Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure
This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beam...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Wang, Zhuolin [verfasserIn] Dai, Jian-Guo [verfasserIn] Wang, Mingqian [verfasserIn] Chen, Lingzhu [verfasserIn] Zhang, Fuwen [verfasserIn] Xu, Qingfeng [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Fire safety journal - New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977, 124 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:124 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV006270867 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV006270867 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524163629.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV006270867 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 50.17 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wang, Zhuolin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. | ||
650 | 4 | |a CFRP reinforcement | |
650 | 4 | |a Concrete | |
650 | 4 | |a Bond behavior | |
650 | 4 | |a Elevated temperature exposure | |
650 | 4 | |a Cement bonding | |
700 | 1 | |a Dai, Jian-Guo |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Mingqian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Lingzhu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Fuwen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xu, Qingfeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Fire safety journal |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 |g 124 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)300897758 |w (DE-600)1483569-1 |w (DE-576)096188588 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:124 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 50.17 |j Sicherheitstechnik |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 124 |
author_variant |
z w zw j g d jgd m w mw l c lc f z fz q x qx |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
wangzhuolindaijianguowangmingqianchenlin:2021----:eiulodteghoeoyncmnbnecrrifreettcnrtitraeat |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
bklnumber |
50.17 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 doi (DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Wang, Zhuolin verfasserin aut Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding Dai, Jian-Guo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 aut Wang, Mingqian verfasserin aut Chen, Lingzhu verfasserin aut Zhang, Fuwen verfasserin aut Xu, Qingfeng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fire safety journal New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 124 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 nnns volume:124 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 50.17 Sicherheitstechnik AR 124 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 doi (DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Wang, Zhuolin verfasserin aut Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding Dai, Jian-Guo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 aut Wang, Mingqian verfasserin aut Chen, Lingzhu verfasserin aut Zhang, Fuwen verfasserin aut Xu, Qingfeng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fire safety journal New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 124 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 nnns volume:124 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 50.17 Sicherheitstechnik AR 124 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 doi (DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Wang, Zhuolin verfasserin aut Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding Dai, Jian-Guo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 aut Wang, Mingqian verfasserin aut Chen, Lingzhu verfasserin aut Zhang, Fuwen verfasserin aut Xu, Qingfeng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fire safety journal New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 124 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 nnns volume:124 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 50.17 Sicherheitstechnik AR 124 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 doi (DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Wang, Zhuolin verfasserin aut Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding Dai, Jian-Guo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 aut Wang, Mingqian verfasserin aut Chen, Lingzhu verfasserin aut Zhang, Fuwen verfasserin aut Xu, Qingfeng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fire safety journal New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 124 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 nnns volume:124 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 50.17 Sicherheitstechnik AR 124 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 doi (DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Wang, Zhuolin verfasserin aut Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding Dai, Jian-Guo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 aut Wang, Mingqian verfasserin aut Chen, Lingzhu verfasserin aut Zhang, Fuwen verfasserin aut Xu, Qingfeng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fire safety journal New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977 124 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 nnns volume:124 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 50.17 Sicherheitstechnik AR 124 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Fire safety journal 124 volume:124 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Fire safety journal 124 volume:124 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Sicherheitstechnik |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding |
dewey-raw |
690 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Fire safety journal |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Zhuolin @@aut@@ Dai, Jian-Guo @@aut@@ Wang, Mingqian @@aut@@ Chen, Lingzhu @@aut@@ Zhang, Fuwen @@aut@@ Xu, Qingfeng @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
300897758 |
dewey-sort |
3690 |
id |
ELV006270867 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006270867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524163629.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006270867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.17</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Zhuolin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Concrete</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bond behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elevated temperature exposure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cement bonding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dai, Jian-Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Mingqian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Lingzhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Fuwen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Qingfeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Fire safety journal</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">124</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300897758</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483569-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)096188588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.17</subfield><subfield code="j">Sicherheitstechnik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Wang, Zhuolin |
spellingShingle |
Wang, Zhuolin ddc 690 bkl 50.17 misc CFRP reinforcement misc Concrete misc Bond behavior misc Elevated temperature exposure misc Cement bonding Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
authorStr |
Wang, Zhuolin |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)300897758 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
690 DE-600 50.17 bkl Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure CFRP reinforcement Concrete Bond behavior Elevated temperature exposure Cement bonding |
topic |
ddc 690 bkl 50.17 misc CFRP reinforcement misc Concrete misc Bond behavior misc Elevated temperature exposure misc Cement bonding |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 50.17 misc CFRP reinforcement misc Concrete misc Bond behavior misc Elevated temperature exposure misc Cement bonding |
topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 50.17 misc CFRP reinforcement misc Concrete misc Bond behavior misc Elevated temperature exposure misc Cement bonding |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Fire safety journal |
hierarchy_parent_id |
300897758 |
dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
hierarchy_top_title |
Fire safety journal |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)300897758 (DE-600)1483569-1 (DE-576)096188588 |
title |
Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV006270867 (ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X |
title_full |
Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
author_sort |
Wang, Zhuolin |
journal |
Fire safety journal |
journalStr |
Fire safety journal |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Wang, Zhuolin Dai, Jian-Guo Wang, Mingqian Chen, Lingzhu Zhang, Fuwen Xu, Qingfeng |
container_volume |
124 |
class |
690 DE-600 50.17 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Wang, Zhuolin |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-9904-7914 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914 |
dewey-full |
690 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded cfrp reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
title_auth |
Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
abstract |
This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. |
abstractGer |
This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. |
abstract_unstemmed |
This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Dai, Jian-Guo Wang, Mingqian Chen, Lingzhu Zhang, Fuwen Xu, Qingfeng |
author2Str |
Dai, Jian-Guo Wang, Mingqian Chen, Lingzhu Zhang, Fuwen Xu, Qingfeng |
ppnlink |
300897758 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T20:48:33.169Z |
_version_ |
1803864153176145920 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006270867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524163629.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103393</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006270867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0379-7112(21)00134-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">50.17</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Zhuolin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Residual bond strengths of epoxy and cement-bonded CFRP reinforcements to concrete interfaces after elevated temperature exposure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper presents the results from a comparative study on the residual bond performance of epoxy and cement-bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcement to concrete interfaces that experienced different levels of elevated temperature exposure. In total twelve groups of concrete beams strengthened with CFRP sheet and grids of the same tensile stiffness, through epoxy and cement-based adhesive bonding, respectively, were carefully prepared and exposed to different test temperature levels from 20 °C to 600 °C. Both polymer cement mortar (PCM) and ductile engineered cementitious composite (ECC) were adopted as the cement binder. The strengthened beams were tested under three-point monotonic bending after different levels of elevated temperature exposure. It was found that with increasing the exposure temperature, the failure modes of the strengthened beams shifted from debonding in a thin layer of concrete substrate to debonding near the fiber-adhesive interface and tearing off of CFRP grids from the ECC matrix. The peak loads of concrete beams strengthened with cement-bonded CFRP grids are at least 50% higher than their counterparts strengthened with epoxy-bonded CFRP sheets given the same temperature exposure.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFRP reinforcement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Concrete</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bond behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Elevated temperature exposure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cement bonding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dai, Jian-Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-9904-7914</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Mingqian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chen, Lingzhu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang, Fuwen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xu, Qingfeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Fire safety journal</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1977</subfield><subfield code="g">124</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300897758</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483569-1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)096188588</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">50.17</subfield><subfield code="j">Sicherheitstechnik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">124</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4012003 |