Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station
Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of ga...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sakamoto, Junji [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
9 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs - Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER, 2018, official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy, New York, NY [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:41 ; year:2016 ; number:3 ; day:21 ; month:01 ; pages:2096-2104 ; extent:9 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV014127520 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV014127520 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625112954.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016012000025.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV014127520 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 660 |a 620 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 660 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 44.94 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sakamoto, Junji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 9 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. | ||
| 520 | |a Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Thermal radiation |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Domino effect |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Liquid hydrogen storage tank |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gasoline pool fire |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Safety distance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hydrogen fueling station |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nakayama, Jo |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nakarai, Toyoaki |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kasai, Naoya |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shibutani, Tadahiro |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miyake, Atsumi |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER |t External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |d 2018 |d official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000127019 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g day:21 |g month:01 |g pages:2096-2104 |g extent:9 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.94 |j Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 41 |j 2016 |e 3 |b 21 |c 0121 |h 2096-2104 |g 9 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 660 | ||
| author_variant |
j s js |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
sakamotojunjinakayamajonakaraitoyoakikas:2016----:fetfaoieolieniudyrgntrgtnihbihdoe |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
44.94 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 doi GBVA2016012000025.pica (DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Sakamoto, Junji verfasserin aut Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier Nakayama, Jo oth Nakarai, Toyoaki oth Kasai, Naoya oth Shibutani, Tadahiro oth Miyake, Atsumi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs 2018 official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000127019 volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 41 2016 3 21 0121 2096-2104 9 045F 660 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 doi GBVA2016012000025.pica (DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Sakamoto, Junji verfasserin aut Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier Nakayama, Jo oth Nakarai, Toyoaki oth Kasai, Naoya oth Shibutani, Tadahiro oth Miyake, Atsumi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs 2018 official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000127019 volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 41 2016 3 21 0121 2096-2104 9 045F 660 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 doi GBVA2016012000025.pica (DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Sakamoto, Junji verfasserin aut Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier Nakayama, Jo oth Nakarai, Toyoaki oth Kasai, Naoya oth Shibutani, Tadahiro oth Miyake, Atsumi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs 2018 official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000127019 volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 41 2016 3 21 0121 2096-2104 9 045F 660 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 doi GBVA2016012000025.pica (DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Sakamoto, Junji verfasserin aut Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier Nakayama, Jo oth Nakarai, Toyoaki oth Kasai, Naoya oth Shibutani, Tadahiro oth Miyake, Atsumi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs 2018 official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000127019 volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 41 2016 3 21 0121 2096-2104 9 045F 660 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 doi GBVA2016012000025.pica (DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Sakamoto, Junji verfasserin aut Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station 2016transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier Nakayama, Jo oth Nakarai, Toyoaki oth Kasai, Naoya oth Shibutani, Tadahiro oth Miyake, Atsumi oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs 2018 official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000127019 volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA 44.94 Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde VZ AR 41 2016 3 21 0121 2096-2104 9 045F 660 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs New York, NY [u.a.] volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs New York, NY [u.a.] volume:41 year:2016 number:3 day:21 month:01 pages:2096-2104 extent:9 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Thermal radiation Domino effect Liquid hydrogen storage tank Gasoline pool fire Safety distance Hydrogen fueling station |
| dewey-raw |
660 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sakamoto, Junji @@aut@@ Nakayama, Jo @@oth@@ Nakarai, Toyoaki @@oth@@ Kasai, Naoya @@oth@@ Shibutani, Tadahiro @@oth@@ Miyake, Atsumi @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-21T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000127019 |
| dewey-sort |
3660 |
| id |
ELV014127520 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014127520</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625112954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016012000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014127520</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakamoto, Junji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal radiation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Domino effect</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liquid hydrogen storage tank</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gasoline pool fire</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Safety distance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen fueling station</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nakayama, Jo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nakarai, Toyoaki</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kasai, Naoya</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shibutani, Tadahiro</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miyake, Atsumi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000127019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2096-2104</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">0121</subfield><subfield code="h">2096-2104</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sakamoto, Junji |
| spellingShingle |
Sakamoto, Junji ddc 660 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.94 Elsevier Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| authorStr |
Sakamoto, Junji |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000127019 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
660 - Chemical engineering 620 - Engineering & allied operations 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 660 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.94 Elsevier Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 660 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.94 Elsevier Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station |
| topic_browse |
ddc 660 ddc 620 ddc 610 bkl 44.94 Elsevier Thermal radiation Elsevier Domino effect Elsevier Liquid hydrogen storage tank Elsevier Gasoline pool fire Elsevier Safety distance Elsevier Hydrogen fueling station |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j n jn t n tn n k nk t s ts a m am |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000127019 |
| dewey-tens |
660 - Chemical engineering 620 - Engineering 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000127019 |
| title |
Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV014127520 (ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0 |
| title_full |
Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| author_sort |
Sakamoto, Junji |
| journal |
External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |
| journalStr |
External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
2096 |
| author_browse |
Sakamoto, Junji |
| container_volume |
41 |
| physical |
9 |
| class |
660 620 660 DE-600 620 DE-600 610 VZ 44.94 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sakamoto, Junji |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |
| dewey-full |
660 620 610 |
| title_sort |
effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| title_auth |
Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| abstract |
Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. |
| abstractGer |
Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Nakayama, Jo Nakarai, Toyoaki Kasai, Naoya Shibutani, Tadahiro Miyake, Atsumi |
| author2Str |
Nakayama, Jo Nakarai, Toyoaki Kasai, Naoya Shibutani, Tadahiro Miyake, Atsumi |
| ppnlink |
ELV000127019 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:42:40.891Z |
| _version_ |
1803863783787986944 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014127520</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625112954.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016012000025.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014127520</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-3199(15)30682-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">660</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sakamoto, Junji</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effect of gasoline pool fire on liquid hydrogen storage tank in hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling station</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Multiple-energy-fueling stations, which can supply several types of energy such as gasoline, CNG, and hydrogen, could guarantee the efficient use of space. To guide the safety management of hybrid hydrogen–gasoline fueling stations, which utilize liquid hydrogen as an energy carrier, the scale of gasoline pool fires was estimated using the hazard assessment tool Toxic Release Analysis of Chemical Emissions (TRACE). Subsequently, the temperature and the stress due to temperature distribution were estimated using ANSYS. Based on the results, the safety of liquid hydrogen storage tanks was discussed. It was inferred that the emissivity of the outer material of the tank and the safety distance between liquid hydrogen storage tanks and gasoline dispensers should be less than 0.2 and more than 8.5 m, respectively, to protect the liquid hydrogen storage tank from the gasoline pool fire. To reduce the safety distance, several measures are required, e.g. additional thermal shields such as protective intumescent paint and water sprinkler systems and an increased slope to lead gasoline off to a safe domain away from the liquid hydrogen storage tank.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal radiation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Domino effect</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Liquid hydrogen storage tank</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gasoline pool fire</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Safety distance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hydrogen fueling station</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nakayama, Jo</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nakarai, Toyoaki</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kasai, Naoya</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shibutani, Tadahiro</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miyake, Atsumi</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dedhia, Kavita ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">External auditory canal: Inferior, posterior-inferior, and anterior canal wall overhangs</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the International Association for Hydrogen Energy</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000127019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:41</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">day:21</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2096-2104</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.039</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.94</subfield><subfield code="j">Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">41</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="b">21</subfield><subfield code="c">0121</subfield><subfield code="h">2096-2104</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">660</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.402231 |