Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15

This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel....
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Tang, Tianbo [verfasserIn] McCaffery, Cavan [verfasserIn] Ma, Tianyi [verfasserIn] Hao, Peng [verfasserIn] Durbin, Thomas D. [verfasserIn] Johnson, Kent C. [verfasserIn] Karavalakis, Georgios [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2023

Schlagwörter:	Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs

Übergeordnetes Werk:	Enthalten in: Fuel - New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970, 350
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:350

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836

Katalog-ID:	ELV010540962

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	ELV010540962
003	DE-627
005	20230927084217.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)ELV010540962
035			\|a (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rda
041			\|a eng
082	0	4	\|a 660 \|q VZ
084			\|a 58.21 \|2 bkl
100	1		\|a Tang, Tianbo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
264		1	\|c 2023
336			\|a nicht spezifiziert \|b zzz \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.
650		4	\|a Ethanol
650		4	\|a Gasoline vehicles
650		4	\|a NOx emissions
650		4	\|a Particulate emissions
650		4	\|a VOCs
700	1		\|a McCaffery, Cavan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Ma, Tianyi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Hao, Peng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Durbin, Thomas D. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Johnson, Kent C. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	1		\|a Karavalakis, Georgios \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Fuel \|d New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 \|g 350 \|h Online-Ressource \|w (DE-627)300898584 \|w (DE-600)1483656-7 \|w (DE-576)09555176X \|x 0016-2361 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:350
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_U
912			\|a GBV_ELV
912			\|a SYSFLAG_U
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_32
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_90
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_150
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_187
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2049
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2059
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2129
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2470
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2507
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4333
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4334
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
936	b	k	\|a 58.21 \|j Brennstoffe \|j Kraftstoffe \|j Explosivstoffe \|q VZ
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 350

Indexfelder

author_variant	t t tt c m cm t m tm p h ph t d d td tdd k c j kc kcj g k gk
matchkey_str	article:00162361:2023----::xadntetaobedalnaionamsincma
hierarchy_sort_str	2023
bklnumber	58.21
publishDate	2023
allfields	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 doi (DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Tang, Tianbo verfasserin aut Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10. Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs McCaffery, Cavan verfasserin aut Ma, Tianyi verfasserin aut Hao, Peng verfasserin aut Durbin, Thomas D. verfasserin aut Johnson, Kent C. verfasserin aut Karavalakis, Georgios verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fuel New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 350 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X 0016-2361 nnns volume:350 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 350
spelling	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 doi (DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Tang, Tianbo verfasserin aut Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10. Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs McCaffery, Cavan verfasserin aut Ma, Tianyi verfasserin aut Hao, Peng verfasserin aut Durbin, Thomas D. verfasserin aut Johnson, Kent C. verfasserin aut Karavalakis, Georgios verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fuel New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 350 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X 0016-2361 nnns volume:350 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 350
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 doi (DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Tang, Tianbo verfasserin aut Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10. Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs McCaffery, Cavan verfasserin aut Ma, Tianyi verfasserin aut Hao, Peng verfasserin aut Durbin, Thomas D. verfasserin aut Johnson, Kent C. verfasserin aut Karavalakis, Georgios verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fuel New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 350 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X 0016-2361 nnns volume:350 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 350
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 doi (DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Tang, Tianbo verfasserin aut Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10. Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs McCaffery, Cavan verfasserin aut Ma, Tianyi verfasserin aut Hao, Peng verfasserin aut Durbin, Thomas D. verfasserin aut Johnson, Kent C. verfasserin aut Karavalakis, Georgios verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fuel New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 350 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X 0016-2361 nnns volume:350 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 350
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836 doi (DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rda eng 660 VZ 58.21 bkl Tang, Tianbo verfasserin aut Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 2023 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10. Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs McCaffery, Cavan verfasserin aut Ma, Tianyi verfasserin aut Hao, Peng verfasserin aut Durbin, Thomas D. verfasserin aut Johnson, Kent C. verfasserin aut Karavalakis, Georgios verfasserin aut Enthalten in Fuel New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970 350 Online-Ressource (DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X 0016-2361 nnns volume:350 GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700 58.21 Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe VZ AR 350
language	English
source	Enthalten in Fuel 350 volume:350
sourceStr	Enthalten in Fuel 350 volume:350
format_phy_str_mv	Article
bklname	Brennstoffe Kraftstoffe Explosivstoffe
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs
dewey-raw	660
isfreeaccess_bool	false
container_title	Fuel
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Tang, Tianbo @@aut@@ McCaffery, Cavan @@aut@@ Ma, Tianyi @@aut@@ Hao, Peng @@aut@@ Durbin, Thomas D. @@aut@@ Johnson, Kent C. @@aut@@ Karavalakis, Georgios @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2023-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	300898584
dewey-sort	3660
id	ELV010540962
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV010540962</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230927084217.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV010540962</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Tianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethanol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gasoline vehicles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NOx emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Particulate emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VOCs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McCaffery, Cavan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ma, Tianyi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Durbin, Thomas D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Kent C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karavalakis, Georgios</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Fuel</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">350</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300898584</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483656-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)09555176X</subfield><subfield code="x">0016-2361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Kraftstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Explosivstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">350</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Tang, Tianbo
spellingShingle	Tang, Tianbo ddc 660 bkl 58.21 misc Ethanol misc Gasoline vehicles misc NOx emissions misc Particulate emissions misc VOCs Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
authorStr	Tang, Tianbo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)300898584
format	electronic Article
dewey-ones	660 - Chemical engineering
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	elsevier
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	0016-2361
topic_title	660 VZ 58.21 bkl Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15 Ethanol Gasoline vehicles NOx emissions Particulate emissions VOCs
topic	ddc 660 bkl 58.21 misc Ethanol misc Gasoline vehicles misc NOx emissions misc Particulate emissions misc VOCs
topic_unstemmed	ddc 660 bkl 58.21 misc Ethanol misc Gasoline vehicles misc NOx emissions misc Particulate emissions misc VOCs
topic_browse	ddc 660 bkl 58.21 misc Ethanol misc Gasoline vehicles misc NOx emissions misc Particulate emissions misc VOCs
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Fuel
hierarchy_parent_id	300898584
dewey-tens	660 - Chemical engineering
hierarchy_top_title	Fuel
isfreeaccess_txt	false
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)300898584 (DE-600)1483656-7 (DE-576)09555176X
title	Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
ctrlnum	(DE-627)ELV010540962 (ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7
title_full	Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
author_sort	Tang, Tianbo
journal	Fuel
journalStr	Fuel
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	false
dewey-hundreds	600 - Technology
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2023
contenttype_str_mv	zzz
author_browse	Tang, Tianbo McCaffery, Cavan Ma, Tianyi Hao, Peng Durbin, Thomas D. Johnson, Kent C. Karavalakis, Georgios
container_volume	350
class	660 VZ 58.21 bkl
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Tang, Tianbo
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836
dewey-full	660
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	expanding the ethanol blend wall in california: emissions comparison between e10 and e15
title_auth	Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
abstract	This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.
abstractGer	This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.
abstract_unstemmed	This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_32 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_150 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2007 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2015 GBV_ILN_2020 GBV_ILN_2021 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2026 GBV_ILN_2027 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2049 GBV_ILN_2050 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2056 GBV_ILN_2059 GBV_ILN_2061 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2110 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2190 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_2470 GBV_ILN_2507 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4242 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4333 GBV_ILN_4334 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4393 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15
remote_bool	true
author2	McCaffery, Cavan Ma, Tianyi Hao, Peng Durbin, Thomas D. Johnson, Kent C. Karavalakis, Georgios
author2Str	McCaffery, Cavan Ma, Tianyi Hao, Peng Durbin, Thomas D. Johnson, Kent C. Karavalakis, Georgios
ppnlink	300898584
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	false
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836
up_date	2024-07-06T18:21:14.244Z
_version_	1803854884891525120
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV010540962</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230927084217.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230618s2023 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128836</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV010540962</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0016-2361(23)01449-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tang, Tianbo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2023</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This study assessed the potential of increasing ethanol content in California reformulated gasoline (CaRFG) by investigating the exhaust emissions from a fleet of 20 light-duty vehicles. A baseline CaRFG E10 (10% ethanol by volume) fuel was splash blended with denatured ethanol to create a E15 fuel. Each vehicle/fuel combination were exercised over triplicate Federal Test Procedure (FTP) cycles on a chassis dynamometer. Our results showed no statistically significant fuel effect on nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions for E15, whereas total hydrocarbons (THC), non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), and carbon monoxide (CO) showed either marginally or statistically significant reductions for E15. Particulate matter (PM) and solid particle number emissions were positively impacted by ethanol, exhibiting statistically significant reductions. Acetaldehyde and ethanol emissions responded strongly with ethanol across the fleet of 20 vehicles, while formaldehyde emissions did not show a statistically significant effect. Monoaromatic species and 1,3-butadiene showed mixed results, with ethylbenzene and the xylene isomers showing strong fuel differences. Although no strong differences were found for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, E15 showed life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings when compared to E10.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethanol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gasoline vehicles</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NOx emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Particulate emissions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">VOCs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">McCaffery, Cavan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ma, Tianyi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hao, Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Durbin, Thomas D.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnson, Kent C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karavalakis, Georgios</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="t">Fuel</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY [u.a.] : Elsevier, 1970</subfield><subfield code="g">350</subfield><subfield code="h">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)300898584</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1483656-7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-576)09555176X</subfield><subfield code="x">0016-2361</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2049</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2059</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2061</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2190</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4333</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">58.21</subfield><subfield code="j">Brennstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Kraftstoffe</subfield><subfield code="j">Explosivstoffe</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">350</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399164

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Expanding the ethanol blend wall in California: Emissions comparison between E10 and E15

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?