Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities
With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system an...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hartl, Barbara [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals - Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER, 2022, JBR, New York, NY |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:69 ; year:2016 ; number:8 ; pages:2756-2763 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV019093179 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV019093179 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625125258.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016004000013.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV019093179 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 650 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 650 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 51.00 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hartl, Barbara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. | ||
| 520 | |a With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hofmann, Eva |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kirchler, Erich |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER |t RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |d 2022 |d JBR |g New York, NY |w (DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2016 |g number:8 |g pages:2756-2763 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 51.00 |j Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 69 |j 2016 |e 8 |h 2756-2763 |g 8 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 650 | ||
| author_variant |
b h bh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
hartlbarbarahofmannevakirchlererich:2016----:oeeduefrhtmniyusoennenolbrtv |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
51.00 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 doi GBVA2016004000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Hartl, Barbara verfasserin aut Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. Hofmann, Eva oth Kirchler, Erich oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 69 2016 8 2756-2763 8 045F 650 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 doi GBVA2016004000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Hartl, Barbara verfasserin aut Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. Hofmann, Eva oth Kirchler, Erich oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 69 2016 8 2756-2763 8 045F 650 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 doi GBVA2016004000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Hartl, Barbara verfasserin aut Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. Hofmann, Eva oth Kirchler, Erich oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 69 2016 8 2756-2763 8 045F 650 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 doi GBVA2016004000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Hartl, Barbara verfasserin aut Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. Hofmann, Eva oth Kirchler, Erich oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 69 2016 8 2756-2763 8 045F 650 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 doi GBVA2016004000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Hartl, Barbara verfasserin aut Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. Hofmann, Eva oth Kirchler, Erich oth Enthalten in Elsevier Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals 2022 JBR New York, NY (DE-627)ELV008600120 volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 51.00 Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines VZ AR 69 2016 8 2756-2763 8 045F 650 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals New York, NY volume:69 year:2016 number:8 pages:2756-2763 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
650 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hartl, Barbara @@aut@@ Hofmann, Eva @@oth@@ Kirchler, Erich @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-sort |
3650 |
| id |
ELV019093179 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019093179</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625125258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016004000013.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019093179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hartl, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hofmann, Eva</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kirchler, Erich</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:69</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2756-2763</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">69</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">2756-2763</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hartl, Barbara |
| spellingShingle |
Hartl, Barbara ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| authorStr |
Hartl, Barbara |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
650 - Management & auxiliary services 670 - Manufacturing |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| topic |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 650 ddc 670 bkl 51.00 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
e h eh e k ek |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV008600120 |
| dewey-tens |
650 - Management & public relations 670 - Manufacturing |
| hierarchy_top_title |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV008600120 |
| title |
Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV019093179 (ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0 |
| title_full |
Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| author_sort |
Hartl, Barbara |
| journal |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| journalStr |
RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
2756 |
| author_browse |
Hartl, Barbara |
| container_volume |
69 |
| physical |
8 |
| class |
650 650 DE-600 670 VZ 51.00 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hartl, Barbara |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |
| dewey-full |
650 670 |
| title_sort |
do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| title_auth |
Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| abstract |
With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. |
| abstractGer |
With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| container_issue |
8 |
| title_short |
Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Hofmann, Eva Kirchler, Erich |
| author2Str |
Hofmann, Eva Kirchler, Erich |
| ppnlink |
ELV008600120 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T20:32:42.290Z |
| _version_ |
1803863156106199040 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019093179</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625125258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016004000013.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019093179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0148-2963(15)00605-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">650</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hartl, Barbara</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do we need rules for “what's mine is yours”? Governance in collaborative consumption communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With collaborative consumption, people are provided with access to a good rather than owning it. The current study addresses the problem of regulation in collaborative consumption communities, investigating whether governance increases cooperation, if and why consumers support a governance system and whether supporters and non-supporters differ in their distrust in others. To address these questions, an experiment (within-subject design) was conducted. After reading vignettes, participants indicated how likely they would cooperate and whether they support governance or not—giving reasons for their evaluation. The majority of participants support governance and governance increases cooperation. Supporters argue that humans are egoistic, whereas non-supporters are concerned about negative consequences, asking for alternative incentives. Supporters of governance also differ from non-supporters according to their trust in others. The current study allows valuable recommendation, as more and more sharing networks are created, facing the problem of whether to regulate access or not.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hofmann, Eva</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kirchler, Erich</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Xie, Hongxian ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">RETRACTED: Shuffling pathway of anti-twinning in body-centered-cubic metals</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">JBR</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV008600120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:69</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:2756-2763</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.11.011</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">51.00</subfield><subfield code="j">Werkstoffkunde: Allgemeines</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">69</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">8</subfield><subfield code="h">2756-2763</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">650</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398512 |