The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union
Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
van Dijk, Niels [verfasserIn] Casiraghi, Simone [verfasserIn] Gutwirth, Serge [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: No title available - 43 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:43 |
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV007119992 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV007119992 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230510084002.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230506s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV007119992 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a van Dijk, Niels |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a General Data Protection Regulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Innovation governance | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Artificial Intelligence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a European Commission | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Boundary work | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ecology of practices | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Casiraghi, Simone |e verfasserin |0 (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gutwirth, Serge |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t No title available |g 43 |w (DE-627)320571572 |x 0267-3649 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:43 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_647 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2026 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 43 | ||
| author_variant |
d n v dn dnv s c sc s g sg |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:02673649:2021----::hehfctooitoenneriiilnelgnendtpo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 doi (DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng van Dijk, Niels verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 aut The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices Casiraghi, Simone verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 aut Gutwirth, Serge verfasserin aut Enthalten in No title available 43 (DE-627)320571572 0267-3649 nnns volume:43 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 AR 43 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 doi (DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng van Dijk, Niels verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 aut The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices Casiraghi, Simone verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 aut Gutwirth, Serge verfasserin aut Enthalten in No title available 43 (DE-627)320571572 0267-3649 nnns volume:43 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 AR 43 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 doi (DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng van Dijk, Niels verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 aut The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices Casiraghi, Simone verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 aut Gutwirth, Serge verfasserin aut Enthalten in No title available 43 (DE-627)320571572 0267-3649 nnns volume:43 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 AR 43 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 doi (DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng van Dijk, Niels verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 aut The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices Casiraghi, Simone verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 aut Gutwirth, Serge verfasserin aut Enthalten in No title available 43 (DE-627)320571572 0267-3649 nnns volume:43 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 AR 43 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 doi (DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng van Dijk, Niels verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 aut The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union 2021 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices Casiraghi, Simone verfasserin (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 aut Gutwirth, Serge verfasserin aut Enthalten in No title available 43 (DE-627)320571572 0267-3649 nnns volume:43 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 AR 43 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in No title available 43 volume:43 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in No title available 43 volume:43 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
No title available |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
van Dijk, Niels @@aut@@ Casiraghi, Simone @@aut@@ Gutwirth, Serge @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
320571572 |
| id |
ELV007119992 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV007119992</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230510084002.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230506s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV007119992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Dijk, Niels</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">General Data Protection Regulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Innovation governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Artificial Intelligence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">European Commission</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Boundary work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecology of practices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Casiraghi, Simone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gutwirth, Serge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">No title available</subfield><subfield code="g">43</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320571572</subfield><subfield code="x">0267-3649</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
van Dijk, Niels |
| spellingShingle |
van Dijk, Niels misc Ethics misc General Data Protection Regulation misc Innovation governance misc Artificial Intelligence misc European Commission misc Boundary work misc Ecology of practices The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| authorStr |
van Dijk, Niels |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320571572 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
0267-3649 |
| topic_title |
The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union Ethics General Data Protection Regulation Innovation governance Artificial Intelligence European Commission Boundary work Ecology of practices |
| topic |
misc Ethics misc General Data Protection Regulation misc Innovation governance misc Artificial Intelligence misc European Commission misc Boundary work misc Ecology of practices |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Ethics misc General Data Protection Regulation misc Innovation governance misc Artificial Intelligence misc European Commission misc Boundary work misc Ecology of practices |
| topic_browse |
misc Ethics misc General Data Protection Regulation misc Innovation governance misc Artificial Intelligence misc European Commission misc Boundary work misc Ecology of practices |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
No title available |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
320571572 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
No title available |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320571572 |
| title |
The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV007119992 (ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4 |
| title_full |
The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| author_sort |
van Dijk, Niels |
| journal |
No title available |
| journalStr |
No title available |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| author_browse |
van Dijk, Niels Casiraghi, Simone Gutwirth, Serge |
| container_volume |
43 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
van Dijk, Niels |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 |
| normlink |
(ORCID)0000-0003-2727-5306 (ORCID)0000-0001-6708-9175 |
| normlink_prefix_str_mv |
(orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306 (orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
the ‘ethification’ of ict governance. artificial intelligence and data protection in the european union |
| title_auth |
The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| abstract |
Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. |
| abstractGer |
Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2037 GBV_ILN_2129 |
| title_short |
The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Casiraghi, Simone Gutwirth, Serge |
| author2Str |
Casiraghi, Simone Gutwirth, Serge |
| ppnlink |
320571572 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T23:40:57.794Z |
| _version_ |
1803875000301649920 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV007119992</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230510084002.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230506s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105597</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV007119992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0267-3649(21)00070-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">van Dijk, Niels</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2727-5306</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The ‘Ethification’ of ICT Governance. Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection in the European Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Several European Commission's initiatives have been resorting to ethics in policy discourses as a way to govern and regulate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The proliferation of invocations of ‘ethics’, especially concerning the recent debate on (the regulation of) Artificial Intelligence (AI), can be referred to as the ‘ethification’ phenomenon. This article aims to elucidate the benefits and drawbacks of the ethification of ICT governance, and its effects on the articulations of law, technology and politics in democratic constitutional states. First, the article will provide a mapping to locate where the ethics work is being produced in the EU. Second, the authors will distinguish different types of ethics based on the mapping. Third, the ethification phenomenon will be analyzed through the concepts of boundary and convergence work, where we will both see that it plays the role of ‘normative glue’ between interests of different practices to reach a common goal, but also tracing or obfuscating boundaries to claim autonomy from the law and exclude forms of non-genuine ethics. Fourth, we inquire into the nature of ethics as a practice and the consequences of ethification for the law.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">General Data Protection Regulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Innovation governance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Artificial Intelligence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">European Commission</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Boundary work</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecology of practices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Casiraghi, Simone</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-6708-9175</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gutwirth, Serge</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">No title available</subfield><subfield code="g">43</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320571572</subfield><subfield code="x">0267-3649</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:43</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">43</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013834 |