Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method
With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This stud...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Zuo, Zhuo [verfasserIn] Xiao, YuLong [verfasserIn] Liu, ZhenFeng [verfasserIn] Liu, BingQi [verfasserIn] Yan, YuCheng [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A - Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984, 1010 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1010 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV006279767 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV006279767 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230524125856.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV006279767 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 084 | |a 33.05 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 33.07 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 33.40 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Zuo, Zhuo |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Neutron detection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neutron and gamma discrimination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Filtering | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Percentage slope method | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Angle difference method | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xiao, YuLong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, ZhenFeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Liu, BingQi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yan, YuCheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |d Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 |g 1010 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)266014666 |w (DE-600)1466532-3 |w (DE-576)074959743 |x 0168-9002 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1010 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 33.05 |j Experimentalphysik |
| 936 | b | k | |a 33.07 |j Spektroskopie |
| 936 | b | k | |a 33.40 |j Kernphysik |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1010 | ||
| author_variant |
z z zz y x yx z l zl b l bl y y yy |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:01689002:2021----::iciiainfetosngmaasnlsisitlaobsdnalne |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| bklnumber |
33.05 33.07 33.40 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 doi (DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Zuo, Zhuo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X aut Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method Xiao, YuLong verfasserin aut Liu, ZhenFeng verfasserin aut Liu, BingQi verfasserin aut Yan, YuCheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 1010 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 0168-9002 nnns volume:1010 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.05 Experimentalphysik 33.07 Spektroskopie 33.40 Kernphysik AR 1010 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 doi (DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Zuo, Zhuo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X aut Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method Xiao, YuLong verfasserin aut Liu, ZhenFeng verfasserin aut Liu, BingQi verfasserin aut Yan, YuCheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 1010 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 0168-9002 nnns volume:1010 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.05 Experimentalphysik 33.07 Spektroskopie 33.40 Kernphysik AR 1010 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 doi (DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Zuo, Zhuo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X aut Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method Xiao, YuLong verfasserin aut Liu, ZhenFeng verfasserin aut Liu, BingQi verfasserin aut Yan, YuCheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 1010 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 0168-9002 nnns volume:1010 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.05 Experimentalphysik 33.07 Spektroskopie 33.40 Kernphysik AR 1010 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 doi (DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Zuo, Zhuo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X aut Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method Xiao, YuLong verfasserin aut Liu, ZhenFeng verfasserin aut Liu, BingQi verfasserin aut Yan, YuCheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 1010 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 0168-9002 nnns volume:1010 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.05 Experimentalphysik 33.07 Spektroskopie 33.40 Kernphysik AR 1010 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 doi (DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Zuo, Zhuo verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X aut Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method Xiao, YuLong verfasserin aut Liu, ZhenFeng verfasserin aut Liu, BingQi verfasserin aut Yan, YuCheng verfasserin aut Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984 1010 Online-Ressource (DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 0168-9002 nnns volume:1010 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.05 Experimentalphysik 33.07 Spektroskopie 33.40 Kernphysik AR 1010 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A 1010 volume:1010 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A 1010 volume:1010 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Experimentalphysik Spektroskopie Kernphysik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Zuo, Zhuo @@aut@@ Xiao, YuLong @@aut@@ Liu, ZhenFeng @@aut@@ Liu, BingQi @@aut@@ Yan, YuCheng @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
266014666 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
ELV006279767 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006279767</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524125856.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006279767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.05</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zuo, Zhuo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutron detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutron and gamma discrimination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filtering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percentage slope method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Angle difference method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, YuLong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, ZhenFeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, BingQi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan, YuCheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">1010</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266014666</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466532-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)074959743</subfield><subfield code="x">0168-9002</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.05</subfield><subfield code="j">Experimentalphysik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.07</subfield><subfield code="j">Spektroskopie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Kernphysik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1010</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Zuo, Zhuo |
| spellingShingle |
Zuo, Zhuo ddc 530 bkl 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 misc Neutron detection misc Neutron and gamma discrimination misc Filtering misc Percentage slope method misc Angle difference method Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| authorStr |
Zuo, Zhuo |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)266014666 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0168-9002 |
| topic_title |
530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method Neutron detection Neutron and gamma discrimination Filtering Percentage slope method Angle difference method |
| topic |
ddc 530 bkl 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 misc Neutron detection misc Neutron and gamma discrimination misc Filtering misc Percentage slope method misc Angle difference method |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 bkl 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 misc Neutron detection misc Neutron and gamma discrimination misc Filtering misc Percentage slope method misc Angle difference method |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 bkl 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 misc Neutron detection misc Neutron and gamma discrimination misc Filtering misc Percentage slope method misc Angle difference method |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
266014666 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)266014666 (DE-600)1466532-3 (DE-576)074959743 |
| title |
Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV006279767 (ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X |
| title_full |
Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| author_sort |
Zuo, Zhuo |
| journal |
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |
| journalStr |
Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| author_browse |
Zuo, Zhuo Xiao, YuLong Liu, ZhenFeng Liu, BingQi Yan, YuCheng |
| container_volume |
1010 |
| class |
530 DE-600 33.05 bkl 33.07 bkl 33.40 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Zuo, Zhuo |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-2341-177X |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X |
| dewey-full |
530 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| title_auth |
Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| abstract |
With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. |
| abstractGer |
With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
| title_short |
Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Xiao, YuLong Liu, ZhenFeng Liu, BingQi Yan, YuCheng |
| author2Str |
Xiao, YuLong Liu, ZhenFeng Liu, BingQi Yan, YuCheng |
| ppnlink |
266014666 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:50:21.453Z |
| _version_ |
1803864266720149504 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006279767</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524125856.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nima.2021.165483</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006279767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0168-9002(21)00468-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.05</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.07</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.40</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zuo, Zhuo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2341-177X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Discrimination of neutrons and gamma-rays in plastic scintillator based on falling-edge percentage slope method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With the development of neutron detection technology, the demand for real-time and fast neutron gamma discrimination has become of increasing importance. In this study, neutron and gamma pulse signals measured by an EJ299-33A plastic scintillator detector were analyzed via Matlab off-line. This study compares the effects of seven fast neutron and gamma (n/ γ ) discrimination methods; (i) charge comparison method, (ii) time-domain oriented method, (iii) amplitude oriented method, (iv) pulse time–amplitude two types of width method, (v) angle difference method, (vi) falling-edge numerical integral method, and, lastly, (vii) falling-edge percentage slope method proposed in this study. We verified that filtering and amplitude normalization improve the discrimination quality but consume much time that accounts for 99.6 % of the total discrimination time. The proposed method was compared with other six methods in two aspects: (i) the figure of merit ( F o M ), (ii) the discrimination time. The F o M value and time consumption of the falling-edge percentage slope method with amplitude normalization are 1.26 and 0.0621s, respectively, while an unnormalized F o M value is 1.02. Experimental results showed that compared with all aforementioned methods, the F O M value of our proposed method is the second high followed the charge comparison method, retaining a short discrimination time which is only half of that of the charge comparison method. This relatively short time consuming is on account of its low volume of data storage and calculation. Generally, the falling-edge percentage slope method has a good discrimination performance while consumes little time, which is capable to be implemented on real-time discrimination applications.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutron detection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neutron and gamma discrimination</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Filtering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percentage slope method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Angle difference method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao, YuLong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, ZhenFeng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liu, BingQi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yan, YuCheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research / A</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : North-Holland Publ. Co., 1984</subfield><subfield code="g">1010</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)266014666</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1466532-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)074959743</subfield><subfield code="x">0168-9002</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.05</subfield><subfield code="j">Experimentalphysik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.07</subfield><subfield code="j">Spektroskopie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.40</subfield><subfield code="j">Kernphysik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1010</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.400218 |