Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance
In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compres...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sharma, Deepak [verfasserIn] Hiremath, Somashekhar S. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2022 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Composite structures - Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983, 303 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:303 |
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV010451471 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV010451471 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230615073236.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230615s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV010451471 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
084 | |a 51.75 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sharma, Deepak |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Lattice structure | |
650 | 4 | |a Energy absorption | |
650 | 4 | |a Fused filament fabrication | |
650 | 4 | |a Additive manufacturing | |
650 | 4 | |a Multi-material | |
700 | 1 | |a Hiremath, Somashekhar S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Composite structures |d Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 |g 303 |w (DE-627)320509044 |w (DE-600)2013177-X |w (DE-576)094531447 |x 0263-8223 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:303 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_32 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_150 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2015 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2020 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2021 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2027 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2038 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2049 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2050 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2056 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2059 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2061 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2065 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2068 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2088 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2113 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2118 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2147 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2148 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2190 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2470 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2507 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2522 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4242 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4333 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4334 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4393 | ||
936 | b | k | |a 51.75 |j Verbundwerkstoffe |j Schichtstoffe |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 303 |
author_variant |
d s ds s s h ss ssh |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:02638223:2022----::xeietlnfmtdotenlnadupaeoddeesbeulaeiliisieltietutrsi |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
bklnumber |
51.75 |
publishDate |
2022 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 doi (DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 VZ 51.75 bkl Sharma, Deepak verfasserin aut Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material Hiremath, Somashekhar S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 303 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:303 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe VZ AR 303 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 doi (DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 VZ 51.75 bkl Sharma, Deepak verfasserin aut Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material Hiremath, Somashekhar S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 303 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:303 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe VZ AR 303 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 doi (DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 VZ 51.75 bkl Sharma, Deepak verfasserin aut Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material Hiremath, Somashekhar S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 303 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:303 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe VZ AR 303 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 doi (DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 VZ 51.75 bkl Sharma, Deepak verfasserin aut Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material Hiremath, Somashekhar S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 303 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:303 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe VZ AR 303 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 doi (DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 670 VZ 51.75 bkl Sharma, Deepak verfasserin aut Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance 2022 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material Hiremath, Somashekhar S. verfasserin aut Enthalten in Composite structures Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983 303 (DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 0263-8223 nnns volume:303 GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 51.75 Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe VZ AR 303 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Composite structures 303 volume:303 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Composite structures 303 volume:303 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Verbundwerkstoffe Schichtstoffe |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material |
dewey-raw |
670 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Composite structures |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sharma, Deepak @@aut@@ Hiremath, Somashekhar S. @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
320509044 |
dewey-sort |
3670 |
id |
ELV010451471 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV010451471</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230615073236.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230615s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV010451471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, Deepak</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lattice structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy absorption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fused filament fabrication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additive manufacturing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-material</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hiremath, Somashekhar S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Composite structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">303</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320509044</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013177-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094531447</subfield><subfield code="x">0263-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="j">Verbundwerkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Schichtstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">303</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Sharma, Deepak |
spellingShingle |
Sharma, Deepak ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc Lattice structure misc Energy absorption misc Fused filament fabrication misc Additive manufacturing misc Multi-material Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
authorStr |
Sharma, Deepak |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)320509044 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
0263-8223 |
topic_title |
670 VZ 51.75 bkl Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance Lattice structure Energy absorption Fused filament fabrication Additive manufacturing Multi-material |
topic |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc Lattice structure misc Energy absorption misc Fused filament fabrication misc Additive manufacturing misc Multi-material |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc Lattice structure misc Energy absorption misc Fused filament fabrication misc Additive manufacturing misc Multi-material |
topic_browse |
ddc 670 bkl 51.75 misc Lattice structure misc Energy absorption misc Fused filament fabrication misc Additive manufacturing misc Multi-material |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Composite structures |
hierarchy_parent_id |
320509044 |
dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Composite structures |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)320509044 (DE-600)2013177-X (DE-576)094531447 |
title |
Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV010451471 (ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6 |
title_full |
Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
author_sort |
Sharma, Deepak |
journal |
Composite structures |
journalStr |
Composite structures |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2022 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
author_browse |
Sharma, Deepak Hiremath, Somashekhar S. |
container_volume |
303 |
class |
670 VZ 51.75 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sharma, Deepak |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 |
dewey-full |
670 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
experimental and fem study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
title_auth |
Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
abstract |
In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. |
abstractGer |
In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U SYSFLAG_U GBV_ELV GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2038 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2065 GBV_ILN_2068 GBV_ILN_2088 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2113 GBV_ILN_2118 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_2522 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 |
title_short |
Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hiremath, Somashekhar S. |
author2Str |
Hiremath, Somashekhar S. |
ppnlink |
320509044 |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T18:02:16.486Z |
_version_ |
1803853691866841088 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000naa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV010451471</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230615073236.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230615s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116353</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV010451471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0263-8223(22)01085-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sharma, Deepak</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Experimental and FEM study on the in-plane and out-plane loaded reversible dual-material bio-inspired lattice structures with improved energy absorption performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the current study, bio-inspired lattice structures are derived from the architecture of the Euplectella aspergillum (sea sponge). All the lattice structures are fabricated using the fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The fabricated structures are subjected to quasi-static uni-axial compressive in-plane and out-plane loading conditions. The results shows that energy absorption performance of lattice structures also depends on the structure's stiffness. When used in lattice structures, soft material like thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has good energy absorbing performance. However, the stiffness of soft materials is not good enough to increase energy absorption. Here an attempt has been made to increase the energy absorption capacity of lattice structures by using a combination of hard (PLA) and soft phase (TPU) material in the fabrication of structures. Overall, the mechanical properties and deformation behavior in the experimental and finite element studies are quite similar. Structures under in-plane loading conditions showed a shorter linear elastic region and longer plateau region, whereas the structures subjected to out-plane loading conditions showed longer nonlinear elastic regions and a shorter plateau region. Overall, the structures loaded in the in-plane condition have a more stable response, whereas those loaded in the out-plane loading conditions have higher mean plateau stress, higher energy absorption and better efficiency. In both in-plane and out-plane loaded structures, dual-material fabricated structures showed higher efficiency; in-plane structures showed the highest experimental efficiency of 0.453 whereas out-plane structures showed the highest efficiency of 0.470. Combination of dual-material showed improved performance without compromising the reversibility of the energy absorbers. Hence this study opens a field for the design and fabrication of better energy absorbers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lattice structure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy absorption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Fused filament fabrication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Additive manufacturing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Multi-material</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hiremath, Somashekhar S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Composite structures</subfield><subfield code="d">Amsterdam : Elsevier, 1983</subfield><subfield code="g">303</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320509044</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2013177-X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)094531447</subfield><subfield code="x">0263-8223</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2068</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2113</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2118</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2522</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.75</subfield><subfield code="j">Verbundwerkstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Schichtstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">303</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.397401 |