Perforated peptic ulcer
Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Søreide, Kjetil [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Umfang: |
11 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches - Dou, Chao ELSEVIER, 2013, London [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:386 ; year:2015 ; number:10000 ; day:26 ; month:09 ; pages:1288-1298 ; extent:11 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV023239735 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV023239735 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625141005.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000638.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV023239735 | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 38.38 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 56.20 |2 bkl | ||
| 084 | |a 56.11 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Søreide, Kjetil |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perforated peptic ulcer |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 11 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. | ||
| 520 | |a Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Thorsen, Kenneth |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Harrison, Ewen M |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bingener, Juliane |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Møller, Morten H |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ohene-Yeboah, Michael |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Søreide, Jon Arne |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Dou, Chao ELSEVIER |t Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |d 2013 |g London [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:386 |g year:2015 |g number:10000 |g day:26 |g month:09 |g pages:1288-1298 |g extent:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OPC-GEO | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 38.38 |j Seismologie |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.20 |j Ingenieurgeologie |j Bodenmechanik |q VZ |
| 936 | b | k | |a 56.11 |j Baukonstruktion |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 386 |j 2015 |e 10000 |b 26 |c 0926 |h 1288-1298 |g 11 | ||
| author_variant |
k s ks |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
sreidekjetilthorsenkennethharrisonewenmb:2015----:efrtdet |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
38.38 56.20 56.11 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 doi GBV00000000000638.pica (DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Søreide, Kjetil verfasserin aut Perforated peptic ulcer 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Thorsen, Kenneth oth Harrison, Ewen M oth Bingener, Juliane oth Møller, Morten H oth Ohene-Yeboah, Michael oth Søreide, Jon Arne oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 386 2015 10000 26 0926 1288-1298 11 |
| spelling |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 doi GBV00000000000638.pica (DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Søreide, Kjetil verfasserin aut Perforated peptic ulcer 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Thorsen, Kenneth oth Harrison, Ewen M oth Bingener, Juliane oth Møller, Morten H oth Ohene-Yeboah, Michael oth Søreide, Jon Arne oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 386 2015 10000 26 0926 1288-1298 11 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 doi GBV00000000000638.pica (DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Søreide, Kjetil verfasserin aut Perforated peptic ulcer 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Thorsen, Kenneth oth Harrison, Ewen M oth Bingener, Juliane oth Møller, Morten H oth Ohene-Yeboah, Michael oth Søreide, Jon Arne oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 386 2015 10000 26 0926 1288-1298 11 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 doi GBV00000000000638.pica (DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Søreide, Kjetil verfasserin aut Perforated peptic ulcer 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Thorsen, Kenneth oth Harrison, Ewen M oth Bingener, Juliane oth Møller, Morten H oth Ohene-Yeboah, Michael oth Søreide, Jon Arne oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 386 2015 10000 26 0926 1288-1298 11 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 doi GBV00000000000638.pica (DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Søreide, Kjetil verfasserin aut Perforated peptic ulcer 2015transfer abstract 11 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. Thorsen, Kenneth oth Harrison, Ewen M oth Bingener, Juliane oth Møller, Morten H oth Ohene-Yeboah, Michael oth Søreide, Jon Arne oth Enthalten in Elsevier Dou, Chao ELSEVIER Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches 2013 London [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV007685041 volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO 38.38 Seismologie VZ 56.20 Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik VZ 56.11 Baukonstruktion VZ AR 386 2015 10000 26 0926 1288-1298 11 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches London [u.a.] volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches London [u.a.] volume:386 year:2015 number:10000 day:26 month:09 pages:1288-1298 extent:11 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Seismologie Ingenieurgeologie Bodenmechanik Baukonstruktion |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| dewey-raw |
690 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Søreide, Kjetil @@aut@@ Thorsen, Kenneth @@oth@@ Harrison, Ewen M @@oth@@ Bingener, Juliane @@oth@@ Møller, Morten H @@oth@@ Ohene-Yeboah, Michael @@oth@@ Søreide, Jon Arne @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-26T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV007685041 |
| dewey-sort |
3690 |
| id |
ELV023239735 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023239735</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000638.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023239735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Søreide, Kjetil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thorsen, Kenneth</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harrison, Ewen M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bingener, Juliane</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Møller, Morten H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ohene-Yeboah, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Søreide, Jon Arne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dou, Chao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">London [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007685041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:386</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10000</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1288-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">386</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">10000</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">0926</subfield><subfield code="h">1288-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Søreide, Kjetil |
| spellingShingle |
Søreide, Kjetil ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 Perforated peptic ulcer |
| authorStr |
Søreide, Kjetil |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl Perforated peptic ulcer |
| topic |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| topic_browse |
ddc 690 bkl 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
k t kt e m h em emh j b jb m h m mh mhm m o y moy j a s ja jas |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV007685041 |
| dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV007685041 |
| title |
Perforated peptic ulcer |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV023239735 (ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |
| title_full |
Perforated peptic ulcer |
| author_sort |
Søreide, Kjetil |
| journal |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| journalStr |
Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
1288 |
| author_browse |
Søreide, Kjetil |
| container_volume |
386 |
| physical |
11 |
| class |
690 VZ 38.38 bkl 56.20 bkl 56.11 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Søreide, Kjetil |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |
| dewey-full |
690 |
| title_sort |
perforated peptic ulcer |
| title_auth |
Perforated peptic ulcer |
| abstract |
Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. |
| abstractGer |
Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OPC-GEO |
| container_issue |
10000 |
| title_short |
Perforated peptic ulcer |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Thorsen, Kenneth Harrison, Ewen M Bingener, Juliane Møller, Morten H Ohene-Yeboah, Michael Søreide, Jon Arne |
| author2Str |
Thorsen, Kenneth Harrison, Ewen M Bingener, Juliane Møller, Morten H Ohene-Yeboah, Michael Søreide, Jon Arne |
| ppnlink |
ELV007685041 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T18:22:27.364Z |
| _version_ |
1803854961563402240 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023239735</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000638.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023239735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Søreide, Kjetil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perforated peptic ulcer is a common emergency condition worldwide, with associated mortality rates of up to 30%. A scarcity of high-quality studies about the condition limits the knowledge base for clinical decision making, but a few published randomised trials are available. Although Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are common causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist between countries, and mortality rates also vary. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation of such methods in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care bundles, and postoperative monitoring need further assessment. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed to provide better evidence. We summarise the evidence for perforated peptic ulcer management and identify directions for future clinical research.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Thorsen, Kenneth</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Harrison, Ewen M</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bingener, Juliane</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Møller, Morten H</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ohene-Yeboah, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Søreide, Jon Arne</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Dou, Chao ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Effects of shape functions on flexural–torsional buckling of fixed circular arches</subfield><subfield code="d">2013</subfield><subfield code="g">London [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV007685041</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:386</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:10000</subfield><subfield code="g">day:26</subfield><subfield code="g">month:09</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:1288-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OPC-GEO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">38.38</subfield><subfield code="j">Seismologie</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.20</subfield><subfield code="j">Ingenieurgeologie</subfield><subfield code="j">Bodenmechanik</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">56.11</subfield><subfield code="j">Baukonstruktion</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">386</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">10000</subfield><subfield code="b">26</subfield><subfield code="c">0926</subfield><subfield code="h">1288-1298</subfield><subfield code="g">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399164 |