Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women
Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Schoen, Martin W. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
6 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems - Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER, 2017, official journal of the American College of Cardiology, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:117 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; day:1 ; month:01 ; pages:48-53 ; extent:6 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV019756674 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV019756674 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625130604.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2016020000013.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV019756674 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 510 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 31.80 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Schoen, Martin W. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 6 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. | ||
| 520 | |a Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Tabak, Rachel G. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salas, Joanne |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scherrer, Jeffrey F. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buckhold, Fred R. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER |t PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |d 2017 |d official journal of the American College of Cardiology |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:117 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g day:1 |g month:01 |g pages:48-53 |g extent:6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-MAT | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 31.80 |j Angewandte Mathematik |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 117 |j 2016 |e 1 |b 1 |c 0101 |h 48-53 |g 6 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
m w s mw mws |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
schoenmartinwtabakrachelgsalasjoannesche:2016----:oprsnfdeectgieieaecoetrlramn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
31.80 |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 doi GBVA2016020000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Schoen, Martin W. verfasserin aut Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Tabak, Rachel G. oth Salas, Joanne oth Scherrer, Jeffrey F. oth Buckhold, Fred R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 117 2016 1 1 0101 48-53 6 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 doi GBVA2016020000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Schoen, Martin W. verfasserin aut Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Tabak, Rachel G. oth Salas, Joanne oth Scherrer, Jeffrey F. oth Buckhold, Fred R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 117 2016 1 1 0101 48-53 6 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 doi GBVA2016020000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Schoen, Martin W. verfasserin aut Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Tabak, Rachel G. oth Salas, Joanne oth Scherrer, Jeffrey F. oth Buckhold, Fred R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 117 2016 1 1 0101 48-53 6 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 doi GBVA2016020000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Schoen, Martin W. verfasserin aut Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Tabak, Rachel G. oth Salas, Joanne oth Scherrer, Jeffrey F. oth Buckhold, Fred R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 117 2016 1 1 0101 48-53 6 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 doi GBVA2016020000013.pica (DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Schoen, Martin W. verfasserin aut Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women 2016transfer abstract 6 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. Tabak, Rachel G. oth Salas, Joanne oth Scherrer, Jeffrey F. oth Buckhold, Fred R. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems 2017 official journal of the American College of Cardiology Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000623679 volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT 31.80 Angewandte Mathematik VZ AR 117 2016 1 1 0101 48-53 6 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:117 year:2016 number:1 day:1 month:01 pages:48-53 extent:6 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Angewandte Mathematik |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Schoen, Martin W. @@aut@@ Tabak, Rachel G. @@oth@@ Salas, Joanne @@oth@@ Scherrer, Jeffrey F. @@oth@@ Buckhold, Fred R. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000623679 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV019756674 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019756674</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625130604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000013.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019756674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schoen, Martin W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tabak, Rachel G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salas, Joanne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherrer, Jeffrey F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buckhold, Fred R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American College of Cardiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000623679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:117</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-53</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">117</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">48-53</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Schoen, Martin W. |
| spellingShingle |
Schoen, Martin W. ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| authorStr |
Schoen, Martin W. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 510 - Mathematics |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 510 bkl 31.80 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
r g t rg rgt j s js j f s jf jfs f r b fr frb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000623679 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 510 - Mathematics |
| hierarchy_top_title |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000623679 |
| title |
Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV019756674 (ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9 |
| title_full |
Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| author_sort |
Schoen, Martin W. |
| journal |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| journalStr |
PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
48 |
| author_browse |
Schoen, Martin W. |
| container_volume |
117 |
| physical |
6 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 510 VZ 31.80 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Schoen, Martin W. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |
| dewey-full |
610 510 |
| title_sort |
comparison of adherence to guideline-based cholesterol treatment goals in men versus women |
| title_auth |
Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| abstract |
Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. |
| abstractGer |
Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-MAT |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Tabak, Rachel G. Salas, Joanne Scherrer, Jeffrey F. Buckhold, Fred R. |
| author2Str |
Tabak, Rachel G. Salas, Joanne Scherrer, Jeffrey F. Buckhold, Fred R. |
| ppnlink |
ELV000623679 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:16:33.679Z |
| _version_ |
1803869690193248256 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019756674</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625130604.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2016020000013.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019756674</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0002-9149(15)02080-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">510</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schoen, Martin W.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studies show women do not receive aggressive cardiovascular interventions and may not be given guideline-based treatment to reduce cardiac events. We describe cholesterol treatment in an academic practice of family and internal medicine physicians to understand factors associated with achievement of guideline-based treatment goals in women compared with men. Primary care patients aged 40 to 75 years were included if they were prescribed a statin, had a Framingham risk score of ≥10%, had diabetes, or had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Patients were classified into Adult Treatment Panel III categories and assessed to whether they were in compliance with Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Odds ratios of goal adherence between women and men were calculated, and a multivariate model for goal achievement was created. In 2,747 patients, women were less likely to achieve cholesterol goals (odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70 to 0.95) despite having more prescriptions for statins (48% vs 39%, p <0.001). More women than men failed to reach low-density lipoprotein goals because they were not prescribed a statin (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85) and women on high-intensity statins were less likely than men to achieve goals (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.96). In all patients, diabetes was associated with nonattainment of cholesterol goals, but in high-risk women, the presence of diabetes improved goal achievement. In conclusion, women achieved guideline-based cholesterol recommendations at a lower rate than men, even when individual goals are considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tabak, Rachel G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Salas, Joanne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scherrer, Jeffrey F.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Buckhold, Fred R.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Zhang, Meng ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">PI simultaneous stabilization and set-point output regulation of Port-Hamiltonian systems</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American College of Cardiology</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000623679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:117</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:01</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:48-53</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-MAT</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">31.80</subfield><subfield code="j">Angewandte Mathematik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">117</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">0101</subfield><subfield code="h">48-53</subfield><subfield code="g">6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3992977 |