Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum
Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Wang, Chaojun [verfasserIn] Modest, Michael F. [verfasserIn] Ren, Tao [verfasserIn] Cai, Jian [verfasserIn] He, Boshu [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer - New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961, 271 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:271 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV006334296 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV006334296 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524155826.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV006334296 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 33.00 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wang, Chaojun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Radiative heat transfer | |
650 | 4 | |a global spectral method | |
650 | 4 | |a FSCK method | |
650 | 4 | |a SLW method | |
650 | 4 | |a nonhomogeneous media | |
650 | 4 | |a correlated assumption | |
650 | 4 | |a scaled assumption | |
700 | 1 | |a Modest, Michael F. |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ren, Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cai, Jian |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a He, Boshu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 |g 271 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)302718931 |w (DE-600)1491916-3 |w (DE-576)255266650 |x 1879-1352 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:271 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 33.00 |j Physik: Allgemeines |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 271 |
author_variant |
c w cw m f m mf mfm t r tr j c jc b h bh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18791352:2021----::oprsnnrfnmnoteai |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
bklnumber |
33.00 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 doi (DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Wang, Chaojun verfasserin aut Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption Modest, Michael F. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 aut Ren, Tao verfasserin aut Cai, Jian verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 aut He, Boshu verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 271 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 1879-1352 nnns volume:271 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.00 Physik: Allgemeines AR 271 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 doi (DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Wang, Chaojun verfasserin aut Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption Modest, Michael F. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 aut Ren, Tao verfasserin aut Cai, Jian verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 aut He, Boshu verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 271 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 1879-1352 nnns volume:271 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.00 Physik: Allgemeines AR 271 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 doi (DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Wang, Chaojun verfasserin aut Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption Modest, Michael F. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 aut Ren, Tao verfasserin aut Cai, Jian verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 aut He, Boshu verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 271 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 1879-1352 nnns volume:271 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.00 Physik: Allgemeines AR 271 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 doi (DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Wang, Chaojun verfasserin aut Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption Modest, Michael F. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 aut Ren, Tao verfasserin aut Cai, Jian verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 aut He, Boshu verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 271 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 1879-1352 nnns volume:271 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.00 Physik: Allgemeines AR 271 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 doi (DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Wang, Chaojun verfasserin aut Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption Modest, Michael F. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 aut Ren, Tao verfasserin aut Cai, Jian verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 aut He, Boshu verfasserin aut Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961 271 Online-Ressource (DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 1879-1352 nnns volume:271 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 33.00 Physik: Allgemeines AR 271 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer 271 volume:271 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer 271 volume:271 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Physik: Allgemeines |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Chaojun @@aut@@ Modest, Michael F. @@aut@@ Ren, Tao @@aut@@ Cai, Jian @@aut@@ He, Boshu @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
302718931 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
ELV006334296 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006334296</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524155826.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006334296</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaojun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radiative heat transfer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">global spectral method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">FSCK method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SLW method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nonhomogeneous media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">correlated assumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scaled assumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Modest, Michael F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Tao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai, Jian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Boshu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">271</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)302718931</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1491916-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)255266650</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-1352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Physik: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">271</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Wang, Chaojun |
spellingShingle |
Wang, Chaojun ddc 530 bkl 33.00 misc Radiative heat transfer misc global spectral method misc FSCK method misc SLW method misc nonhomogeneous media misc correlated assumption misc scaled assumption Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
authorStr |
Wang, Chaojun |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)302718931 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1879-1352 |
topic_title |
530 DE-600 33.00 bkl Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum Radiative heat transfer global spectral method FSCK method SLW method nonhomogeneous media correlated assumption scaled assumption |
topic |
ddc 530 bkl 33.00 misc Radiative heat transfer misc global spectral method misc FSCK method misc SLW method misc nonhomogeneous media misc correlated assumption misc scaled assumption |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 bkl 33.00 misc Radiative heat transfer misc global spectral method misc FSCK method misc SLW method misc nonhomogeneous media misc correlated assumption misc scaled assumption |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 bkl 33.00 misc Radiative heat transfer misc global spectral method misc FSCK method misc SLW method misc nonhomogeneous media misc correlated assumption misc scaled assumption |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |
hierarchy_parent_id |
302718931 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)302718931 (DE-600)1491916-3 (DE-576)255266650 |
title |
Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV006334296 (ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6 |
title_full |
Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
author_sort |
Wang, Chaojun |
journal |
Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |
journalStr |
Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Wang, Chaojun Modest, Michael F. Ren, Tao Cai, Jian He, Boshu |
container_volume |
271 |
class |
530 DE-600 33.00 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Wang, Chaojun |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 |
normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0001-6034-7602 (ORCID)0000-0002-8178-6302 |
normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602 (orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302 |
dewey-full |
530 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
title_auth |
Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
abstract |
Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. |
abstractGer |
Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Modest, Michael F. Ren, Tao Cai, Jian He, Boshu |
author2Str |
Modest, Michael F. Ren, Tao Cai, Jian He, Boshu |
ppnlink |
302718931 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T21:01:36.539Z |
_version_ |
1803864974600175616 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006334296</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524155826.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107695</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006334296</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0022-4073(21)00188-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">33.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Chaojun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison and refinement of the various full-spectrum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Both the full-spectrum k-distribution (FSK) method and the spectral line weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) method are global spectral methods, with the former based on a spectral reordering concept, while the latter uses spectral binning. Both can provide excellent accuracy with outstanding numerical efficiency to model radiative heat transfer in combustion gases. In the present paper we aim to complete the development of both methods, and to tie them together, pointing out their commonalities and differences of their nonhomogeneous media extensions, employing either the correlated or scaled absorption coefficient assumption. Results from the complete set of plausible implementations are discussed and compared in detail for several radiative heat transfer calculations carried out in both 1D slabs and a real combustion field. The results show that emission is an important criterion to examine the accuracy of global methods applied to nonhomogeneous media, i.e., those that preserve emission generally give more accurate results than those that do not. It was also found that, while proper choice of the reference temperature required by all methods is important, the recommended methods appear to be only weakly dependent on that choice. Finally, equivalent SLW schemes are generally somewhat less accurate than their FSK counterparts due to their low-order spectral integration scheme; and this may be exacerbated if full-spectrum k-distributions are determined by mixing of values from individual species, as appears to be the preferred approach by SLW users to date.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Radiative heat transfer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">global spectral method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">FSCK method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SLW method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">nonhomogeneous media</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">correlated assumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scaled assumption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Modest, Michael F.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6034-7602</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ren, Tao</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai, Jian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8178-6302</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He, Boshu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of quantitative spectroscopy & radiative transfer</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1961</subfield><subfield code="g">271</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)302718931</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1491916-3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)255266650</subfield><subfield code="x">1879-1352</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">33.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Physik: Allgemeines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">271</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3991175 |