Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model
China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cos...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Peng, Pan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
13 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO - Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER, 2020, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:164 ; year:2017 ; day:15 ; month:10 ; pages:1068-1080 ; extent:13 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV015318435 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV015318435 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625115010.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000030.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV015318435 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 690 |a 330 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 540 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 35.18 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Peng, Pan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. | ||
| 520 | |a China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Cost-benefit analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cost-effectiveness analysis |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mixed policy |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abatement performance |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a DEMETER-CCPE model |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Carbon tax |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhu, Lei |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fan, Ying |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER |t Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |d 2020 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:164 |g year:2017 |g day:15 |g month:10 |g pages:1068-1080 |g extent:13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 35.18 |j Kolloidchemie |j Grenzflächenchemie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 164 |j 2017 |b 15 |c 1015 |h 1068-1080 |g 13 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 690 | ||
| author_variant |
p p pp |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
pengpanzhuleifanying:2017----:efraceautoociaeoiisnhnatdbsdnnn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
35.18 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 doi GBV00000000000030.pica (DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Peng, Pan verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier Zhu, Lei oth Fan, Ying oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 164 2017 15 1015 1068-1080 13 045F 690 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 doi GBV00000000000030.pica (DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Peng, Pan verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier Zhu, Lei oth Fan, Ying oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 164 2017 15 1015 1068-1080 13 045F 690 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 doi GBV00000000000030.pica (DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Peng, Pan verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier Zhu, Lei oth Fan, Ying oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 164 2017 15 1015 1068-1080 13 045F 690 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 doi GBV00000000000030.pica (DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Peng, Pan verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier Zhu, Lei oth Fan, Ying oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 164 2017 15 1015 1068-1080 13 045F 690 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 doi GBV00000000000030.pica (DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Peng, Pan verfasserin aut Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier Zhu, Lei oth Fan, Ying oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO 2020 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003750353 volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 35.18 Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie VZ AR 164 2017 15 1015 1068-1080 13 045F 690 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:164 year:2017 day:15 month:10 pages:1068-1080 extent:13 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Kolloidchemie Grenzflächenchemie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Cost-benefit analysis Cost-effectiveness analysis Mixed policy Abatement performance DEMETER-CCPE model Carbon tax |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Peng, Pan @@aut@@ Zhu, Lei @@oth@@ Fan, Ying @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
ELV015318435 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV015318435</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115010.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000030.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV015318435</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng, Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cost-benefit analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cost-effectiveness analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mixed policy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abatement performance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">DEMETER-CCPE model</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon tax</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Lei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fan, Ying</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:164</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1068-1080</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">164</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1015</subfield><subfield code="h">1068-1080</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Peng, Pan |
| spellingShingle |
Peng, Pan ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| authorStr |
Peng, Pan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings 330 - Economics 540 - Chemistry & allied sciences |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 ddc 330 ddc 540 bkl 35.18 Elsevier Cost-benefit analysis Elsevier Cost-effectiveness analysis Elsevier Mixed policy Elsevier Abatement performance Elsevier DEMETER-CCPE model Elsevier Carbon tax |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
l z lz y f yf |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003750353 |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction 330 - Economics 540 - Chemistry |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003750353 |
| title |
Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV015318435 (ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3 |
| title_full |
Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| author_sort |
Peng, Pan |
| journal |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| journalStr |
Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 300 - Social sciences 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1068 |
| author_browse |
Peng, Pan |
| container_volume |
164 |
| physical |
13 |
| class |
690 330 690 DE-600 330 DE-600 540 VZ 35.18 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Peng, Pan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |
| dewey-full |
690 330 540 |
| title_sort |
performance evaluation of climate policies in china: a study based on an integrated assessment model |
| title_auth |
Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| abstract |
China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. |
| abstractGer |
China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Zhu, Lei Fan, Ying |
| author2Str |
Zhu, Lei Fan, Ying |
| ppnlink |
ELV003750353 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:23:42.796Z |
| _version_ |
1803851265785987072 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV015318435</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115010.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000030.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV015318435</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0959-6526(17)31437-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">540</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Peng, Pan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Performance evaluation of climate policies in China: A study based on an integrated assessment model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China has the world’s highest levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and its adoption of optimal measures to address climate change is extremely important. In this article, we assess the performance of various Chinese policies aimed at addressing climate change in terms of cost effectiveness, cost-benefit efficiency, and their contribution to a reduction in emissions with a new single-region model, DEMETER-CCPE. Our analysis shows that the performance of these Chinese policies strongly depends on the principles and indicators used in the evaluation. When climate-specific cost indicators are considered, the mixed policy performs best in terms of cost reduction. When cost-efficiency indicators are used, a single policy performs better to some extent. From the perspective of evaluating the contribution to emissions reduction, the development of non-fossil-fuel-based energy technologies offers the greatest opportunity for reducing emissions in a mixed-policy scenario. Finally, this article study possible ‘burden’ and ‘free-rider’ scenarios in order to explore the effect of different levels of joint actions between China and the rest of the world (ROW) on a performance evaluation of policies to address climate change.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cost-benefit analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cost-effectiveness analysis</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mixed policy</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abatement performance</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">DEMETER-CCPE model</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon tax</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhu, Lei</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fan, Ying</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Rajendiran, Rajmohan ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Self-assembled 3D hierarchical MnCO</subfield><subfield code="d">2020</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003750353</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:164</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1068-1080</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.016</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">35.18</subfield><subfield code="j">Kolloidchemie</subfield><subfield code="j">Grenzflächenchemie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">164</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">1015</subfield><subfield code="h">1068-1080</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3992968 |