Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting
Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Choi, Seulggie [verfasserIn] Ghang, Byeongzu [verfasserIn] Jeong, Seogsong [verfasserIn] Choi, Daein [verfasserIn] Lee, Jeong Seok [verfasserIn] Park, Sang Min [verfasserIn] Lee, Eun Young [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism - Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971, 51, Seite 685-691 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:51 ; pages:685-691 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV006478883 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV006478883 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230524132348.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV006478883 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
084 | |a 44.83 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Choi, Seulggie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs | |
650 | 4 | |a Drug survival | |
650 | 4 | |a Rheumatoid arthritis | |
700 | 1 | |a Ghang, Byeongzu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jeong, Seogsong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Choi, Daein |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Jeong Seok |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Park, Sang Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Eun Young |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |d Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 |g 51, Seite 685-691 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)330079441 |w (DE-600)2048942-0 |w (DE-576)097935018 |x 1532-866X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g pages:685-691 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 44.83 |j Rheumatologie |j Orthopädie |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 51 |h 685-691 |
author_variant |
s c sc b g bg s j sj d c dc j s l js jsl s m p sm smp e y l ey eyl |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1532866X:2021----::soitoofrteodntidiedadadsmrwtdusriaaogeooiiehuaodrhii |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
bklnumber |
44.83 |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 doi (DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Choi, Seulggie verfasserin aut Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis Ghang, Byeongzu verfasserin aut Jeong, Seogsong verfasserin aut Choi, Daein verfasserin aut Lee, Jeong Seok verfasserin aut Park, Sang Min verfasserin aut Lee, Eun Young verfasserin aut Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 51, Seite 685-691 Online-Ressource (DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 1532-866X nnns volume:51 pages:685-691 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 44.83 Rheumatologie Orthopädie AR 51 685-691 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 doi (DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Choi, Seulggie verfasserin aut Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis Ghang, Byeongzu verfasserin aut Jeong, Seogsong verfasserin aut Choi, Daein verfasserin aut Lee, Jeong Seok verfasserin aut Park, Sang Min verfasserin aut Lee, Eun Young verfasserin aut Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 51, Seite 685-691 Online-Ressource (DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 1532-866X nnns volume:51 pages:685-691 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 44.83 Rheumatologie Orthopädie AR 51 685-691 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 doi (DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Choi, Seulggie verfasserin aut Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis Ghang, Byeongzu verfasserin aut Jeong, Seogsong verfasserin aut Choi, Daein verfasserin aut Lee, Jeong Seok verfasserin aut Park, Sang Min verfasserin aut Lee, Eun Young verfasserin aut Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 51, Seite 685-691 Online-Ressource (DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 1532-866X nnns volume:51 pages:685-691 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 44.83 Rheumatologie Orthopädie AR 51 685-691 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 doi (DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Choi, Seulggie verfasserin aut Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis Ghang, Byeongzu verfasserin aut Jeong, Seogsong verfasserin aut Choi, Daein verfasserin aut Lee, Jeong Seok verfasserin aut Park, Sang Min verfasserin aut Lee, Eun Young verfasserin aut Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 51, Seite 685-691 Online-Ressource (DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 1532-866X nnns volume:51 pages:685-691 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 44.83 Rheumatologie Orthopädie AR 51 685-691 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 doi (DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Choi, Seulggie verfasserin aut Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis Ghang, Byeongzu verfasserin aut Jeong, Seogsong verfasserin aut Choi, Daein verfasserin aut Lee, Jeong Seok verfasserin aut Park, Sang Min verfasserin aut Lee, Eun Young verfasserin aut Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971 51, Seite 685-691 Online-Ressource (DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 1532-866X nnns volume:51 pages:685-691 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 44.83 Rheumatologie Orthopädie AR 51 685-691 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 51, Seite 685-691 volume:51 pages:685-691 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 51, Seite 685-691 volume:51 pages:685-691 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Rheumatologie Orthopädie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis |
dewey-raw |
610 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Choi, Seulggie @@aut@@ Ghang, Byeongzu @@aut@@ Jeong, Seogsong @@aut@@ Choi, Daein @@aut@@ Lee, Jeong Seok @@aut@@ Park, Sang Min @@aut@@ Lee, Eun Young @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
330079441 |
dewey-sort |
3610 |
id |
ELV006478883 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006478883</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524132348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006478883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Seulggie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drug survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghang, Byeongzu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong, Seogsong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Daein</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jeong Seok</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Park, Sang Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Eun Young</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">51, Seite 685-691</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)330079441</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048942-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)097935018</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-866X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:685-691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.83</subfield><subfield code="j">Rheumatologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Orthopädie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="h">685-691</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Choi, Seulggie |
spellingShingle |
Choi, Seulggie ddc 610 bkl 44.83 misc Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs misc Drug survival misc Rheumatoid arthritis Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
authorStr |
Choi, Seulggie |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)330079441 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1532-866X |
topic_title |
610 DE-600 44.83 bkl Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs Drug survival Rheumatoid arthritis |
topic |
ddc 610 bkl 44.83 misc Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs misc Drug survival misc Rheumatoid arthritis |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 bkl 44.83 misc Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs misc Drug survival misc Rheumatoid arthritis |
topic_browse |
ddc 610 bkl 44.83 misc Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs misc Drug survival misc Rheumatoid arthritis |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |
hierarchy_parent_id |
330079441 |
dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)330079441 (DE-600)2048942-0 (DE-576)097935018 |
title |
Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV006478883 (ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8 |
title_full |
Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
author_sort |
Choi, Seulggie |
journal |
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |
journalStr |
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
685 |
author_browse |
Choi, Seulggie Ghang, Byeongzu Jeong, Seogsong Choi, Daein Lee, Jeong Seok Park, Sang Min Lee, Eun Young |
container_volume |
51 |
class |
610 DE-600 44.83 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Choi, Seulggie |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 |
dewey-full |
610 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
association of first, second, and third-line bdmards and tsdmard with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: cohort study in a real world setting |
title_auth |
Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
abstract |
Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. |
abstractGer |
Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 |
title_short |
Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Ghang, Byeongzu Jeong, Seogsong Choi, Daein Lee, Jeong Seok Park, Sang Min Lee, Eun Young |
author2Str |
Ghang, Byeongzu Jeong, Seogsong Choi, Daein Lee, Jeong Seok Park, Sang Min Lee, Eun Young |
ppnlink |
330079441 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T21:30:59.925Z |
_version_ |
1803866823643365376 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006478883</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524132348.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006478883</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0049-0172(21)00112-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.83</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Seulggie</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.Results: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69–0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25–0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15–0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16–0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19–0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.Conclusion: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drug survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rheumatoid arthritis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ghang, Byeongzu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jeong, Seogsong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Daein</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Jeong Seok</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Park, Sang Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lee, Eun Young</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</subfield><subfield code="d">Philadelphia, Pa. : Saunders, 1971</subfield><subfield code="g">51, Seite 685-691</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)330079441</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2048942-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)097935018</subfield><subfield code="x">1532-866X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:51</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:685-691</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.83</subfield><subfield code="j">Rheumatologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Orthopädie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">51</subfield><subfield code="h">685-691</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4010477 |