Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges
• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact el...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Shi, Zhongqi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions - Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER, 2022, the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:148 ; year:2017 ; day:1 ; month:10 ; pages:541-551 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV019966733 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV019966733 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230623153004.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000374.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV019966733 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |a 600 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 85.15 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Shi, Zhongqi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Nonsmooth dynamics |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Compliance approach |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Concrete bridges |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Deck-abutment pounding |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Friction |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gap element |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER |t Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |d 2022 |d the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009490973 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:148 |g year:2017 |g day:1 |g month:10 |g pages:541-551 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 85.15 |j Forschung und Entwicklung |x Betriebswirtschaft |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 148 |j 2017 |b 1 |c 1001 |h 541-551 |g 11 | ||
| author_variant |
z s zs |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
shizhongqidimitrakopouloseliasg:2017----:oprtveautootoiuainprahsfekbt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| bklnumber |
85.15 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 doi GBV00000000000374.pica (DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Shi, Zhongqi verfasserin aut Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges 2017 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions 2022 the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009490973 volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 85.15 Forschung und Entwicklung Betriebswirtschaft VZ AR 148 2017 1 1001 541-551 11 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 doi GBV00000000000374.pica (DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Shi, Zhongqi verfasserin aut Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges 2017 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions 2022 the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009490973 volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 85.15 Forschung und Entwicklung Betriebswirtschaft VZ AR 148 2017 1 1001 541-551 11 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 doi GBV00000000000374.pica (DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Shi, Zhongqi verfasserin aut Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges 2017 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions 2022 the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009490973 volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 85.15 Forschung und Entwicklung Betriebswirtschaft VZ AR 148 2017 1 1001 541-551 11 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 doi GBV00000000000374.pica (DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Shi, Zhongqi verfasserin aut Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges 2017 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions 2022 the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009490973 volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 85.15 Forschung und Entwicklung Betriebswirtschaft VZ AR 148 2017 1 1001 541-551 11 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 doi GBV00000000000374.pica (DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Shi, Zhongqi verfasserin aut Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges 2017 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier • The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions 2022 the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009490973 volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 85.15 Forschung und Entwicklung Betriebswirtschaft VZ AR 148 2017 1 1001 541-551 11 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:148 year:2017 day:1 month:10 pages:541-551 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Forschung und Entwicklung |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Nonsmooth dynamics Compliance approach Concrete bridges Deck-abutment pounding Friction Gap element |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Shi, Zhongqi @@aut@@ Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009490973 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
ELV019966733 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019966733</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623153004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000374.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019966733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi, Zhongqi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nonsmooth dynamics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Compliance approach</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Concrete bridges</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deck-abutment pounding</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Friction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gap element</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009490973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:148</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:541-551</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Forschung und Entwicklung</subfield><subfield code="x">Betriebswirtschaft</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">148</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1001</subfield><subfield code="h">541-551</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Shi, Zhongqi |
| spellingShingle |
Shi, Zhongqi ddc 330 bkl 85.15 Elsevier Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| authorStr |
Shi, Zhongqi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009490973 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 600 - Technology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 330 bkl 85.15 Elsevier Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 bkl 85.15 Elsevier Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 bkl 85.15 Elsevier Nonsmooth dynamics Elsevier Compliance approach Elsevier Concrete bridges Elsevier Deck-abutment pounding Elsevier Friction Elsevier Gap element |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
e g d eg egd |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009490973 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 600 - Technology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009490973 |
| title |
Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV019966733 (ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3 |
| title_full |
Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| author_sort |
Shi, Zhongqi |
| journal |
Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |
| journalStr |
Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
541 |
| author_browse |
Shi, Zhongqi |
| container_volume |
148 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
330 600 VZ 85.15 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Shi, Zhongqi |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |
| dewey-full |
330 600 |
| title_sort |
comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| title_auth |
Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| abstract |
• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. |
| abstractGer |
• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. |
| author2Str |
Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G. |
| ppnlink |
ELV009490973 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:52:26.554Z |
| _version_ |
1803871947646304256 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV019966733</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230623153004.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000374.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV019966733</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0141-0296(17)30533-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="a">600</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">85.15</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi, Zhongqi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative evaluation of two simulation approaches of deck-abutment pounding in bridges</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">• The study compares compliance and nonsmooth simulations of deck-abutment pounding. • It sheds light on the influence of the contact stiffness on the simulation outcome. • It underlines the importance of friction on the pounding induced deck rotations. • It examines the effect of various contact elements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nonsmooth dynamics</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Compliance approach</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Concrete bridges</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deck-abutment pounding</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Friction</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gap element</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dimitrakopoulos, Elias G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Mariani, Marcello M. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Artificial intelligence in innovation research: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="d">the journal of earthquake, wind and ocean engineering</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009490973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:148</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:1</subfield><subfield code="g">month:10</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:541-551</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.077</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">85.15</subfield><subfield code="j">Forschung und Entwicklung</subfield><subfield code="x">Betriebswirtschaft</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">148</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">1</subfield><subfield code="c">1001</subfield><subfield code="h">541-551</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3980484 |