Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China
Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecolo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Wang, Jianjun [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
9 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO - Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER, 2020, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:152 ; year:2017 ; day:20 ; month:05 ; pages:330-338 ; extent:9 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV015314960 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV015314960 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625115003.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2017016000014.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV015314960 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 690 |a 330 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
084 | |a 35.18 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wang, Jianjun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 9 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. | ||
520 | |a Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Motivation |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Enterprise ownership |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Entropy TOPSIS |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Enterprise ecologicalization |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Gao, Jay |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Yuxiang |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kang, Yiru |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Xilai |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER |t Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |d 2020 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003750353 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:152 |g year:2017 |g day:20 |g month:05 |g pages:330-338 |g extent:9 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 35.18 |j Kolloidchemie |j Grenzflächenchemie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 152 |j 2017 |b 20 |c 0520 |h 330-338 |g 9 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 690 |
author_variant |
j w jw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
wangjianjungaojaychengyuxiangkangyirulix:2017----:clgclztomtvtosfeoreetrrssnhpnadmioeooiz |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
35.18 |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 doi GBVA2017016000014.pica (DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Wang, Jianjun verfasserin aut Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier Gao, Jay oth Cheng, Yuxiang oth Kang, Yiru oth Li, Xilai oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 152 2017 20 0520 330-338 9 045F 690 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 doi GBVA2017016000014.pica (DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Wang, Jianjun verfasserin aut Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier Gao, Jay oth Cheng, Yuxiang oth Kang, Yiru oth Li, Xilai oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 152 2017 20 0520 330-338 9 045F 690 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 doi GBVA2017016000014.pica (DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Wang, Jianjun verfasserin aut Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier Gao, Jay oth Cheng, Yuxiang oth Kang, Yiru oth Li, Xilai oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 152 2017 20 0520 330-338 9 045F 690 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 doi GBVA2017016000014.pica (DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Wang, Jianjun verfasserin aut Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier Gao, Jay oth Cheng, Yuxiang oth Kang, Yiru oth Li, Xilai oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 152 2017 20 0520 330-338 9 045F 690 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 doi GBVA2017016000014.pica (DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Wang, Jianjun verfasserin aut Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China 2017transfer abstract 9 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier Gao, Jay oth Cheng, Yuxiang oth Kang, Yiru oth Li, Xilai oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 152 2017 20 0520 330-338 9 045F 690 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:152 year:2017 day:20 month:05 pages:330-338 extent:9 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Motivation Enterprise ownership Entropy TOPSIS Enterprise ecologicalization Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone |
dewey-raw |
690 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wang, Jianjun @@aut@@ Gao, Jay @@oth@@ Cheng, Yuxiang @@oth@@ Kang, Yiru @@oth@@ Li, Xilai @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-20T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003750353 |
dewey-sort |
3690 |
id |
ELV015314960 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV015314960</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115003.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017016000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV015314960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Jianjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Motivation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enterprise ownership</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entropy TOPSIS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enterprise ecologicalization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Jay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheng, Yuxiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kang, Yiru</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xilai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:152</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:330-338</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">152</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">0520</subfield><subfield code="h">330-338</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Wang, Jianjun |
spellingShingle |
Wang, Jianjun ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
authorStr |
Wang, Jianjun |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings 330 - Economics 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone |
topic_browse |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Motivation Elsevier Enterprise ownership Elsevier Entropy TOPSIS Elsevier Enterprise ecologicalization Elsevier Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
j g jg y c yc y k yk x l xl |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003750353 |
dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction 330 - Economics 540 - Chemistry |
hierarchy_top_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
title |
Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV015314960 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0 |
title_full |
Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
author_sort |
Wang, Jianjun |
journal |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
journalStr |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences 500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
330 |
author_browse |
Wang, Jianjun |
container_volume |
152 |
physical |
9 |
class |
690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Wang, Jianjun |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |
dewey-full |
690 330 540 |
title_sort |
ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the pan-qaidam pilot economic zone of qinghai province, west china |
title_auth |
Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
abstract |
Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. |
abstractGer |
Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Gao, Jay Cheng, Yuxiang Kang, Yiru Li, Xilai |
author2Str |
Gao, Jay Cheng, Yuxiang Kang, Yiru Li, Xilai |
ppnlink |
ELV003750353 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T17:22:59.274Z |
_version_ |
1803851220150910976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV015314960</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115003.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017016000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV015314960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)30439-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wang, Jianjun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecologicalization motivations of resources enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam pilot economic zone of Qinghai Province, West China</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Enterprise eco-development is one of the effective ways to resolve the conflicts between resources exploitation and environment protection, and to realize sustainable development. A sound understanding of enterprise ecological motivation is a prerequisite and foundation of promoting enterprise ecologicalization. This study analyzes the level of eco-development of 12 resources-based enterprises in the Pan-Qaidam economic pilot area so as to determine influential motivators and to identify their eco-development paths using the entropy TOPSIS method. The results show that the level of motivation is generally low and uneven among the 12 enterprises. Enterprise ownership affects enterprise ecological motivation in the pulling force of eco-culture only. The top three motivators are the leading-force of government, the driving force of science and technology, and the pulling force of market. The remaining important motivation factors are mostly internal, including the driving force of enterprise innovation, the guiding force of eco-culture, and the induced force of interest, even though internal motivation is weaker than external motivation. In general, the 12 enterprises have an uneven distribution in their level of eco-development. The majority of them (8) fall into the type I model (weak internal and external motivation) of development, with 3 and 1 in the type II (weak internal but strong external motivation) and type III (strong internal but weak external motivation) models, respectively, without any in type IV (strong internal and external motivation). This situation can be remedied through four recommendations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Motivation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enterprise ownership</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entropy TOPSIS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Enterprise ecologicalization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pan-Qaidam economic pilot zone</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gao, Jay</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cheng, Yuxiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kang, Yiru</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Li, Xilai</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:152</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:20</subfield><subfield code="g">month:05</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:330-338</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.004</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">152</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">20</subfield><subfield code="c">0520</subfield><subfield code="h">330-338</subfield><subfield code="g">9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3992662 |