Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional sufferin...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Miller, Emily S. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: IS - Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER, 2018, AJOG, Orlando, Fla |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:214 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; pages:1151-1156 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV014510111 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV014510111 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625113558.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016020000014.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV014510111 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miller, Emily S. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. | ||
| 520 | |a The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a perinatal pathology |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a placental pathology |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a stillbirth |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a autopsy |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Minturn, Lucy |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Linn, Rebecca |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weese-Mayer, Debra E. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ernst, Linda M. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER |t IS |d 2018 |d AJOG |g Orlando, Fla |w (DE-627)ELV000288284 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:214 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:1151-1156 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 214 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 1151-1156 |g 6 |y 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
e s m es esm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
milleremilysminturnlucylinnrebeccaweesem:2016----:tlbrhvlainsewsassmnopaetl |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 doi GBVA2016020000014.pica (DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Miller, Emily S. verfasserin aut Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier Minturn, Lucy oth Linn, Rebecca oth Weese-Mayer, Debra E. oth Ernst, Linda M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER IS 2018 AJOG Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000288284 volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 214 2016 1 1151-1156 6 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 doi GBVA2016020000014.pica (DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Miller, Emily S. verfasserin aut Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier Minturn, Lucy oth Linn, Rebecca oth Weese-Mayer, Debra E. oth Ernst, Linda M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER IS 2018 AJOG Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000288284 volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 214 2016 1 1151-1156 6 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 doi GBVA2016020000014.pica (DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Miller, Emily S. verfasserin aut Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier Minturn, Lucy oth Linn, Rebecca oth Weese-Mayer, Debra E. oth Ernst, Linda M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER IS 2018 AJOG Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000288284 volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 214 2016 1 1151-1156 6 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 doi GBVA2016020000014.pica (DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Miller, Emily S. verfasserin aut Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier Minturn, Lucy oth Linn, Rebecca oth Weese-Mayer, Debra E. oth Ernst, Linda M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER IS 2018 AJOG Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000288284 volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 214 2016 1 1151-1156 6 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 doi GBVA2016020000014.pica (DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Miller, Emily S. verfasserin aut Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier Minturn, Lucy oth Linn, Rebecca oth Weese-Mayer, Debra E. oth Ernst, Linda M. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER IS 2018 AJOG Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000288284 volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 214 2016 1 1151-1156 6 214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.) 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in IS Orlando, Fla volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in IS Orlando, Fla volume:214 year:2016 number:1 pages:1151-1156 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
perinatal pathology placental pathology stillbirth autopsy |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
IS |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Miller, Emily S. @@aut@@ Minturn, Lucy @@oth@@ Linn, Rebecca @@oth@@ Weese-Mayer, Debra E. @@oth@@ Ernst, Linda M. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000288284 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV014510111 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014510111</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625113558.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014510111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Emily S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">perinatal pathology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">placental pathology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">stillbirth</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">autopsy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Minturn, Lucy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Linn, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weese-Mayer, Debra E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ernst, Linda M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">IS</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">AJOG</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000288284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:214</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1151-1156</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">214</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1151-1156</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield><subfield code="y">214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Miller, Emily S. |
| spellingShingle |
Miller, Emily S. ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| authorStr |
Miller, Emily S. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000288284 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier perinatal pathology Elsevier placental pathology Elsevier stillbirth Elsevier autopsy |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
l m lm r l rl d e w m dew dewm l m e lm lme |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
IS |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000288284 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
IS |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000288284 |
| title |
Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV014510111 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X |
| title_full |
Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| author_sort |
Miller, Emily S. |
| journal |
IS |
| journalStr |
IS |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1151 |
| author_browse |
Miller, Emily S. |
| container_volume |
214 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Miller, Emily S. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |
| dewey-full |
610 570 |
| title_sort |
stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| title_auth |
Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| abstract |
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. |
| abstractGer |
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Minturn, Lucy Linn, Rebecca Weese-Mayer, Debra E. Ernst, Linda M. |
| author2Str |
Minturn, Lucy Linn, Rebecca Weese-Mayer, Debra E. Ernst, Linda M. |
| ppnlink |
ELV000288284 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:43:16.416Z |
| _version_ |
1803867595910152192 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV014510111</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625113558.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV014510111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9378(15)00931-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miller, Emily S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Stillbirth evaluation: a stepwise assessment of placental pathology and autopsy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists places special emphasis on autopsy as one of the most important tests for evaluation of stillbirth. Despite a recommendation of an autopsy, many families will decline the autopsy based on religious/cultural beliefs, fear of additional suffering for the child, or belief that no additional information will be obtained or of value. Further, many obstetric providers express a myriad of barriers limiting their recommendation for a perinatal autopsy despite their understanding of its value. Consequently, perinatal autopsy rates have been declining. Without the information provided by an autopsy, many women are left with unanswered questions regarding cause of death for their fetus and without clear management strategies to reduce the risk of stillbirth in future pregnancies. To avoid this scenario, it is imperative that clinicians are knowledgeable about the benefit of autopsy so they can provide clear information on its diagnostic utility and decrease potential barriers; in so doing the obstetrician can ensure that each family has the necessary information to make an informed decision.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">perinatal pathology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">placental pathology</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">stillbirth</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">autopsy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Minturn, Lucy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Linn, Rebecca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weese-Mayer, Debra E.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ernst, Linda M.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Domingues, Sara ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">IS</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">AJOG</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000288284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:214</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1151-1156</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.049</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">214</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">1151-1156</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield><subfield code="y">214.2016, 1, 115.e1-, (6 S.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3994503 |