A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle

The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numeri...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Tas-Koehler, Sibel [verfasserIn] Liao, Yixiang [verfasserIn] Hampel, Uwe [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Chemical engineering science - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951, 246
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:246

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007

Katalog-ID:	ELV006666469

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV006666469
003	DE-627
005	20230524135905.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230505s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV006666469
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 660 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 58.14 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Tas-Koehler, Sibel \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.
650		4	\|a CFD
650		4	\|a Bubbly flow
650		4	\|a Drag force coefficient
650		4	\|a Turbulence
650		4	\|a Vortex
650		4	\|a Hybrid drag model
700	1		\|a Liao, Yixiang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Hampel, Uwe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Chemical engineering science \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 \|g 246 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)306717794 \|w (DE-600)1501538-5 \|w (DE-576)094503982 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:246
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 58.14 \|j Chemische Reaktionstechnik
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 246

Indexfelder

author_variant	s t k stk y l yl u h uh
matchkey_str	taskoehlersibelliaoyixianghampeluwe:2021----:ciiaaayiodafreoelnfriprealqifo
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
bklnumber	58.14
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 doi (DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 DE-600 58.14 bkl Tas-Koehler, Sibel verfasserin aut A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model Liao, Yixiang verfasserin aut Hampel, Uwe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical engineering science Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 246 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982 nnns volume:246 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.14 Chemische Reaktionstechnik AR 246
spelling	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 doi (DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 DE-600 58.14 bkl Tas-Koehler, Sibel verfasserin aut A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model Liao, Yixiang verfasserin aut Hampel, Uwe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical engineering science Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 246 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982 nnns volume:246 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.14 Chemische Reaktionstechnik AR 246
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 doi (DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 DE-600 58.14 bkl Tas-Koehler, Sibel verfasserin aut A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model Liao, Yixiang verfasserin aut Hampel, Uwe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical engineering science Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 246 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982 nnns volume:246 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.14 Chemische Reaktionstechnik AR 246
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 doi (DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 DE-600 58.14 bkl Tas-Koehler, Sibel verfasserin aut A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model Liao, Yixiang verfasserin aut Hampel, Uwe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical engineering science Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 246 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982 nnns volume:246 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.14 Chemische Reaktionstechnik AR 246
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 doi (DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 DE-600 58.14 bkl Tas-Koehler, Sibel verfasserin aut A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model Liao, Yixiang verfasserin aut Hampel, Uwe verfasserin aut Enthalten in Chemical engineering science Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951 246 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982 nnns volume:246 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 58.14 Chemische Reaktionstechnik AR 246
language	English
source	Enthalten in Chemical engineering science 246 volume:246
sourceStr	Enthalten in Chemical engineering science 246 volume:246
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Chemische Reaktionstechnik
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model
dewey-raw	660
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Chemical engineering science
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Tas-Koehler, Sibel @@aut@@ Liao, Yixiang @@aut@@ Hampel, Uwe @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	306717794
dewey-sort	3660
id	ELV006666469
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006666469</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524135905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006666469</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.14</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tas-Koehler, Sibel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bubbly flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drag force coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Turbulence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vortex</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hybrid drag model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liao, Yixiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hampel, Uwe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chemical engineering science</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951</subfield><subfield code="g">246</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306717794</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1501538-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094503982</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.14</subfield><subfield code="j">Chemische Reaktionstechnik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">246</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Tas-Koehler, Sibel
spellingShingle	Tas-Koehler, Sibel ddc 660 bkl 58.14 misc CFD misc Bubbly flow misc Drag force coefficient misc Turbulence misc Vortex misc Hybrid drag model A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
authorStr	Tas-Koehler, Sibel
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)306717794
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	660 - Chemical engineering
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
topic_title	660 DE-600 58.14 bkl A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle CFD Bubbly flow Drag force coefficient Turbulence Vortex Hybrid drag model
topic	ddc 660 bkl 58.14 misc CFD misc Bubbly flow misc Drag force coefficient misc Turbulence misc Vortex misc Hybrid drag model
topic_unstemmed	ddc 660 bkl 58.14 misc CFD misc Bubbly flow misc Drag force coefficient misc Turbulence misc Vortex misc Hybrid drag model
topic_browse	ddc 660 bkl 58.14 misc CFD misc Bubbly flow misc Drag force coefficient misc Turbulence misc Vortex misc Hybrid drag model
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Chemical engineering science
hierarchy_parent_id	306717794
dewey-tens	660 - Chemical engineering
hierarchy_top_title	Chemical engineering science
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)306717794 (DE-600)1501538-5 (DE-576)094503982
title	A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV006666469 (ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8
title_full	A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
author_sort	Tas-Koehler, Sibel
journal	Chemical engineering science
journalStr	Chemical engineering science
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Tas-Koehler, Sibel Liao, Yixiang Hampel, Uwe
container_volume	246
class	660 DE-600 58.14 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Tas-Koehler, Sibel
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007
dewey-full	660
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	a critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
title_auth	A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
abstract	The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.
abstractGer	The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.
abstract_unstemmed	The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4336 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
remote_bool	true
author2	Liao, Yixiang Hampel, Uwe
author2Str	Liao, Yixiang Hampel, Uwe
ppnlink	306717794
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007
up_date	2024-07-06T22:09:17.040Z
_version_	1803869232344072192
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV006666469</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524135905.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230505s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV006666469</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0009-2509(21)00572-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.14</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tas-Koehler, Sibel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CFD</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bubbly flow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Drag force coefficient</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Turbulence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vortex</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hybrid drag model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liao, Yixiang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hampel, Uwe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Chemical engineering science</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1951</subfield><subfield code="g">246</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306717794</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1501538-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094503982</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.14</subfield><subfield code="j">Chemische Reaktionstechnik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">246</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401705

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?