The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis
The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not elig...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hahn, Amy B. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
4 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology - Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER, 2015, official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI), Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:78 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:37-40 ; extent:4 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV020116284 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV020116284 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625131209.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2017007000008.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV020116284 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 610 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hahn, Amy B. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 4 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. | ||
| 520 | |a The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a KDPI |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a cPRA |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a UAs |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EPTS |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a UNOS |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a KAS |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a OPTN |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mackey, Maryanne |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Constantino, Don |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ata, Ashar |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chandolias, Nikolaos |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lopez-Soler, Reynold |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Conti, David J. |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER |t Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |d 2015 |d official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000456578 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:37-40 |g extent:4 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 78 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 37-40 |g 4 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 610 | ||
| author_variant |
a b h ab abh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
hahnamybmackeymaryanneconstantinodonataa:2017----:hnwinyloainytmosoeulydatgaleyihpaadd |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 doi GBVA2017007000008.pica (DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Hahn, Amy B. verfasserin aut The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis 2017transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier Mackey, Maryanne oth Constantino, Don oth Ata, Ashar oth Chandolias, Nikolaos oth Lopez-Soler, Reynold oth Conti, David J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology 2015 official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000456578 volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 78 2017 1 37-40 4 045F 610 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 doi GBVA2017007000008.pica (DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Hahn, Amy B. verfasserin aut The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis 2017transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier Mackey, Maryanne oth Constantino, Don oth Ata, Ashar oth Chandolias, Nikolaos oth Lopez-Soler, Reynold oth Conti, David J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology 2015 official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000456578 volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 78 2017 1 37-40 4 045F 610 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 doi GBVA2017007000008.pica (DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Hahn, Amy B. verfasserin aut The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis 2017transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier Mackey, Maryanne oth Constantino, Don oth Ata, Ashar oth Chandolias, Nikolaos oth Lopez-Soler, Reynold oth Conti, David J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology 2015 official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000456578 volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 78 2017 1 37-40 4 045F 610 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 doi GBVA2017007000008.pica (DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Hahn, Amy B. verfasserin aut The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis 2017transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier Mackey, Maryanne oth Constantino, Don oth Ata, Ashar oth Chandolias, Nikolaos oth Lopez-Soler, Reynold oth Conti, David J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology 2015 official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000456578 volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 78 2017 1 37-40 4 045F 610 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 doi GBVA2017007000008.pica (DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid Hahn, Amy B. verfasserin aut The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis 2017transfer abstract 4 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier Mackey, Maryanne oth Constantino, Don oth Ata, Ashar oth Chandolias, Nikolaos oth Lopez-Soler, Reynold oth Conti, David J. oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology 2015 official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000456578 volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA AR 78 2017 1 37-40 4 045F 610 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:78 year:2017 number:1 pages:37-40 extent:4 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
KDPI cPRA UAs EPTS UNOS KAS OPTN |
| dewey-raw |
610 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hahn, Amy B. @@aut@@ Mackey, Maryanne @@oth@@ Constantino, Don @@oth@@ Ata, Ashar @@oth@@ Chandolias, Nikolaos @@oth@@ Lopez-Soler, Reynold @@oth@@ Conti, David J. @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000456578 |
| dewey-sort |
3610 |
| id |
ELV020116284 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV020116284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625131209.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017007000008.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV020116284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hahn, Amy B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KDPI</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">cPRA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UAs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EPTS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UNOS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KAS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">OPTN</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mackey, Maryanne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constantino, Don</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ata, Ashar</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chandolias, Nikolaos</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lopez-Soler, Reynold</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Conti, David J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000456578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:78</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:37-40</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">78</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">37-40</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hahn, Amy B. |
| spellingShingle |
Hahn, Amy B. ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| authorStr |
Hahn, Amy B. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000456578 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN |
| topic_browse |
ddc 610 ddc 570 fid BIODIV Elsevier KDPI Elsevier cPRA Elsevier UAs Elsevier EPTS Elsevier UNOS Elsevier KAS Elsevier OPTN |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m m mm d c dc a a aa n c nc r l s rls d j c dj djc |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000456578 |
| dewey-tens |
610 - Medicine & health 570 - Life sciences; biology |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000456578 |
| title |
The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV020116284 (ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9 |
| title_full |
The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| author_sort |
Hahn, Amy B. |
| journal |
Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |
| journalStr |
Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
37 |
| author_browse |
Hahn, Amy B. |
| container_volume |
78 |
| physical |
4 |
| class |
610 610 DE-600 570 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hahn, Amy B. |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |
| dewey-full |
610 570 |
| title_sort |
new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cpra candidates – a single center analysis |
| title_auth |
The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| abstract |
The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. |
| abstractGer |
The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Mackey, Maryanne Constantino, Don Ata, Ashar Chandolias, Nikolaos Lopez-Soler, Reynold Conti, David J. |
| author2Str |
Mackey, Maryanne Constantino, Don Ata, Ashar Chandolias, Nikolaos Lopez-Soler, Reynold Conti, David J. |
| ppnlink |
ELV000456578 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T16:44:40.459Z |
| _version_ |
1803848809667624960 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV020116284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625131209.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2017007000008.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV020116284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0198-8859(16)30466-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hahn, Amy B.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The new kidney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates – A single center analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The new UNOS kidney allocation system awards very high points to candidates with cPRA 99% and 100%, and allows for national sharing for cPRA 100% candidates. We sought to determine the effect of this new kidney allocation system on candidates who are very highly sensitized (90–98% cPRA) but not eligible for very high points or national sharing by examining offers to these candidates for 5months pre-implementation and two consecutive 5month periods post-implementation and comparing them to cPRA⩾99% candidates. We found that the cPRA⩾99% candidates received significantly more offers and transplants after implementation, while offers and transplants to the 90–98% candidates decreased. A slight adjustment to the allocation system may be needed to provide more equitable distribution of kidneys to all high cPRA candidates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KDPI</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">cPRA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UAs</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EPTS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">UNOS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">KAS</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">OPTN</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mackey, Maryanne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constantino, Don</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ata, Ashar</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chandolias, Nikolaos</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lopez-Soler, Reynold</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Conti, David J.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Hoffman, Brenton D. ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Cadherin-Based Mechanobiology</subfield><subfield code="d">2015</subfield><subfield code="d">official journal of the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI)</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000456578</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:78</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:37-40</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2016.10.010</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">78</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">37-40</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3968735 |