Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters
In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Becker, B. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
---|
Umfang: |
3 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials - Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER, 2018, a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics, Orlando, Fla |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:118 ; year:2014 ; pages:381-383 ; extent:3 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV017173175 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV017173175 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625121741.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180602s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014001000006.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV017173175 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 530 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
084 | |a 52.12 |2 bkl | ||
100 | 1 | |a Becker, B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 3 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. | ||
520 | |a In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Capote, R. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kopecky, S. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Massimi, C. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Schillebeeckx, P. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sirakov, I. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Volev, K. |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Academic Press |a Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER |t Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |d 2018 |d a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics |g Orlando, Fla |w (DE-627)ELV000001120 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:118 |g year:2014 |g pages:381-383 |g extent:3 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
936 | b | k | |a 52.12 |j Tribologie |q VZ |
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 118 |j 2014 |h 381-383 |g 3 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 530 |
author_variant |
b b bb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
beckerbcapoterkopeckysmassimicschillebee:2014----:vlainfhcvracmtioetmtde |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
bklnumber |
52.12 |
publishDate |
2014 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 doi GBVA2014001000006.pica (DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Becker, B. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters 2014transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. Capote, R. oth Kopecky, S. oth Massimi, C. oth Schillebeeckx, P. oth Sirakov, I. oth Volev, K. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials 2018 a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000001120 volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.12 Tribologie VZ AR 118 2014 381-383 3 045F 530 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 doi GBVA2014001000006.pica (DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Becker, B. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters 2014transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. Capote, R. oth Kopecky, S. oth Massimi, C. oth Schillebeeckx, P. oth Sirakov, I. oth Volev, K. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials 2018 a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000001120 volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.12 Tribologie VZ AR 118 2014 381-383 3 045F 530 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 doi GBVA2014001000006.pica (DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Becker, B. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters 2014transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. Capote, R. oth Kopecky, S. oth Massimi, C. oth Schillebeeckx, P. oth Sirakov, I. oth Volev, K. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials 2018 a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000001120 volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.12 Tribologie VZ AR 118 2014 381-383 3 045F 530 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 doi GBVA2014001000006.pica (DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Becker, B. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters 2014transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. Capote, R. oth Kopecky, S. oth Massimi, C. oth Schillebeeckx, P. oth Sirakov, I. oth Volev, K. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials 2018 a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000001120 volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.12 Tribologie VZ AR 118 2014 381-383 3 045F 530 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 doi GBVA2014001000006.pica (DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Becker, B. verfasserin aut Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters 2014transfer abstract 3 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. Capote, R. oth Kopecky, S. oth Massimi, C. oth Schillebeeckx, P. oth Sirakov, I. oth Volev, K. oth Enthalten in Academic Press Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials 2018 a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV000001120 volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.12 Tribologie VZ AR 118 2014 381-383 3 045F 530 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials Orlando, Fla volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials Orlando, Fla volume:118 year:2014 pages:381-383 extent:3 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
bklname |
Tribologie |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
dewey-raw |
530 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Becker, B. @@aut@@ Capote, R. @@oth@@ Kopecky, S. @@oth@@ Massimi, C. @@oth@@ Schillebeeckx, P. @@oth@@ Sirakov, I. @@oth@@ Volev, K. @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000001120 |
dewey-sort |
3530 |
id |
ELV017173175 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV017173175</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625121741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014001000006.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV017173175</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Becker, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Capote, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kopecky, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Massimi, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schillebeeckx, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sirakov, I.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Volev, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000001120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:118</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:381-383</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Tribologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">118</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">381-383</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Becker, B. |
spellingShingle |
Becker, B. ddc 530 ddc 670 bkl 52.12 Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
authorStr |
Becker, B. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000001120 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
530 - Physics 670 - Manufacturing |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
topic |
ddc 530 ddc 670 bkl 52.12 |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 530 ddc 670 bkl 52.12 |
topic_browse |
ddc 530 ddc 670 bkl 52.12 |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
r c rc s k sk c m cm p s ps i s is k v kv |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000001120 |
dewey-tens |
530 - Physics 670 - Manufacturing |
hierarchy_top_title |
Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000001120 |
title |
Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV017173175 (ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1 |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
author_sort |
Becker, B. |
journal |
Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |
journalStr |
Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2014 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
381 |
author_browse |
Becker, B. |
container_volume |
118 |
physical |
3 |
class |
530 530 DE-600 670 VZ 52.12 bkl |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Becker, B. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |
dewey-full |
530 670 |
title_sort |
evaluation of the covariance matrix of estimated resonance parameters |
title_auth |
Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
abstract |
In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. |
abstractGer |
In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Capote, R. Kopecky, S. Massimi, C. Schillebeeckx, P. Sirakov, I. Volev, K. |
author2Str |
Capote, R. Kopecky, S. Massimi, C. Schillebeeckx, P. Sirakov, I. Volev, K. |
ppnlink |
ELV000001120 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T21:18:17.719Z |
_version_ |
1803866024412446720 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV017173175</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625121741.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180602s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014001000006.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV017173175</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0090-3752(14)00116-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.12</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Becker, B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the Covariance Matrix of Estimated Resonance Parameters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the resonance region nuclear resonance parameters are mostly obtained by a least square adjustment of a model to experimental data. Derived parameters can be mutually correlated through the adjustment procedure as well as through common experimental or model uncertainties. In this contribution we investigate four different methods to propagate the additional covariance caused by experimental or model uncertainties into the evaluation of the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters: (1) including the additional covariance into the experimental covariance matrix based on calculated or theoretical estimates of the data; (2) including the uncertainty affected parameter in the adjustment procedure; (3) evaluation of the full covariance matrix by Monte Carlo sampling of the common parameter; and (4) retroactively including the additional covariance by using the marginalization procedure of Habert et al.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Capote, R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kopecky, S.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Massimi, C.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schillebeeckx, P.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sirakov, I.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Volev, K.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Khafidh, M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Understanding the occurrence of a wavy wear track on elastomeric materials</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal devoted to compilations and evaluations of experimental and theoretical results in nuclear physics</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000001120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:118</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:381-383</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.086</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.12</subfield><subfield code="j">Tribologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">118</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">381-383</subfield><subfield code="g">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">530</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4020243 |