Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al
Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet therma...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Pandey, Shivam [verfasserIn] Bansal, Anuj [verfasserIn] Omer, Ankita [verfasserIn] Singla, Anil Kumar [verfasserIn] Goyal, Deepak Kumar [verfasserIn] Singh, Jagtar [verfasserIn] Gupta, Munish Kumar [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Surface and coatings technology - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986, 410 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:410 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV005705339 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV005705339 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230927074712.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230504s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV005705339 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |a 670 |q VZ |
084 | |a 52.78 |2 bkl | ||
084 | |a 51.20 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pandey, Shivam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cavitation erosion | |
650 | 4 | |a Rodojet thermal spray process | |
650 | 4 | |a AISI410 steel | |
650 | 4 | |a Coating process parameters | |
700 | 1 | |a Bansal, Anuj |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Omer, Ankita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Singla, Anil Kumar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Goyal, Deepak Kumar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Singh, Jagtar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gupta, Munish Kumar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surface and coatings technology |d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 |g 410 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)308447522 |w (DE-600)1502240-7 |w (DE-576)098474049 |x 0257-8972 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:410 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 52.78 |j Oberflächentechnik |j Wärmebehandlung |q VZ |
936 | b | k | |a 51.20 |j Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 410 |
author_variant |
s p sp a b ab a o ao a k s ak aks d k g dk dkg j s js m k g mk mkg |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:02578972:2021----::fetfulrsueedaensryitnenaiainrs |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
bklnumber |
52.78 51.20 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 doi (DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Pandey, Shivam verfasserin aut Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters Bansal, Anuj verfasserin aut Omer, Ankita verfasserin aut Singla, Anil Kumar verfasserin aut Goyal, Deepak Kumar verfasserin aut Singh, Jagtar verfasserin aut Gupta, Munish Kumar verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 410 Online-Ressource (DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 0257-8972 nnns volume:410 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 52.78 Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung VZ 51.20 Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften VZ AR 410 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 doi (DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Pandey, Shivam verfasserin aut Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters Bansal, Anuj verfasserin aut Omer, Ankita verfasserin aut Singla, Anil Kumar verfasserin aut Goyal, Deepak Kumar verfasserin aut Singh, Jagtar verfasserin aut Gupta, Munish Kumar verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 410 Online-Ressource (DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 0257-8972 nnns volume:410 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 52.78 Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung VZ 51.20 Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften VZ AR 410 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 doi (DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Pandey, Shivam verfasserin aut Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters Bansal, Anuj verfasserin aut Omer, Ankita verfasserin aut Singla, Anil Kumar verfasserin aut Goyal, Deepak Kumar verfasserin aut Singh, Jagtar verfasserin aut Gupta, Munish Kumar verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 410 Online-Ressource (DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 0257-8972 nnns volume:410 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 52.78 Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung VZ 51.20 Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften VZ AR 410 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 doi (DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Pandey, Shivam verfasserin aut Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters Bansal, Anuj verfasserin aut Omer, Ankita verfasserin aut Singla, Anil Kumar verfasserin aut Goyal, Deepak Kumar verfasserin aut Singh, Jagtar verfasserin aut Gupta, Munish Kumar verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 410 Online-Ressource (DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 0257-8972 nnns volume:410 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 52.78 Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung VZ 51.20 Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften VZ AR 410 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 doi (DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Pandey, Shivam verfasserin aut Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters Bansal, Anuj verfasserin aut Omer, Ankita verfasserin aut Singla, Anil Kumar verfasserin aut Goyal, Deepak Kumar verfasserin aut Singh, Jagtar verfasserin aut Gupta, Munish Kumar verfasserin aut Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986 410 Online-Ressource (DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 0257-8972 nnns volume:410 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 52.78 Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung VZ 51.20 Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften VZ AR 410 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology 410 volume:410 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Surface and coatings technology 410 volume:410 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Oberflächentechnik Wärmebehandlung Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters |
dewey-raw |
620 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Surface and coatings technology |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Pandey, Shivam @@aut@@ Bansal, Anuj @@aut@@ Omer, Ankita @@aut@@ Singla, Anil Kumar @@aut@@ Goyal, Deepak Kumar @@aut@@ Singh, Jagtar @@aut@@ Gupta, Munish Kumar @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
308447522 |
dewey-sort |
3620 |
id |
ELV005705339 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005705339</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230927074712.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005705339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.78</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Shivam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cavitation erosion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rodojet thermal spray process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">AISI410 steel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coating process parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bansal, Anuj</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Omer, Ankita</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singla, Anil Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goyal, Deepak Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Jagtar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, Munish Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Surface and coatings technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986</subfield><subfield code="g">410</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)308447522</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1502240-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098474049</subfield><subfield code="x">0257-8972</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.78</subfield><subfield code="j">Oberflächentechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmebehandlung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">410</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Pandey, Shivam |
spellingShingle |
Pandey, Shivam ddc 620 bkl 52.78 bkl 51.20 misc Cavitation erosion misc Rodojet thermal spray process misc AISI410 steel misc Coating process parameters Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
authorStr |
Pandey, Shivam |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)308447522 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
620 - Engineering & allied operations 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0257-8972 |
topic_title |
620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al Cavitation erosion Rodojet thermal spray process AISI410 steel Coating process parameters |
topic |
ddc 620 bkl 52.78 bkl 51.20 misc Cavitation erosion misc Rodojet thermal spray process misc AISI410 steel misc Coating process parameters |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 620 bkl 52.78 bkl 51.20 misc Cavitation erosion misc Rodojet thermal spray process misc AISI410 steel misc Coating process parameters |
topic_browse |
ddc 620 bkl 52.78 bkl 51.20 misc Cavitation erosion misc Rodojet thermal spray process misc AISI410 steel misc Coating process parameters |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Surface and coatings technology |
hierarchy_parent_id |
308447522 |
dewey-tens |
620 - Engineering 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Surface and coatings technology |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)308447522 (DE-600)1502240-7 (DE-576)098474049 |
title |
Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV005705339 (ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1 |
title_full |
Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
author_sort |
Pandey, Shivam |
journal |
Surface and coatings technology |
journalStr |
Surface and coatings technology |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Pandey, Shivam Bansal, Anuj Omer, Ankita Singla, Anil Kumar Goyal, Deepak Kumar Singh, Jagtar Gupta, Munish Kumar |
container_volume |
410 |
class |
620 670 VZ 52.78 bkl 51.20 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Pandey, Shivam |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 |
dewey-full |
620 670 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of rodojet sprayed al |
title_auth |
Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
abstract |
Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. |
abstractGer |
Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Bansal, Anuj Omer, Ankita Singla, Anil Kumar Goyal, Deepak Kumar Singh, Jagtar Gupta, Munish Kumar |
author2Str |
Bansal, Anuj Omer, Ankita Singla, Anil Kumar Goyal, Deepak Kumar Singh, Jagtar Gupta, Munish Kumar |
ppnlink |
308447522 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:52:48.338Z |
_version_ |
1803856870995132416 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV005705339</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230927074712.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230504s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126961</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV005705339</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0257-8972(21)00134-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.78</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pandey, Shivam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance on cavitation erosion of Rodojet sprayed Al</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cavitation erosion is one of the major concerns of wear in hydro-machinery. The ensuing damage can be mitigated by using protective coatings, prepared with ceramic materials like Al2O3 and TiO2. Hence, in this research work, Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings developed using automated and cheaper Rodojet thermal spray process on hydro-machinery AISI410 steel have been explored with regard to cavitation erosion (CE). Coatings with variation in process parameters namely fuel pressure, feed rate, and spray distance have been prepared to analyze their effect on CE and mechanical properties. An indigenously fabricated high velocity water jet cavitation erosion test rig was used for CE analysis. CE of bare AISI410 steel was also analyzed with variation in erosion parameters namely velocity and stand-off distance. The results indicate that CE of AISI410 steel was observed to be maximum for maximum velocity of 35 m/s and intermediate stand-off distance as 10 cm, owing to the maximum bubble density with higher velocity and bursting of majority of bubbles near to the target surface due to intermediate stand-off distance. Further, CE of Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings were found to be lower as compared to AIS410 steel. Coating parameters with minimum pressure of O2 and acetylene as 1.25 and 2 bar, respectively, minimum feed rate as 740 cm/min, and maximum spray distance as 23 cm were found to be optimum for maximum CE resistance, owing to the higher resistance provided to the cavitation shock wave, by the spongy, porous and thick coating with lower microhardness and fracture toughness values. Roughening of splat surface, single and overlapped CE pits were observed to be the possible mechanism behind the erosion of the Rodojet sprayed Al2O3+50%TiO2 coatings.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cavitation erosion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rodojet thermal spray process</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">AISI410 steel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coating process parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bansal, Anuj</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Omer, Ankita</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singla, Anil Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goyal, Deepak Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Singh, Jagtar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gupta, Munish Kumar</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Surface and coatings technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1986</subfield><subfield code="g">410</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)308447522</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1502240-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)098474049</subfield><subfield code="x">0257-8972</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:410</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.78</subfield><subfield code="j">Oberflächentechnik</subfield><subfield code="j">Wärmebehandlung</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffoberflächeneigenschaften</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">410</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010277 |