Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems
The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Sta...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Miceli, Alessandro [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
8 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma - Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER, 2022, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:40 ; year:2014 ; pages:157-164 ; extent:8 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV022888136 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV022888136 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625140258.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2014016000018.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV022888136 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 630 |a 640 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 630 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 640 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
| 100 | 1 | |a Miceli, Alessandro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 8 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... | ||
| 520 | |a The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Food model systems |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Indian mustard |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aqueous extracts |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Antibacterial activity |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a In situ activity |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Borage |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Aleo, Aurora |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Corona, Onofrio |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sardina, Maria T. |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mammina, Caterina |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Settanni, Luca |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER |t Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |d 2022 |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2014 |g pages:157-164 |g extent:8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 40 |j 2014 |h 157-164 |g 8 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 630 | ||
| author_variant |
a m am |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
micelialessandroaleoauroracoronaonofrios:2014----:niatraatvtobrgofcnlsnbascjneauosxrcsvlaeivtoni |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014transfer abstract |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 doi GBVA2014016000018.pica (DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Miceli, Alessandro verfasserin aut Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems 2014transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier Aleo, Aurora oth Corona, Onofrio oth Sardina, Maria T. oth Mammina, Caterina oth Settanni, Luca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 40 2014 157-164 8 045F 630 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 doi GBVA2014016000018.pica (DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Miceli, Alessandro verfasserin aut Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems 2014transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier Aleo, Aurora oth Corona, Onofrio oth Sardina, Maria T. oth Mammina, Caterina oth Settanni, Luca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 40 2014 157-164 8 045F 630 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 doi GBVA2014016000018.pica (DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Miceli, Alessandro verfasserin aut Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems 2014transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier Aleo, Aurora oth Corona, Onofrio oth Sardina, Maria T. oth Mammina, Caterina oth Settanni, Luca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 40 2014 157-164 8 045F 630 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 doi GBVA2014016000018.pica (DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Miceli, Alessandro verfasserin aut Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems 2014transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier Aleo, Aurora oth Corona, Onofrio oth Sardina, Maria T. oth Mammina, Caterina oth Settanni, Luca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 40 2014 157-164 8 045F 630 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 doi GBVA2014016000018.pica (DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Miceli, Alessandro verfasserin aut Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems 2014transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier Aleo, Aurora oth Corona, Onofrio oth Sardina, Maria T. oth Mammina, Caterina oth Settanni, Luca oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma 2022 Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV009139680 volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 40 2014 157-164 8 045F 630 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:40 year:2014 pages:157-164 extent:8 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Food model systems Indian mustard Aqueous extracts Antibacterial activity In situ activity Borage |
| dewey-raw |
630 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Miceli, Alessandro @@aut@@ Aleo, Aurora @@oth@@ Corona, Onofrio @@oth@@ Sardina, Maria T. @@oth@@ Mammina, Caterina @@oth@@ Settanni, Luca @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-sort |
3630 |
| id |
ELV022888136 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV022888136</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625140258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014016000018.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV022888136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miceli, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Food model systems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indian mustard</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aqueous extracts</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antibacterial activity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">In situ activity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Borage</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aleo, Aurora</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corona, Onofrio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sardina, Maria T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mammina, Caterina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Settanni, Luca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:157-164</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">157-164</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Miceli, Alessandro |
| spellingShingle |
Miceli, Alessandro ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| authorStr |
Miceli, Alessandro |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
630 - Agriculture & related technologies 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage |
| topic_browse |
ddc 630 ddc 640 ddc 610 Elsevier Food model systems Elsevier Indian mustard Elsevier Aqueous extracts Elsevier Antibacterial activity Elsevier In situ activity Elsevier Borage |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
a a aa o c oc m t s mt mts c m cm l s ls |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV009139680 |
| dewey-tens |
630 - Agriculture 640 - Home & family management 610 - Medicine & health |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV009139680 |
| title |
Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV022888136 (ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5 |
| title_full |
Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| author_sort |
Miceli, Alessandro |
| journal |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| journalStr |
Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
157 |
| author_browse |
Miceli, Alessandro |
| container_volume |
40 |
| physical |
8 |
| class |
630 640 630 DE-600 640 DE-600 610 VZ |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Miceli, Alessandro |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |
| dewey-full |
630 640 610 |
| title_sort |
antibacterial activity of borago officinalis and brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| title_auth |
Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| abstract |
The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... |
| abstractGer |
The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff... |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
| title_short |
Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Aleo, Aurora Corona, Onofrio Sardina, Maria T. Mammina, Caterina Settanni, Luca |
| author2Str |
Aleo, Aurora Corona, Onofrio Sardina, Maria T. Mammina, Caterina Settanni, Luca |
| ppnlink |
ELV009139680 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T17:25:34.527Z |
| _version_ |
1803851382946529280 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV022888136</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625140258.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2014016000018.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV022888136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0956-7135(13)00638-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="a">640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">630</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">640</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">610</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Miceli, Alessandro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antibacterial activity of Borago officinalis and Brassica juncea aqueous extracts evaluated in vitro and in situ using different food model systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The present study was undertaken to characterize the antibacterial activity of the aqueous extracts (AEs) obtained from the leaves of Borago officinalis L. and Brassica juncea L. The antagonistic activity was evaluated against several bacteria (42 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 35 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 38 strains of Enterobacter spp. and 18 strains of Salmonella enterica) commonly associated with foodborne diseases by paper disc diffusion method. The susceptibility to the plant extracts was strain specific. Thirty-five strains (7 L. monocytogenes, 11 S. aureus, 1 S. Enteritidis, 1 S. Veneziana, 7 Enterobacter hormaechei, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter sakazakii and 2 Enterobacter amnigenus) were sensitive to both AEs. The activity of B. juncea AE towards the Gram-positive strains was generally higher than that observed for B. officinalis (45 and 22 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively), while an opposite trend was registered against the Gram-negative strains (22 and 35 strains inhibited by B. juncea and B. officinalis, respectively). The highest inhibition was displayed by B. juncea AE against E. sakazakii 23A. B. officinalis AE showed the same minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (10 mg/mL) for the majority of the most sensitive strains, while the MIC of B. juncea AE was different for each bacterial species and the lowest concentration was registered to inhibit enterobacteria (3.1 mg/mL). After 1-year storage in different thermal conditions (room temperature, 4 °C and −20 °C), both AEs lost their inhibitory power. The extracts did not show cellular toxicity when tested against sheep erythrocytes. Hence, B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs were effective as natural antibacterial substances. AEs were tested in situ in three food model systems (meat, fish and vegetable) at two concentrations, but only when added at a concentration 10-fold higher than that showing definite efficacy in vitro (100 and 31 mg/mL for B. officinalis and B. juncea, respectively), they inhibited the growth of the sensitive strains, even though the cells were still viable after 24 h. The influence of AEs on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) composition of the food models was analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The different levels of alcohols, aldehydes, esters, hydrocarbons, ketones and phenol registered, showed a consistent effect of B. officinalis and B. juncea AEs on the VOCs of the food models. However, the sniff...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Food model systems</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indian mustard</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aqueous extracts</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Antibacterial activity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">In situ activity</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Borage</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aleo, Aurora</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Corona, Onofrio</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sardina, Maria T.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mammina, Caterina</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Settanni, Luca</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Tanaka, Hajime ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Defining Tumour Shape Irregularity for Preoperative Risk Stratification of Clinically Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma</subfield><subfield code="d">2022</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV009139680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:40</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:157-164</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.006</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">40</subfield><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="h">157-164</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">630</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3990707 |