The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering
Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Spitaleri, C. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
4 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults - Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER, 2016, Amsterdam |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:755 ; year:2016 ; day:10 ; month:04 ; pages:275-278 ; extent:4 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV014077159 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV014077159 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625112900.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000204A.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV014077159 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Spitaleri, C. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 4 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. | ||
520 | |a Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Bertulani, C.A. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fortunato, L. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vitturi, A. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n North-Holland Publ |a Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER |t Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |d 2016 |g Amsterdam |w (DE-627)ELV000151122 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:755 |g year:2016 |g day:10 |g month:04 |g pages:275-278 |g extent:4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 755 |j 2016 |b 10 |c 0410 |h 275-278 |g 4 |
author_variant |
c s cs |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
spitalericbertulanicafortunatolvitturia:2016----:heetosreiguzennc |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
77.50 |
publishDate |
2016 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 doi GBV00000000000204A.pica (DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Spitaleri, C. verfasserin aut The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering 2016transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Bertulani, C.A. oth Fortunato, L. oth Vitturi, A. oth Enthalten in North-Holland Publ Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults 2016 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000151122 volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 755 2016 10 0410 275-278 4 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 doi GBV00000000000204A.pica (DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Spitaleri, C. verfasserin aut The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering 2016transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Bertulani, C.A. oth Fortunato, L. oth Vitturi, A. oth Enthalten in North-Holland Publ Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults 2016 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000151122 volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 755 2016 10 0410 275-278 4 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 doi GBV00000000000204A.pica (DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Spitaleri, C. verfasserin aut The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering 2016transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Bertulani, C.A. oth Fortunato, L. oth Vitturi, A. oth Enthalten in North-Holland Publ Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults 2016 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000151122 volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 755 2016 10 0410 275-278 4 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 doi GBV00000000000204A.pica (DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Spitaleri, C. verfasserin aut The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering 2016transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Bertulani, C.A. oth Fortunato, L. oth Vitturi, A. oth Enthalten in North-Holland Publ Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults 2016 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000151122 volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 755 2016 10 0410 275-278 4 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 doi GBV00000000000204A.pica (DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl Spitaleri, C. verfasserin aut The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering 2016transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. Bertulani, C.A. oth Fortunato, L. oth Vitturi, A. oth Enthalten in North-Holland Publ Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults 2016 Amsterdam (DE-627)ELV000151122 volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ AR 755 2016 10 0410 275-278 4 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults Amsterdam volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults Amsterdam volume:755 year:2016 day:10 month:04 pages:275-278 extent:4 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Psychophysiologie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Spitaleri, C. @@aut@@ Bertulani, C.A. @@oth@@ Fortunato, L. @@oth@@ Vitturi, A. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-10T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000151122 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
ELV014077159 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014077159</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625112900.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000204A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014077159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spitaleri, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bertulani, C.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fortunato, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vitturi, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">North-Holland Publ</subfield><subfield code="a">Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000151122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:755</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:275-278</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">755</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">0410</subfield><subfield code="h">275-278</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Spitaleri, C. |
spellingShingle |
Spitaleri, C. ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
authorStr |
Spitaleri, C. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000151122 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
topic |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 610 bkl 77.50 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
c b cb l f lf a v av |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000151122 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 610 - Medicine & health |
hierarchy_top_title |
Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000151122 |
title |
The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV014077159 (ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5 |
title_full |
The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
author_sort |
Spitaleri, C. |
journal |
Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |
journalStr |
Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2016 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
275 |
author_browse |
Spitaleri, C. |
container_volume |
755 |
physical |
4 |
class |
530 DE-600 610 VZ 77.50 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Spitaleri, C. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |
dewey-full |
530 610 |
title_sort |
electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
title_auth |
The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
abstract |
Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. |
abstractGer |
Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Bertulani, C.A. Fortunato, L. Vitturi, A. |
author2Str |
Bertulani, C.A. Fortunato, L. Vitturi, A. |
ppnlink |
ELV000151122 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T20:31:06.299Z |
_version_ |
1803863055452340224 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014077159</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625112900.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000204A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014077159</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0370-2693(16)00115-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spitaleri, C.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The electron screening puzzle and nuclear clustering</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Accurate measurements of nuclear reactions of astrophysical interest within, or close to, the Gamow peak show evidence of an unexpected effect attributed to the presence of atomic electrons in the target. The experiments need to include an effective “screening” potential to explain the enhancement of the cross sections at the lowest measurable energies. Despite various theoretical studies conducted over the past 20 years and numerous experimental measurements, a theory has not yet been found that can explain the cause of the exceedingly high values of the screening potential needed to explain the data. In this letter we show that instead of an atomic physics solution of the “electron screening puzzle”, the reason for the large screening potential values is in fact due to clusterization effects in nuclear reactions, in particular for reaction involving light nuclei.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bertulani, C.A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fortunato, L.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vitturi, A.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">North-Holland Publ</subfield><subfield code="a">Steiner, Genevieve Z. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Applying the Go/NoGo processing schema to a visual oddball task in older adults</subfield><subfield code="d">2016</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000151122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:755</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">day:10</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:275-278</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.019</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">755</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="b">10</subfield><subfield code="c">0410</subfield><subfield code="h">275-278</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4026117 |