Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes
Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was c...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Pereyra, Marcos S. [verfasserIn] Argüello, Juan A. [verfasserIn] Bima, Paula I. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2020 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Industrial crops and products - New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992, 161 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:161 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV005512573 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV005512573 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524143906.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230504s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV005512573 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |a 640 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 48.30 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pereyra, Marcos S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Waterlogging stress | |
650 | 4 | |a Drought stress | |
650 | 4 | |a Quiescence strategy | |
650 | 4 | |a Escape strategy | |
650 | 4 | |a Dehydration avoidance strategy | |
700 | 1 | |a Argüello, Juan A. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bima, Paula I. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Industrial crops and products |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 |g 161 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300894678 |w (DE-600)1483245-8 |w (DE-576)259270792 |x 1872-633X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:161 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 48.30 |j Natürliche Ressourcen |x Land- und Forstwirtschaft |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 161 |
author_variant |
m s p ms msp j a a ja jaa p i b pi pib |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1872633X:2020----::eoyeeednacietrlnpyilgclepnerglttetaeisfwoeaoutvr |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
bklnumber |
48.30 |
publishDate |
2020 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 doi (DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Pereyra, Marcos S. verfasserin aut Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy Argüello, Juan A. verfasserin aut Bima, Paula I. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Industrial crops and products New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 161 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 1872-633X nnns volume:161 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.30 Natürliche Ressourcen Land- und Forstwirtschaft AR 161 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 doi (DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Pereyra, Marcos S. verfasserin aut Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy Argüello, Juan A. verfasserin aut Bima, Paula I. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Industrial crops and products New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 161 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 1872-633X nnns volume:161 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.30 Natürliche Ressourcen Land- und Forstwirtschaft AR 161 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 doi (DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Pereyra, Marcos S. verfasserin aut Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy Argüello, Juan A. verfasserin aut Bima, Paula I. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Industrial crops and products New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 161 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 1872-633X nnns volume:161 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.30 Natürliche Ressourcen Land- und Forstwirtschaft AR 161 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 doi (DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Pereyra, Marcos S. verfasserin aut Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy Argüello, Juan A. verfasserin aut Bima, Paula I. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Industrial crops and products New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 161 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 1872-633X nnns volume:161 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.30 Natürliche Ressourcen Land- und Forstwirtschaft AR 161 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 doi (DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Pereyra, Marcos S. verfasserin aut Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes 2020 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy Argüello, Juan A. verfasserin aut Bima, Paula I. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Industrial crops and products New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992 161 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 1872-633X nnns volume:161 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 48.30 Natürliche Ressourcen Land- und Forstwirtschaft AR 161 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Industrial crops and products 161 volume:161 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Industrial crops and products 161 volume:161 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Natürliche Ressourcen |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy |
dewey-raw |
630 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Industrial crops and products |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pereyra, Marcos S. @@aut@@ Argüello, Juan A. @@aut@@ Bima, Paula I. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
300894678 |
dewey-sort |
3630 |
id |
ELV005512573 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005512573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524143906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005512573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.30</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pereyra, Marcos S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Waterlogging stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drought stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quiescence strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Escape strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dehydration avoidance strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argüello, Juan A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bima, Paula I.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Industrial crops and products</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">161</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300894678</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483245-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259270792</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-633X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.30</subfield><subfield code="j">Natürliche Ressourcen</subfield><subfield code="x">Land- und Forstwirtschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Pereyra, Marcos S. |
spellingShingle |
Pereyra, Marcos S. ddc 630 bkl 48.30 misc Waterlogging stress misc Drought stress misc Quiescence strategy misc Escape strategy misc Dehydration avoidance strategy Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
authorStr |
Pereyra, Marcos S. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)300894678 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1872-633X |
topic_title |
630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes Waterlogging stress Drought stress Quiescence strategy Escape strategy Dehydration avoidance strategy |
topic |
ddc 630 bkl 48.30 misc Waterlogging stress misc Drought stress misc Quiescence strategy misc Escape strategy misc Dehydration avoidance strategy |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 bkl 48.30 misc Waterlogging stress misc Drought stress misc Quiescence strategy misc Escape strategy misc Dehydration avoidance strategy |
topic_browse |
ddc 630 bkl 48.30 misc Waterlogging stress misc Drought stress misc Quiescence strategy misc Escape strategy misc Dehydration avoidance strategy |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Industrial crops and products |
hierarchy_parent_id |
300894678 |
dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management |
hierarchy_top_title |
Industrial crops and products |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)300894678 (DE-600)1483245-8 (DE-576)259270792 |
title |
Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV005512573 (ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7 |
title_full |
Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
author_sort |
Pereyra, Marcos S. |
journal |
Industrial crops and products |
journalStr |
Industrial crops and products |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2020 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Pereyra, Marcos S. Argüello, Juan A. Bima, Paula I. |
container_volume |
161 |
class |
630 640 DE-600 48.30 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Pereyra, Marcos S. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 |
dewey-full |
630 640 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
title_auth |
Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
abstract |
Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. |
abstractGer |
Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Argüello, Juan A. Bima, Paula I. |
author2Str |
Argüello, Juan A. Bima, Paula I. |
ppnlink |
300894678 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:13:19.535Z |
_version_ |
1803854387125157888 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005512573</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524143906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113206</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005512573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0926-6690(20)31123-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48.30</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pereyra, Marcos S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genotype-dependent architectural and physiological responses regulate the strategies of two oregano cultivars to water excess and deficiency regimes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plants can exhibit alternative strategies to cope with water stress regimes by reconfiguring different morphophysiological processes. Nonetheless, the physiological bases that define the response of oregano genotypes to water stress are still poorly understood. A pot experiment in a greenhouse was conducted to evaluate the changes in the configuration of plant architecture and physiological traits and the strategies displayed by two novel oregano cultivars (Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum ‘Alpa Sumaj FCA-INTA’ and Origanum x majoricum Cambess. ‘Aguanda FCA-INTA’) in response to two water stress regimes (water excess and deficit) in vegetative phenological stages. To do this, water relations and morphological, developmental, and physiological traits were measured. The architectural and physiological responses were dependent upon stressful water regimes and oregano cultivars. Two strategies were found to face water excess regime: Alpa Sumaj remained quiescent whereas Aguanda followed an escape strategy. Biomass production of Alpa Sumaj was halved since physiological and architectural traits were mostly reduced, especially the leaf area. In contrast, Aguanda was more tolerant because of its altered biomass allocation pattern, leading to taller plants with mild reductions of the leaf area and transpiration rate. Therefore, relative water content and biomass yield were preserved. Contrastingly, the strategy to face water deficit regime in both cultivars was dehydration avoidance. All traits were reduced in a similar way, but interesting genotypic differences in water relation traits were observed. Thereby, leaf water potential decrease was highlighted in Alpa Sumaj cultivar, whereas the lessening in transpiration rate as the leaf area is reduced represented the outstanding physiological trait of Aguanda.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Waterlogging stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drought stress</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quiescence strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Escape strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dehydration avoidance strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Argüello, Juan A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bima, Paula I.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Industrial crops and products</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1992</subfield><subfield code="g">161</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300894678</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483245-8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)259270792</subfield><subfield code="x">1872-633X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">48.30</subfield><subfield code="j">Natürliche Ressourcen</subfield><subfield code="x">Land- und Forstwirtschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">161</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4022713 |