Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass

This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	da Silva, Ana Carolina [verfasserIn] de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda [verfasserIn] Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia [verfasserIn] de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe [verfasserIn] Campos, Tiago Bastos [verfasserIn] Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Ceramics international - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995, 48, Seite 19746-19756
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:48 ; pages:19746-19756

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242

Katalog-ID:	ELV007982143

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV007982143
003	DE-627
005	20230524130103.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV007982143
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 670 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 51.60 \|2 bkl
084			\|a 58.45 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a da Silva, Ana Carolina \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.
650		4	\|a Zirconia
650		4	\|a Silver
650		4	\|a Soda-lime glass
650		4	\|a Mechanical properties
700	1		\|a de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Campos, Tiago Bastos \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Ceramics international \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 \|g 48, Seite 19746-19756 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)320584305 \|w (DE-600)2018052-4 \|w (DE-576)25523063X \|x 0272-8842 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:48 \|g pages:19746-19756
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2088
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 51.60 \|j Keramische Werkstoffe \|j Hartstoffe \|x Werkstoffkunde
936	b	k	\|a 58.45 \|j Gesteinshüttenkunde
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 48 \|h 19746-19756

Indexfelder

author_variant	s a c d sac sacd o p r a d opra oprad a l m m alm almm c r f d crf crfd t b c tb tbc d m m r m dmmr dmmrm
matchkey_str	article:02728842:2022----::icnardtoadhraepninoptbltbtennitain
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
bklnumber	51.60 58.45
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 doi (DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl da Silva, Ana Carolina verfasserin aut Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 aut Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia verfasserin aut de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe verfasserin aut Campos, Tiago Bastos verfasserin aut Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ceramics international Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 48, Seite 19746-19756 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X 0272-8842 nnns volume:48 pages:19746-19756 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.60 Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Werkstoffkunde 58.45 Gesteinshüttenkunde AR 48 19746-19756
spelling	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 doi (DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl da Silva, Ana Carolina verfasserin aut Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 aut Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia verfasserin aut de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe verfasserin aut Campos, Tiago Bastos verfasserin aut Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ceramics international Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 48, Seite 19746-19756 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X 0272-8842 nnns volume:48 pages:19746-19756 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.60 Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Werkstoffkunde 58.45 Gesteinshüttenkunde AR 48 19746-19756
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 doi (DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl da Silva, Ana Carolina verfasserin aut Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 aut Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia verfasserin aut de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe verfasserin aut Campos, Tiago Bastos verfasserin aut Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ceramics international Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 48, Seite 19746-19756 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X 0272-8842 nnns volume:48 pages:19746-19756 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.60 Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Werkstoffkunde 58.45 Gesteinshüttenkunde AR 48 19746-19756
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 doi (DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl da Silva, Ana Carolina verfasserin aut Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 aut Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia verfasserin aut de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe verfasserin aut Campos, Tiago Bastos verfasserin aut Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ceramics international Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 48, Seite 19746-19756 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X 0272-8842 nnns volume:48 pages:19746-19756 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.60 Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Werkstoffkunde 58.45 Gesteinshüttenkunde AR 48 19746-19756
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242 doi (DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl da Silva, Ana Carolina verfasserin aut Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it. Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848 aut Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia verfasserin aut de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe verfasserin aut Campos, Tiago Bastos verfasserin aut Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata verfasserin aut Enthalten in Ceramics international Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995 48, Seite 19746-19756 Online-Ressource (DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X 0272-8842 nnns volume:48 pages:19746-19756 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.60 Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Werkstoffkunde 58.45 Gesteinshüttenkunde AR 48 19746-19756
language	English
source	Enthalten in Ceramics international 48, Seite 19746-19756 volume:48 pages:19746-19756
sourceStr	Enthalten in Ceramics international 48, Seite 19746-19756 volume:48 pages:19746-19756
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Keramische Werkstoffe Hartstoffe Gesteinshüttenkunde
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties
dewey-raw	670
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Ceramics international
authorswithroles_txt_mv	da Silva, Ana Carolina @@aut@@ de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda @@aut@@ Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia @@aut@@ de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe @@aut@@ Campos, Tiago Bastos @@aut@@ Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	320584305
dewey-sort	3670
id	ELV007982143
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV007982143</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524130103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV007982143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.60</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.45</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">da Silva, Ana Carolina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zirconia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Silver</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soda-lime glass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mechanical properties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Campos, Tiago Bastos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ceramics international</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">48, Seite 19746-19756</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320584305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2018052-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)25523063X</subfield><subfield code="x">0272-8842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19746-19756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.60</subfield><subfield code="j">Keramische Werkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Hartstoffe</subfield><subfield code="x">Werkstoffkunde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.45</subfield><subfield code="j">Gesteinshüttenkunde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="h">19746-19756</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	da Silva, Ana Carolina
spellingShingle	da Silva, Ana Carolina ddc 670 bkl 51.60 bkl 58.45 misc Zirconia misc Silver misc Soda-lime glass misc Mechanical properties Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
authorStr	da Silva, Ana Carolina
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)320584305
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	670 - Manufacturing
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0272-8842
topic_title	670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass Zirconia Silver Soda-lime glass Mechanical properties
topic	ddc 670 bkl 51.60 bkl 58.45 misc Zirconia misc Silver misc Soda-lime glass misc Mechanical properties
topic_unstemmed	ddc 670 bkl 51.60 bkl 58.45 misc Zirconia misc Silver misc Soda-lime glass misc Mechanical properties
topic_browse	ddc 670 bkl 51.60 bkl 58.45 misc Zirconia misc Silver misc Soda-lime glass misc Mechanical properties
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ceramics international
hierarchy_parent_id	320584305
dewey-tens	670 - Manufacturing
hierarchy_top_title	Ceramics international
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)320584305 (DE-600)2018052-4 (DE-576)25523063X
title	Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV007982143 (ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5
title_full	Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
author_sort	da Silva, Ana Carolina
journal	Ceramics international
journalStr	Ceramics international
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
container_start_page	19746
author_browse	da Silva, Ana Carolina de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe Campos, Tiago Bastos Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata
container_volume	48
class	670 DE-600 51.60 bkl 58.45 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	da Silva, Ana Carolina
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0003-4705-6848
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848
dewey-full	670
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
title_auth	Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
abstract	This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.
abstractGer	This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.
abstract_unstemmed	This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass
remote_bool	true
author2	de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe Campos, Tiago Bastos Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata
author2Str	de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe Campos, Tiago Bastos Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata
ppnlink	320584305
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242
up_date	2024-07-06T18:08:20.465Z
_version_	1803854073526484992
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV007982143</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524130103.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230507s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.242</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV007982143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0272-8842(22)01052-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.60</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.45</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">da Silva, Ana Carolina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study evaluated an infiltration glass over zirconia in order to form a graded layer with thermal expansion coefficient compatibility and antimicrobial capacity. 210 discs of 3Y-TZP were polished and divided into groups: YZ sintered (Sintered), YZ glazed (Glaze), YZ + Ag 5% (Ag 5%), YZ + Ag 4% (Ag 4%), YZ glass infiltrated (INF.), YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 5% (INF. + Ag 5%) and YZ glass infiltrated + Ag 4% (INF. + Ag 4%). Analyzes of biaxial flexural strength, X-ray diffraction (XRD), EDS, translucency, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fractographic were performed. The biofilm was quantified by counting the colony forming units (CFU/mL) of S. mutans. Strength values (MPa), translucency and CFU data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Weibull analysis was performed to calculate the material's modulus (m) and characteristic strength (95% CI). Infiltrated zirconia glass (INF.: 1149.7; INF. + Ag 4%: 928.2; INF. + Ag 5%: 791.5), sintered (819.0) or glazed (790.8) showed higher flexural strength (MPa) than silver-doped soda-lime glass zirconia without infiltration glass (Ag 5%: 612.1; Ag 4%: 519.2). Diffractograms showed combeite crystals in INF. + Ag 4%/5%. EDS analysis of Ag 5% group showed the higher quantity of silver when compared to INF. + Ag 5% group. Silver-doped soda-lime glass did not affect the translucency, while infiltration glass decreased the values. SEM showed irregularities on the surface of the silver-doped soda-lime glass groups and a smooth surface on the glass and glaze groups. Fracture origin of all groups was in the glaze layer and silver-doped soda-lime glass, while it was inside the zirconia in the INF. group. Lowest colony growth was observed in the Ag 5%. Glass-infiltrated zirconia showed greater strength, while Ag 5% presented greater antimicrobial capacity. The application of silver-doped soda-lime glass did not influence zirconia translucency, while glass infiltration decreased it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Zirconia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Silver</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soda-lime glass</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mechanical properties</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Oliveira Pinto Ribeiro, Amanda</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4705-6848</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martins Alves, Larissa Marcia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">de Camargo Ribeiro, Felipe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Campos, Tiago Bastos</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marques de Melo Marinho, Renata</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Ceramics international</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1995</subfield><subfield code="g">48, Seite 19746-19756</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320584305</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2018052-4</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)25523063X</subfield><subfield code="x">0272-8842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19746-19756</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.60</subfield><subfield code="j">Keramische Werkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Hartstoffe</subfield><subfield code="x">Werkstoffkunde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.45</subfield><subfield code="j">Gesteinshüttenkunde</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="h">19746-19756</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401127

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Zirconia gradation and thermal expansion compatibility between infiltration glass and antimicrobial glass

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?