Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey
The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for cons...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma - Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER, 2022, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:67 ; year:2016 ; pages:127-134 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV019620535 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV019620535 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625130335.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016016000026.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV019620535 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Juan-Borrás, Marisol |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. | ||
| 520 | |a The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Honey |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hazard index |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a MRL |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Pesticides |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mixture-risk-assessment |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Domenech, Eva |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Escriche, Isabel |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER |t Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |d 2022 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:2016 |g pages:127-134 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 67 |j 2016 |h 127-134 |g 8 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 630 | ||
| author_variant |
m j b mjb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
juanborrsmarisoldomenechevaescricheisabe:2016----:itrrsassmnopsiieeiusne |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 doi GBVA2016016000026.pica (DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Juan-Borrás, Marisol verfasserin aut Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier Domenech, Eva oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 67 2016 127-134 8 045F 630 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 doi GBVA2016016000026.pica (DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Juan-Borrás, Marisol verfasserin aut Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier Domenech, Eva oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 67 2016 127-134 8 045F 630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 doi GBVA2016016000026.pica (DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Juan-Borrás, Marisol verfasserin aut Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier Domenech, Eva oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 67 2016 127-134 8 045F 630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 doi GBVA2016016000026.pica (DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Juan-Borrás, Marisol verfasserin aut Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier Domenech, Eva oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 67 2016 127-134 8 045F 630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 doi GBVA2016016000026.pica (DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Juan-Borrás, Marisol verfasserin aut Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey 2016transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier Domenech, Eva oth Escriche, Isabel oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 67 2016 127-134 8 045F 630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:67 year:2016 pages:127-134 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Honey Hazard index MRL Pesticides Mixture-risk-assessment |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol @@aut@@ Domenech, Eva @@oth@@ Escriche, Isabel @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV019620535 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019620535</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625130335.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016016000026.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019620535</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juan-Borrás, Marisol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Honey</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hazard index</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MRL</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mixture-risk-assessment</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Domenech, Eva</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escriche, Isabel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:127-134</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">127-134</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol |
| spellingShingle |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| authorStr |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Honey Elsevier Hazard index Elsevier MRL Elsevier Pesticides Elsevier Mixture-risk-assessment |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
e d ed i e ie |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| title |
Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV019620535 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4 |
| title_full |
Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| author_sort |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol |
| journal |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| journalStr |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
127 |
| author_browse |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol |
| container_volume |
67 |
| physical |
8 |
| class |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Juan-Borrás, Marisol |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 610 |
| title_sort |
mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| title_auth |
Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| abstract |
The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. |
| abstractGer |
The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Domenech, Eva Escriche, Isabel |
| author2Str |
Domenech, Eva Escriche, Isabel |
| ppnlink |
ELV009139680 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T21:55:40.223Z |
| _version_ |
1803868375848321024 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019620535</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625130335.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016016000026.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019620535</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(16)30097-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juan-Borrás, Marisol</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mixture-risk-assessment of pesticide residues in retail polyfloral honey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The presence of even tiny quantities of pesticide residues in honey, a traditional healthy product, is a matter of concern for producers, packers and consumers. This paper aims to quantify pesticides in retail brands of polyfloral honey, and to calculate the mixture risk assessment of honey for consumers according to the results obtained from the analysed samples. A LC-MS/MS multi-residue method was developed and validated for 13 compounds: 11 pesticides (chlorfenvinphos, coumaphos, tau-fluvalinate, amitraz, which are very common in veterinary treatments, and imidacloprid, acetamiprid, simazine, cyproconazole, tebuconazole, chlorpiryphos-methyl, chlorpiryphos, widely used in agricultural practices), and 2 metabolites of amitraz (2,4-DMA and 2,4-DMF). Results showed that the samples contained pesticide residues at different concentrations; however, the MRL in honey for each of the 11 pesticides was never exceeded. The most common were amitraz (from 1 to 50 μg/kg) present in 100% of the samples, and coumaphos (up to 14 μg/kg) in 63%. The hazard index (HI) for adults was less than 0.002 in all cases, a long way from 1, the value established as the limit of acceptability. Therefore, commercial honey does not represent any significant risk to health. However, considering that residue levels should be present “as low as reasonably achievable” it is deemed necessary to make an effort to reduce their presence by appropriate agricultural and, above all, beekeeping practices due to acaridae treatments.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Honey</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hazard index</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">MRL</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pesticides</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mixture-risk-assessment</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Domenech, Eva</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Escriche, Isabel</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:67</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:127-134</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.02.051</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">67</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="h">127-134</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4022274 |