Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation
Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used f...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
22 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Technologies and practice of CO - HU, Yongle ELSEVIER, 2019, an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:96 ; year:2016 ; pages:98-119 ; extent:22 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV014378477 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV014378477 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625113451.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016017000004.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV014378477 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 530 |a 620 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 620 |q DE-600 |
| 100 | 1 | |a Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 22 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. | ||
| 520 | |a Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Ultrafiltration |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sand filter |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Renewable energy |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Salinity gradient energy |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Osmotic power |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mulligan, Catherine N. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laflamme, Claude B. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Clairet, Guillaume |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a HU, Yongle ELSEVIER |t Technologies and practice of CO |d 2019 |d an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:96 |g year:2016 |g pages:98-119 |g extent:22 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 96 |j 2016 |h 98-119 |g 22 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 530 | ||
| author_variant |
e a g eag |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
abbasigarravandelhammulligancatherinenla:2016----:oefwdfeetrtetetehdiomtcoeslntg |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 doi GBVA2016017000004.pica (DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Abbasi-Garravand, Elham verfasserin aut Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation 2016transfer abstract 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier Mulligan, Catherine N. oth Laflamme, Claude B. oth Clairet, Guillaume oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 96 2016 98-119 22 045F 530 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 doi GBVA2016017000004.pica (DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Abbasi-Garravand, Elham verfasserin aut Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation 2016transfer abstract 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier Mulligan, Catherine N. oth Laflamme, Claude B. oth Clairet, Guillaume oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 96 2016 98-119 22 045F 530 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 doi GBVA2016017000004.pica (DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Abbasi-Garravand, Elham verfasserin aut Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation 2016transfer abstract 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier Mulligan, Catherine N. oth Laflamme, Claude B. oth Clairet, Guillaume oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 96 2016 98-119 22 045F 530 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 doi GBVA2016017000004.pica (DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Abbasi-Garravand, Elham verfasserin aut Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation 2016transfer abstract 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier Mulligan, Catherine N. oth Laflamme, Claude B. oth Clairet, Guillaume oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 96 2016 98-119 22 045F 530 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 doi GBVA2016017000004.pica (DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Abbasi-Garravand, Elham verfasserin aut Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation 2016transfer abstract 22 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier Mulligan, Catherine N. oth Laflamme, Claude B. oth Clairet, Guillaume oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science HU, Yongle ELSEVIER Technologies and practice of CO 2019 an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV002723662 volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 96 2016 98-119 22 045F 530 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Technologies and practice of CO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:96 year:2016 pages:98-119 extent:22 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Ultrafiltration Sand filter Renewable energy Salinity gradient energy Osmotic power |
| dewey-raw |
530 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham @@aut@@ Mulligan, Catherine N. @@oth@@ Laflamme, Claude B. @@oth@@ Clairet, Guillaume @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV002723662 |
| dewey-sort |
3530 |
| id |
ELV014378477 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014378477</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625113451.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000004.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014378477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abbasi-Garravand, Elham</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ultrafiltration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sand filter</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Salinity gradient energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Osmotic power</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mulligan, Catherine N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laflamme, Claude B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clairet, Guillaume</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:96</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:98-119</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">96</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">98-119</subfield><subfield code="g">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |
| spellingShingle |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| authorStr |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power |
| topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 620 Elsevier Ultrafiltration Elsevier Sand filter Elsevier Renewable energy Elsevier Salinity gradient energy Elsevier Osmotic power |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
c n m cn cnm c b l cb cbl g c gc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV002723662 |
| dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV002723662 |
| title |
Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV014378477 (ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4 |
| title_full |
Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| author_sort |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |
| journal |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| journalStr |
Technologies and practice of CO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
98 |
| author_browse |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |
| container_volume |
96 |
| physical |
22 |
| class |
530 620 530 DE-600 620 DE-600 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Abbasi-Garravand, Elham |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |
| dewey-full |
530 620 |
| title_sort |
role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| title_auth |
Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| abstract |
Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. |
| abstractGer |
Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mulligan, Catherine N. Laflamme, Claude B. Clairet, Guillaume |
| author2Str |
Mulligan, Catherine N. Laflamme, Claude B. Clairet, Guillaume |
| ppnlink |
ELV002723662 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:24:55.313Z |
| _version_ |
1803866441321021440 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014378477</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625113451.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016017000004.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014378477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0960-1481(16)30335-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abbasi-Garravand, Elham</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Role of two different pretreatment methods in osmotic power (salinity gradient energy) generation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pressure retarded osmosis is a membrane based technology that produces osmotic power as a sustainable energy by using salt and fresh waters. Pretreatment reduces membrane fouling as the main challenge in Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO). In this research, ultrafiltration and a sand filter were used for removing total organic carbon (TOC), turbidity, and hardness. In trials, efficiency and required power of the two methods were compared. Highest removal efficiency of turbidity occurred at 3.72 NTU and was 100% and 68.6% for ultrafiltration and the multimedia sand filter, respectively. Maximum TOC removal in ultrafiltration multimedia sand filter was 41% and 1.5% at 6.62 mg/L TOC initial concentration respectively. In all experiments, it was indicated that ultrafiltration had better removal efficiency and consequently more potential for osmotic power generation process improvement.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ultrafiltration</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sand filter</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Renewable energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Salinity gradient energy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Osmotic power</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mulligan, Catherine N.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laflamme, Claude B.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Clairet, Guillaume</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">HU, Yongle ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Technologies and practice of CO</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal : the official journal of WREN, The World Renewable Energy Network</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV002723662</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:96</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:98-119</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.031</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">96</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">98-119</subfield><subfield code="g">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.401513 |