Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study

Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Choi, Hye Jung [verfasserIn] LeBlanc, Marissa [verfasserIn] Moger, Tron Anders [verfasserIn] Valberg, Morten [verfasserIn] Aamodt, Geir [verfasserIn] Page, Christian M. [verfasserIn] Tell, Grethe S. [verfasserIn] Næss, Øyvind [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Social science & medicine - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967, 309
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:309

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252

Katalog-ID:	ELV008386935

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV008386935
003	DE-627
005	20230524143552.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230508s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV008386935
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 300 \|a 610 \|q DE-600
084			\|a 44.06 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Choi, Hye Jung \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.
650		4	\|a Stroke
650		4	\|a Post-stroke survival
650		4	\|a Familial support
650		4	\|a Social support
650		4	\|a Informal care
650		4	\|a Family
650		4	\|a Distance
650		4	\|a Norway
700	1		\|a LeBlanc, Marissa \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Moger, Tron Anders \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Valberg, Morten \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Aamodt, Geir \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Page, Christian M. \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Tell, Grethe S. \|e verfasserin \|0 (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Næss, Øyvind \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Social science & medicine \|d Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 \|g 309 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)306710528 \|w (DE-600)1500748-0 \|w (DE-576)082435901 \|x 1873-5347 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:309
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_101
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2038
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2065
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2068
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2113
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2118
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2522
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
936	b	k	\|a 44.06 \|j Medizinsoziologie
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 309

Indexfelder

author_variant	h j c hj hjc m l ml t a m ta tam m v mv g a ga c m p cm cmp g s t gs gst ø n øn
matchkey_str	article:18735347:2022----::toeuvvlntematfegahcrxmttfmlmmespp
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
bklnumber	44.06
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 doi (DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Choi, Hye Jung verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 aut Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation. Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway LeBlanc, Marissa verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 aut Moger, Tron Anders verfasserin aut Valberg, Morten verfasserin aut Aamodt, Geir verfasserin aut Page, Christian M. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 aut Tell, Grethe S. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 aut Næss, Øyvind verfasserin aut Enthalten in Social science & medicine Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 309 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901 1873-5347 nnns volume:309 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.06 Medizinsoziologie AR 309
spelling	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 doi (DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Choi, Hye Jung verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 aut Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation. Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway LeBlanc, Marissa verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 aut Moger, Tron Anders verfasserin aut Valberg, Morten verfasserin aut Aamodt, Geir verfasserin aut Page, Christian M. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 aut Tell, Grethe S. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 aut Næss, Øyvind verfasserin aut Enthalten in Social science & medicine Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 309 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901 1873-5347 nnns volume:309 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.06 Medizinsoziologie AR 309
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 doi (DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Choi, Hye Jung verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 aut Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation. Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway LeBlanc, Marissa verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 aut Moger, Tron Anders verfasserin aut Valberg, Morten verfasserin aut Aamodt, Geir verfasserin aut Page, Christian M. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 aut Tell, Grethe S. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 aut Næss, Øyvind verfasserin aut Enthalten in Social science & medicine Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 309 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901 1873-5347 nnns volume:309 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.06 Medizinsoziologie AR 309
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 doi (DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Choi, Hye Jung verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 aut Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation. Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway LeBlanc, Marissa verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 aut Moger, Tron Anders verfasserin aut Valberg, Morten verfasserin aut Aamodt, Geir verfasserin aut Page, Christian M. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 aut Tell, Grethe S. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 aut Næss, Øyvind verfasserin aut Enthalten in Social science & medicine Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 309 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901 1873-5347 nnns volume:309 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.06 Medizinsoziologie AR 309
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252 doi (DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Choi, Hye Jung verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 aut Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation. Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway LeBlanc, Marissa verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 aut Moger, Tron Anders verfasserin aut Valberg, Morten verfasserin aut Aamodt, Geir verfasserin aut Page, Christian M. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 aut Tell, Grethe S. verfasserin (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638 aut Næss, Øyvind verfasserin aut Enthalten in Social science & medicine Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967 309 Online-Ressource (DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901 1873-5347 nnns volume:309 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 44.06 Medizinsoziologie AR 309
language	English
source	Enthalten in Social science & medicine 309 volume:309
sourceStr	Enthalten in Social science & medicine 309 volume:309
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Medizinsoziologie
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway
dewey-raw	300
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Social science & medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Choi, Hye Jung @@aut@@ LeBlanc, Marissa @@aut@@ Moger, Tron Anders @@aut@@ Valberg, Morten @@aut@@ Aamodt, Geir @@aut@@ Page, Christian M. @@aut@@ Tell, Grethe S. @@aut@@ Næss, Øyvind @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	306710528
dewey-sort	3300
id	ELV008386935
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV008386935</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524143552.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230508s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV008386935</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Hye Jung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stroke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Post-stroke survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Familial support</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social support</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informal care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LeBlanc, Marissa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moger, Tron Anders</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valberg, Morten</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aamodt, Geir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Page, Christian M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tell, Grethe S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Næss, Øyvind</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Social science & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">309</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306710528</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1500748-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)082435901</subfield><subfield code="x">1873-5347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.06</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinsoziologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">309</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Choi, Hye Jung
spellingShingle	Choi, Hye Jung ddc 300 bkl 44.06 misc Stroke misc Post-stroke survival misc Familial support misc Social support misc Informal care misc Family misc Distance misc Norway Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
authorStr	Choi, Hye Jung
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)306710528
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	300 - Social sciences 610 - Medicine & health
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1873-5347
topic_title	300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study Stroke Post-stroke survival Familial support Social support Informal care Family Distance Norway
topic	ddc 300 bkl 44.06 misc Stroke misc Post-stroke survival misc Familial support misc Social support misc Informal care misc Family misc Distance misc Norway
topic_unstemmed	ddc 300 bkl 44.06 misc Stroke misc Post-stroke survival misc Familial support misc Social support misc Informal care misc Family misc Distance misc Norway
topic_browse	ddc 300 bkl 44.06 misc Stroke misc Post-stroke survival misc Familial support misc Social support misc Informal care misc Family misc Distance misc Norway
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Social science & medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	306710528
dewey-tens	300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology 610 - Medicine & health
hierarchy_top_title	Social science & medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)306710528 (DE-600)1500748-0 (DE-576)082435901
title	Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV008386935 (ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5
title_full	Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
author_sort	Choi, Hye Jung
journal	Social science & medicine
journalStr	Social science & medicine
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Choi, Hye Jung LeBlanc, Marissa Moger, Tron Anders Valberg, Morten Aamodt, Geir Page, Christian M. Tell, Grethe S. Næss, Øyvind
container_volume	309
class	300 610 DE-600 44.06 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Choi, Hye Jung
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252
normlink	(ORCID)0000-0003-4957-0664 (ORCID)0000-0003-2148-2814 (ORCID)0000-0002-1897-3666 (ORCID)0000-0003-1386-1638
normlink_prefix_str_mv	(orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664 (orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814 (orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666 (orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638
dewey-full	300 610
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: a population-based cohort study
title_auth	Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
abstract	Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.
abstractGer	Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393
title_short	Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study
remote_bool	true
author2	LeBlanc, Marissa Moger, Tron Anders Valberg, Morten Aamodt, Geir Page, Christian M. Tell, Grethe S. Næss, Øyvind
author2Str	LeBlanc, Marissa Moger, Tron Anders Valberg, Morten Aamodt, Geir Page, Christian M. Tell, Grethe S. Næss, Øyvind
ppnlink	306710528
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252
up_date	2024-07-06T19:31:40.926Z
_version_	1803859316887781376
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV008386935</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230524143552.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230508s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115252</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV008386935</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0277-9536(22)00558-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.06</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Choi, Hye Jung</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-4957-0664</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Familial support may be important for post-stroke survival.Objective: To determine if geographical proximity between stroke survivors and their family members, i.e having a spouse/partner or distance to a nearest first-degree relative (parents, siblings, and offspring), as a proxy for familial support, is related to survivor mortality.Methods: This study included all stroke survivors (n=128,227) hospitalised in Norway from 1994 to 2009, who were 30 years or older at the time of the stroke (born before 1965). National registries and censuses were used to calculate the distance to the nearest first-degree relative in the hospitalisation year. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality from 1994 to 2014 (mean 6.4 years follow-up), adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.Results: Living up to 30 km from the nearest first-degree relative was associated with a higher mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.06) than those living in the same household or neighbourhood as their nearest first-degree relatives. The association was more pronounced (1.13, 1.08 to 1.19 for ≤30 km; 1.25, 1.16 to 1.35 for >30 km) in survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years, compared to older survivors. Among familial care predictors, having a spouse/partner was the most prominent predictor of reduced mortality (0.80, 0.78 to 0.82) in stroke survivors.Conclusion: Living close to first-degree relatives was weakly associated with better survival in stroke patients while having a spouse/partner exhibited a stronger association. Both associations were larger for survivors hospitalised at age ≤65 years. Our findings thus suggest that the impact of familial support on survival after stroke may differ by familial support condition and patient's age at a stroke hospitalisation.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stroke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Post-stroke survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Familial support</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social support</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Informal care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Family</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Distance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LeBlanc, Marissa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-2148-2814</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moger, Tron Anders</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Valberg, Morten</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aamodt, Geir</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Page, Christian M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1897-3666</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tell, Grethe S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0003-1386-1638</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Næss, Øyvind</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Social science & medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier Science, 1967</subfield><subfield code="g">309</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)306710528</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1500748-0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)082435901</subfield><subfield code="x">1873-5347</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:309</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.06</subfield><subfield code="j">Medizinsoziologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">309</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400141

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Stroke survival and the impact of geographic proximity to family members: A population-based cohort study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?