On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing
The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test....
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Budinski, Kenneth G. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
7 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Patterned mesoporous TiO - Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER, 2021, an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:376 ; year:2017 ; day:15 ; month:04 ; pages:1859-1865 ; extent:7 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV019959168 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV019959168 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230623152945.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000272A.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV019959168 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 670 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 670 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |a 620 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 52.56 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Budinski, Kenneth G. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 7 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Dry sand |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abrasion |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a ASTM G65 |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Two body |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Three body |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a ASTM G174 |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Budinski, Steven T. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER |t Patterned mesoporous TiO |d 2021 |d an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV006723276 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:376 |g year:2017 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:1859-1865 |g extent:7 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 52.56 |j Regenerative Energieformen |j alternative Energieformen |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 376 |j 2017 |b 15 |c 0415 |h 1859-1865 |g 7 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 670 | ||
| author_variant |
k g b kg kgb |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
budinskikennethgbudinskistevent:2017----:nelcntreoybainetnwttoo |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
52.56 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 doi GBV00000000000272A.pica (DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Budinski, Kenneth G. verfasserin aut On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing 2017 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier Budinski, Steven T. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER Patterned mesoporous TiO 2021 an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006723276 volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 376 2017 15 0415 1859-1865 7 045F 670 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 doi GBV00000000000272A.pica (DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Budinski, Kenneth G. verfasserin aut On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing 2017 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier Budinski, Steven T. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER Patterned mesoporous TiO 2021 an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006723276 volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 376 2017 15 0415 1859-1865 7 045F 670 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 doi GBV00000000000272A.pica (DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Budinski, Kenneth G. verfasserin aut On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing 2017 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier Budinski, Steven T. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER Patterned mesoporous TiO 2021 an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006723276 volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 376 2017 15 0415 1859-1865 7 045F 670 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 doi GBV00000000000272A.pica (DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Budinski, Kenneth G. verfasserin aut On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing 2017 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier Budinski, Steven T. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER Patterned mesoporous TiO 2021 an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006723276 volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 376 2017 15 0415 1859-1865 7 045F 670 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 doi GBV00000000000272A.pica (DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Budinski, Kenneth G. verfasserin aut On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing 2017 7 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier Budinski, Steven T. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER Patterned mesoporous TiO 2021 an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV006723276 volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 376 2017 15 0415 1859-1865 7 045F 670 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Patterned mesoporous TiO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Patterned mesoporous TiO Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:376 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1859-1865 extent:7 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Dry sand Abrasion ASTM G65 Two body Three body ASTM G174 |
| dewey-raw |
670 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Patterned mesoporous TiO |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Budinski, Kenneth G. @@aut@@ Budinski, Steven T. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV006723276 |
| dewey-sort |
3670 |
| id |
ELV019959168 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019959168</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623152945.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000272A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019959168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Budinski, Kenneth G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dry sand</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abrasion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ASTM G65</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Two body</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Three body</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ASTM G174</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Budinski, Steven T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Patterned mesoporous TiO</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006723276</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:376</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1859-1865</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="j">Regenerative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="j">alternative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">376</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0415</subfield><subfield code="h">1859-1865</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Budinski, Kenneth G. |
| spellingShingle |
Budinski, Kenneth G. ddc 670 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| authorStr |
Budinski, Kenneth G. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV006723276 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
670 - Manufacturing 530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 670 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 670 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 670 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Dry sand Elsevier Abrasion Elsevier ASTM G65 Elsevier Two body Elsevier Three body Elsevier ASTM G174 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
s t b st stb |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Patterned mesoporous TiO |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV006723276 |
| dewey-tens |
670 - Manufacturing 530 - Physics 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Patterned mesoporous TiO |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV006723276 |
| title |
On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV019959168 (ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1 |
| title_full |
On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| author_sort |
Budinski, Kenneth G. |
| journal |
Patterned mesoporous TiO |
| journalStr |
Patterned mesoporous TiO |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1859 |
| author_browse |
Budinski, Kenneth G. |
| container_volume |
376 |
| physical |
7 |
| class |
670 670 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Budinski, Kenneth G. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |
| dewey-full |
670 530 620 |
| title_sort |
on replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| title_auth |
On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| abstract |
The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. |
| abstractGer |
The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Budinski, Steven T. |
| author2Str |
Budinski, Steven T. |
| ppnlink |
ELV006723276 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:51:17.706Z |
| _version_ |
1803871875453943808 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019959168</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623152945.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000272A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019959168</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0043-1648(17)30009-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">670</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Budinski, Kenneth G.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">On replacing three-body abrasion testing with two-body abrasion testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test (ASTM G 65) is probably the most widely used abrasion test. It has been used for decades with favorable results. However, this test was developed when tool steels and fusion hardfacings were the materials usually ranked with this low-stress sand abrasion test. Two major problems have emerged in the use of this test: 1. The abradant (silica sand) is not aggressive enough for many modern materials. 2. There are many issues with the variability and availability of the rubbers used to force the abrasive against the test surface.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dry sand</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abrasion</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ASTM G65</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Two body</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Three body</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ASTM G174</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Budinski, Steven T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Nam, Le Vu ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Patterned mesoporous TiO</subfield><subfield code="d">2021</subfield><subfield code="d">an international journal on the science and technology of friction, lubrication and wear</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV006723276</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:376</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1859-1865</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.001</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="j">Regenerative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="j">alternative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">376</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0415</subfield><subfield code="h">1859-1865</subfield><subfield code="g">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">670</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4016075 |