How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study
Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an addit...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Sidarus, Nura [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
13 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements - Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER, 2017, a journal of brain function, Orlando, Fla |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:150 ; year:2017 ; day:15 ; month:04 ; pages:1-13 ; extent:13 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV020473540 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV020473540 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625131909.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV020473540 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sidarus, Nura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 13 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. | ||
| 520 | |a Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Action selection |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Evoked potentials |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Metacognition |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Cognitive control |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sense of agency |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Action monitoring |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vuorre, Matti |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haggard, Patrick |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Academic Press |a Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER |t Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |d 2017 |d a journal of brain function |g Orlando, Fla |w (DE-627)ELV001942808 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:150 |g year:2017 |g day:15 |g month:04 |g pages:1-13 |g extent:13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 150 |j 2017 |b 15 |c 0415 |h 1-13 |g 13 | ||
| author_variant |
n s ns |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
sidarusnuravuorremattihaggardpatrick:2017----:oatoslcinnlecshsnef |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica (DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sidarus, Nura verfasserin aut How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier Vuorre, Matti oth Haggard, Patrick oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 150 2017 15 0415 1-13 13 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica (DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sidarus, Nura verfasserin aut How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier Vuorre, Matti oth Haggard, Patrick oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 150 2017 15 0415 1-13 13 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica (DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sidarus, Nura verfasserin aut How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier Vuorre, Matti oth Haggard, Patrick oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 150 2017 15 0415 1-13 13 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica (DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sidarus, Nura verfasserin aut How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier Vuorre, Matti oth Haggard, Patrick oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 150 2017 15 0415 1-13 13 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 doi /cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica (DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Sidarus, Nura verfasserin aut How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study 2017transfer abstract 13 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier Vuorre, Matti oth Haggard, Patrick oth Enthalten in Academic Press Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements 2017 a journal of brain function Orlando, Fla (DE-627)ELV001942808 volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U AR 150 2017 15 0415 1-13 13 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements Orlando, Fla volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements Orlando, Fla volume:150 year:2017 day:15 month:04 pages:1-13 extent:13 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Action selection Evoked potentials Metacognition Cognitive control Sense of agency Action monitoring |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sidarus, Nura @@aut@@ Vuorre, Matti @@oth@@ Haggard, Patrick @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-15T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV001942808 |
| id |
ELV020473540 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV020473540</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625131909.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV020473540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sidarus, Nura</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Action selection</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evoked potentials</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metacognition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cognitive control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sense of agency</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Action monitoring</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vuorre, Matti</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haggard, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal of brain function</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001942808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:150</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">150</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0415</subfield><subfield code="h">1-13</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Sidarus, Nura |
| spellingShingle |
Sidarus, Nura Elsevier Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| authorStr |
Sidarus, Nura |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV001942808 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring Elsevier |
| topic |
Elsevier Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring |
| topic_unstemmed |
Elsevier Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring |
| topic_browse |
Elsevier Action selection Elsevier Evoked potentials Elsevier Metacognition Elsevier Cognitive control Elsevier Sense of agency Elsevier Action monitoring |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
m v mv p h ph |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV001942808 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV001942808 |
| title |
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV020473540 (ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0 |
| title_full |
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| author_sort |
Sidarus, Nura |
| journal |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
| journalStr |
Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1 |
| author_browse |
Sidarus, Nura |
| container_volume |
150 |
| physical |
13 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Sidarus, Nura |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |
| title_sort |
how action selection influences the sense of agency: an erp study |
| title_auth |
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| abstract |
Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. |
| abstractGer |
Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Vuorre, Matti Haggard, Patrick |
| author2Str |
Vuorre, Matti Haggard, Patrick |
| ppnlink |
ELV001942808 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:42:07.997Z |
| _version_ |
1803852424674279424 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV020473540</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625131909.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">/cbs_pica/cbs_olc/import_discovery/elsevier/einzuspielen/GBV00000000001249.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV020473540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1053-8119(17)30118-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sidarus, Nura</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How action selection influences the sense of agency: An ERP study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sense of agency (SoA) refers to the feeling that we are in control of our actions and, through them, of events in the outside world. One influential view claims that the SoA depends on retrospectively matching the expected and actual outcomes of action. However, recent studies have revealed an additional, prospective component to SoA, driven by action selection processes. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying prospective agency. Subliminal priming was used to manipulate the fluency of selecting a left or right hand action in response to a supraliminal target. These actions were followed by one of several coloured circles, after a variable delay. Participants then rated their degree of control over this visual outcome. Incompatible priming impaired action selection, and reduced sense of agency over action outcomes, relative to compatible priming. More negative ERPs immediately after the action, linked to post-decisional action monitoring, were associated with reduced agency ratings over action outcomes. Additionally, feedback-related negativity evoked by the outcome was also associated with reduced agency ratings. These ERP components may reflect brain processes underlying prospective and retrospective components of sense of agency respectively.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Action selection</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Evoked potentials</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Metacognition</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cognitive control</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sense of agency</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Action monitoring</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vuorre, Matti</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Haggard, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="a">Nicosia, Alessia ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Field study of a soft X-ray aerosol neutralizer combined with electrostatic classifiers for nanoparticle size distribution measurements</subfield><subfield code="d">2017</subfield><subfield code="d">a journal of brain function</subfield><subfield code="g">Orlando, Fla</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV001942808</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:150</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">day:15</subfield><subfield code="g">month:04</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1-13</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.015</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">150</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="b">15</subfield><subfield code="c">0415</subfield><subfield code="h">1-13</subfield><subfield code="g">13</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3982153 |