Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention
Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyze...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tröbs, Monique [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems - Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER, 2017, official journal of the American College of Cardiology, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:120 ; year:2017 ; number:9 ; day:1 ; month:11 ; pages:1508-1513 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV01539929X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV01539929X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625115128.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2017019000019.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV01539929X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 510 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 31.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tröbs, Monique |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. | ||
| 520 | |a Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Achenbach, Stephan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Plank, Pia Maria |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marwan, Mohamed |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Röther, Jens |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Klinghammer, Lutz |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Blachutzik, Florian |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schlundt, Christian |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER |t PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |d 2017 |d official journal of the American College of Cardiology |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:120 |g year:2017 |g number:9 |g day:1 |g month:11 |g pages:1508-1513 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-MAT | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 31.80 |j Angewandte Mathematik |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 120 |j 2017 |e 9 |b 1 |c 1101 |h 1508-1513 |g 6 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
m t mt |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
trbsmoniqueachenbachstephanplankpiamaria:2017----:rdcosfehiafiuenrnrdacrnrago |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
31.80 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 doi GBVA2017019000019.pica (DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Tröbs, Monique verfasserin aut Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention 2017transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Achenbach, Stephan oth Plank, Pia Maria oth Marwan, Mohamed oth Röther, Jens oth Klinghammer, Lutz oth Blachutzik, Florian oth Schlundt, Christian oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 120 2017 9 1 1101 1508-1513 6 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 doi GBVA2017019000019.pica (DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Tröbs, Monique verfasserin aut Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention 2017transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Achenbach, Stephan oth Plank, Pia Maria oth Marwan, Mohamed oth Röther, Jens oth Klinghammer, Lutz oth Blachutzik, Florian oth Schlundt, Christian oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 120 2017 9 1 1101 1508-1513 6 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 doi GBVA2017019000019.pica (DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Tröbs, Monique verfasserin aut Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention 2017transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Achenbach, Stephan oth Plank, Pia Maria oth Marwan, Mohamed oth Röther, Jens oth Klinghammer, Lutz oth Blachutzik, Florian oth Schlundt, Christian oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 120 2017 9 1 1101 1508-1513 6 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 doi GBVA2017019000019.pica (DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Tröbs, Monique verfasserin aut Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention 2017transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Achenbach, Stephan oth Plank, Pia Maria oth Marwan, Mohamed oth Röther, Jens oth Klinghammer, Lutz oth Blachutzik, Florian oth Schlundt, Christian oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 120 2017 9 1 1101 1508-1513 6 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 doi GBVA2017019000019.pica (DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Tröbs, Monique verfasserin aut Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention 2017transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. Achenbach, Stephan oth Plank, Pia Maria oth Marwan, Mohamed oth Röther, Jens oth Klinghammer, Lutz oth Blachutzik, Florian oth Schlundt, Christian oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 120 2017 9 1 1101 1508-1513 6 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:120 year:2017 number:9 day:1 month:11 pages:1508-1513 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Angewandte Mathematik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tröbs, Monique @@aut@@ Achenbach, Stephan @@oth@@ Plank, Pia Maria @@oth@@ Marwan, Mohamed @@oth@@ Röther, Jens @@oth@@ Klinghammer, Lutz @@oth@@ Blachutzik, Florian @@oth@@ Schlundt, Christian @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000623679 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV01539929X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV01539929X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115128.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017019000019.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV01539929X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tröbs, Monique</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Achenbach, Stephan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plank, Pia Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marwan, Mohamed</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Röther, Jens</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klinghammer, Lutz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blachutzik, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schlundt, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American College of Cardiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000623679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:120</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1508-1513</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">120</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1101</subfield><subfield code="h">1508-1513</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tröbs, Monique |
| spellingShingle |
Tröbs, Monique ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| authorStr |
Tröbs, Monique |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 510 - Mathematics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s a sa p m p pm pmp m m mm j r jr l k lk f b fb c s cs |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000623679 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 510 - Mathematics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| title |
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV01539929X (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5 |
| title_full |
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| author_sort |
Tröbs, Monique |
| journal |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| journalStr |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1508 |
| author_browse |
Tröbs, Monique |
| container_volume |
120 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tröbs, Monique |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |
| dewey-full |
610 510 |
| title_sort |
predictors of technical failure in transradial coronary angiography and intervention |
| title_auth |
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| abstract |
Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. |
| abstractGer |
Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT |
| container_issue |
9 |
| title_short |
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Achenbach, Stephan Plank, Pia Maria Marwan, Mohamed Röther, Jens Klinghammer, Lutz Blachutzik, Florian Schlundt, Christian |
| author2Str |
Achenbach, Stephan Plank, Pia Maria Marwan, Mohamed Röther, Jens Klinghammer, Lutz Blachutzik, Florian Schlundt, Christian |
| ppnlink |
ELV000623679 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:36:36.713Z |
| _version_ |
1803852077297827840 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV01539929X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625115128.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017019000019.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV01539929X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(17)31222-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tröbs, Monique</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention is preferred over the femoral approach but can be technically challenging. Identification of predictors of transradial access failure is important, especially in the context of acute coronary syndromes. We therefore retrospectively analyzed 13,095 consecutive patients (66 ± 12 years, 64% male) in whom transradial access was attempted for coronary angiography or intervention to identify predictors of transradial access failure. Angiograms and patient files were systematically reviewed to analyze patient characteristics associated with failure. Transradial access failure rate was 6.8% (909 of 13,095). Patients with transradial access failure were more frequently female (9.5% vs 5.5%; p <0.001), significantly older (68 ± 12 vs 66 ± 12 years, p <0.001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 ± 0.21 vs 1.94 ± 0.2 m2; p <0.001). Transradial failure was not significantly more frequent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus other patients (8.1% vs 6.9%, p = 0.195). After multivariable adjustment, only female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, p <0.001), higher patient age (OR 1.01/year, p = 0.002), and lower height (OR 0.98/cm, p = 0.004) independently predicted transradial access failure. In conclusion, female sex, higher age, and smaller height independently predict transradial access failure in coronary angiography and intervention. Failure rate in ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not significantly increased.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Achenbach, Stephan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Plank, Pia Maria</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marwan, Mohamed</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Röther, Jens</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klinghammer, Lutz</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Blachutzik, Florian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schlundt, Christian</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American College of Cardiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000623679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:120</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:9</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:11</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1508-1513</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">120</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">9</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1101</subfield><subfield code="h">1508-1513</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399294 |