Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms
For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hilbeck, Angelika [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
15 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms - Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER, 2019, integrating monitoring, assessment and management, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:36 ; year:2014 ; pages:367-381 ; extent:15 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV022452265 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV022452265 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625135510.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014004000023.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV022452265 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 570 |a 630 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 150 |a 610 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a BIODIV |q DE-30 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a 77.50 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 44.90 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hilbeck, Angelika |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 15 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. | ||
| 520 | |a For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a EU |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EF |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a PAT |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a ERA |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a IOBC |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a GM |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a GMO |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a NTO |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a IR |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a HR |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EFSA |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weiss, Gabriele |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oehen, Bernadette |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Römbke, Jörg |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jänsch, Stephan |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Teichmann, Hanka |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lang, Andreas |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Otto, Mathias |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tappeser, Beatrix |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER |t The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |d 2019 |d integrating monitoring, assessment and management |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003175588 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:36 |g year:2014 |g pages:367-381 |g extent:15 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a FID-BIODIV | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 77.50 |j Psychophysiologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 44.90 |j Neurologie |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 36 |j 2014 |h 367-381 |g 15 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 570 | ||
| author_variant |
a h ah |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
hilbeckangelikaweissgabrieleoehenbernade:2014----:aknmtieaoeainlolfrhevrnetliksesetfeeialmdf |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
77.50 44.90 |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 doi GBVA2014004000023.pica (DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Hilbeck, Angelika verfasserin aut Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier Weiss, Gabriele oth Oehen, Bernadette oth Römbke, Jörg oth Jänsch, Stephan oth Teichmann, Hanka oth Lang, Andreas oth Otto, Mathias oth Tappeser, Beatrix oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms 2019 integrating monitoring, assessment and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003175588 volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 36 2014 367-381 15 045F 570 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 doi GBVA2014004000023.pica (DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Hilbeck, Angelika verfasserin aut Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier Weiss, Gabriele oth Oehen, Bernadette oth Römbke, Jörg oth Jänsch, Stephan oth Teichmann, Hanka oth Lang, Andreas oth Otto, Mathias oth Tappeser, Beatrix oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms 2019 integrating monitoring, assessment and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003175588 volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 36 2014 367-381 15 045F 570 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 doi GBVA2014004000023.pica (DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Hilbeck, Angelika verfasserin aut Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier Weiss, Gabriele oth Oehen, Bernadette oth Römbke, Jörg oth Jänsch, Stephan oth Teichmann, Hanka oth Lang, Andreas oth Otto, Mathias oth Tappeser, Beatrix oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms 2019 integrating monitoring, assessment and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003175588 volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 36 2014 367-381 15 045F 570 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 doi GBVA2014004000023.pica (DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Hilbeck, Angelika verfasserin aut Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier Weiss, Gabriele oth Oehen, Bernadette oth Römbke, Jörg oth Jänsch, Stephan oth Teichmann, Hanka oth Lang, Andreas oth Otto, Mathias oth Tappeser, Beatrix oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms 2019 integrating monitoring, assessment and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003175588 volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 36 2014 367-381 15 045F 570 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 doi GBVA2014004000023.pica (DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Hilbeck, Angelika verfasserin aut Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms 2014transfer abstract 15 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier Weiss, Gabriele oth Oehen, Bernadette oth Römbke, Jörg oth Jänsch, Stephan oth Teichmann, Hanka oth Lang, Andreas oth Otto, Mathias oth Tappeser, Beatrix oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms 2019 integrating monitoring, assessment and management Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003175588 volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA 77.50 Psychophysiologie VZ 44.90 Neurologie VZ AR 36 2014 367-381 15 045F 570 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:36 year:2014 pages:367-381 extent:15 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Psychophysiologie Neurologie |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
EU EF PAT ERA IOBC GM GMO NTO IR HR EFSA |
| dewey-raw |
570 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hilbeck, Angelika @@aut@@ Weiss, Gabriele @@oth@@ Oehen, Bernadette @@oth@@ Römbke, Jörg @@oth@@ Jänsch, Stephan @@oth@@ Teichmann, Hanka @@oth@@ Lang, Andreas @@oth@@ Otto, Mathias @@oth@@ Tappeser, Beatrix @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003175588 |
| dewey-sort |
3570 |
| id |
ELV022452265 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV022452265</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625135510.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014004000023.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV022452265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hilbeck, Angelika</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EU</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EF</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PAT</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ERA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IOBC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">GM</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">GMO</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NTO</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IR</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HR</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EFSA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weiss, Gabriele</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oehen, Bernadette</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Römbke, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jänsch, Stephan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teichmann, Hanka</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Otto, Mathias</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tappeser, Beatrix</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">integrating monitoring, assessment and management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003175588</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:367-381</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">367-381</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Hilbeck, Angelika |
| spellingShingle |
Hilbeck, Angelika ddc 570 ddc 630 ddc 150 fid BIODIV bkl 77.50 bkl 44.90 Elsevier EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| authorStr |
Hilbeck, Angelika |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003175588 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture & related technologies 150 - Psychology 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 570 ddc 630 ddc 150 fid BIODIV bkl 77.50 bkl 44.90 Elsevier EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 570 ddc 630 ddc 150 fid BIODIV bkl 77.50 bkl 44.90 Elsevier EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA |
| topic_browse |
ddc 570 ddc 630 ddc 150 fid BIODIV bkl 77.50 bkl 44.90 Elsevier EU Elsevier EF Elsevier PAT Elsevier ERA Elsevier IOBC Elsevier GM Elsevier GMO Elsevier NTO Elsevier IR Elsevier HR Elsevier EFSA |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
g w gw b o bo j r jr s j sj h t ht a l al m o mo b t bt |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003175588 |
| dewey-tens |
570 - Life sciences; biology 630 - Agriculture 150 - Psychology 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003175588 |
| title |
Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV022452265 (ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1 |
| title_full |
Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| author_sort |
Hilbeck, Angelika |
| journal |
The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |
| journalStr |
The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
500 - Science 600 - Technology 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
367 |
| author_browse |
Hilbeck, Angelika |
| container_volume |
36 |
| physical |
15 |
| class |
570 630 570 DE-600 630 DE-600 150 610 VZ BIODIV DE-30 fid 77.50 bkl 44.90 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hilbeck, Angelika |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |
| dewey-full |
570 630 150 610 |
| title_sort |
ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| title_auth |
Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| abstract |
For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. |
| abstractGer |
For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U FID-BIODIV SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Weiss, Gabriele Oehen, Bernadette Römbke, Jörg Jänsch, Stephan Teichmann, Hanka Lang, Andreas Otto, Mathias Tappeser, Beatrix |
| author2Str |
Weiss, Gabriele Oehen, Bernadette Römbke, Jörg Jänsch, Stephan Teichmann, Hanka Lang, Andreas Otto, Mathias Tappeser, Beatrix |
| ppnlink |
ELV003175588 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T22:01:31.904Z |
| _version_ |
1803868744613625856 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV022452265</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625135510.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014004000023.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV022452265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S1470-160X(13)00278-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">150</subfield><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BIODIV</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-30</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hilbeck, Angelika</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ranking matrices as operational tools for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops on non-target organisms</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For the operationalization of the structured, stepwise selection procedure for non-target testing organisms integrated into the new EFSA guidelines for environmental risk assessment of GM plants practical tools – i.e. ranking matrices – were developed. These tools – some of them are new and some are refined from older ones – were tested using the GM case crop of TC 1507 maize. The selection procedure consists of six steps. The strategy builds on identifying the important ecological functions for the particular cropping system and compiling a species lists according to their ecological functions and presence in the specific receiving environments. Subsequently, the species numbers are reduced in a systematic, stepwise fashion to a relevant and practical number of testing organisms and/or processes.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EU</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EF</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">PAT</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">ERA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IOBC</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">GM</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">GMO</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NTO</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">IR</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">HR</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">EFSA</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weiss, Gabriele</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oehen, Bernadette</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Römbke, Jörg</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jänsch, Stephan</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teichmann, Hanka</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lang, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Otto, Mathias</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tappeser, Beatrix</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Keyan, Dharani ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">The capacity for acute exercise to modulate emotional memories: A review of findings and mechanisms</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">integrating monitoring, assessment and management</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003175588</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:36</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:367-381</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.016</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">FID-BIODIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">77.50</subfield><subfield code="j">Psychophysiologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">44.90</subfield><subfield code="j">Neurologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">36</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">367-381</subfield><subfield code="g">15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">570</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398529 |