test of the 2-view series vs the 5-view series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology was conducted. Individual reader sensitivity calculations were performed and agreement was determined with the kappa statistic.Results: The 2-view series was noninferior to the 5-view series for cam identification (P value = 0.010). In comparing the 2-view vs 5-view series for individual readers, there was no difference in the sensitivities (84%-100% vs 85%-98%, P = 0.85-1.0) or specificities (11%-56% vs 7%-56%, P = 0.58-1.0) for cam identification. There was fair to excellent 2-view intrareader agreement (k = 0.38-0.93) and similar inter-reader agreement between the 2-view and 5-view (k = 0.33 vs 0.37).Conclusions: A 2-view radiograph series (AP pelvis and Dunn hip) is noninferior to a 5-view radiograph series for sensitivity in identifying femoral cam morphology.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weeks, Joanna K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmed, Firas S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Francescone, Mark A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rasiej, Michael J.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, Michael Z.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kazam, Jonathan K.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Current problems in diagnostic radiology</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Elsevier, 1976</subfield><subfield code="g">50, Seite 48-53</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331742179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2052052-9</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)26442445X</subfield><subfield code="x">1535-6302</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:50</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.64</subfield><subfield code="j">Radiologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">50</subfield><subfield code="h">48-53</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4017324

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

How Many Radiographs Does It Take to Screen for Femoral Cam Morphology?: A Noninferiority Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?