Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement
From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulato...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Moussa, Sylla Naby [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Umfang: |
14 |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass - Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER, 2019, the international journal of minerals policy and economics, Amsterdam [u.a.] |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:46 ; year:2015 ; pages:113-126 ; extent:14 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
ELV02352586X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELV02352586X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230625141410.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBVA2015010000014.pica |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)ELV02352586X | ||
| 035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 330 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 330 |q DE-600 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 530 |a 620 |q VZ |
| 084 | |a 52.56 |2 bkl | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Moussa, Sylla Naby |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
| 300 | |a 14 | ||
| 336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). | ||
| 520 | |a From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Economic shortfalls |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Investment framework |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Tax rates optimization |2 Elsevier | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Taxes reform |2 Elsevier | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Deyi, Jiang |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Li |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier Science |a Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER |t Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |d 2019 |d the international journal of minerals policy and economics |g Amsterdam [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV003457176 |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2015 |g pages:113-126 |g extent:14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
| 936 | b | k | |a 52.56 |j Regenerative Energieformen |j alternative Energieformen |q VZ |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 46 |j 2015 |h 113-126 |g 14 | ||
| 953 | |2 045F |a 330 | ||
| author_variant |
s n m sn snm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
moussasyllanabydeyijianglinli:2015----:nlssfunanwiigicleieosdrt |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
| bklnumber |
52.56 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 doi GBVA2015010000014.pica (DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Moussa, Sylla Naby verfasserin aut Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier Deyi, Jiang oth Lin, Li oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass 2019 the international journal of minerals policy and economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003457176 volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 46 2015 113-126 14 045F 330 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 doi GBVA2015010000014.pica (DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Moussa, Sylla Naby verfasserin aut Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier Deyi, Jiang oth Lin, Li oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass 2019 the international journal of minerals policy and economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003457176 volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 46 2015 113-126 14 045F 330 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 doi GBVA2015010000014.pica (DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Moussa, Sylla Naby verfasserin aut Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier Deyi, Jiang oth Lin, Li oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass 2019 the international journal of minerals policy and economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003457176 volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 46 2015 113-126 14 045F 330 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 doi GBVA2015010000014.pica (DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Moussa, Sylla Naby verfasserin aut Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier Deyi, Jiang oth Lin, Li oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass 2019 the international journal of minerals policy and economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003457176 volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 46 2015 113-126 14 045F 330 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 doi GBVA2015010000014.pica (DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Moussa, Sylla Naby verfasserin aut Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement 2015transfer abstract 14 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier Deyi, Jiang oth Lin, Li oth Enthalten in Elsevier Science Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass 2019 the international journal of minerals policy and economics Amsterdam [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV003457176 volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U 52.56 Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen VZ AR 46 2015 113-126 14 045F 330 |
| language |
English |
| source |
Enthalten in Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 |
| sourceStr |
Enthalten in Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass Amsterdam [u.a.] volume:46 year:2015 pages:113-126 extent:14 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| bklname |
Regenerative Energieformen alternative Energieformen |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Economic shortfalls Investment framework Tax rates optimization Taxes reform |
| dewey-raw |
330 |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
| container_title |
Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Moussa, Sylla Naby @@aut@@ Deyi, Jiang @@oth@@ Lin, Li @@oth@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
ELV003457176 |
| dewey-sort |
3330 |
| id |
ELV02352586X |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02352586X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141410.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015010000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02352586X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moussa, Sylla Naby</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Economic shortfalls</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Investment framework</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tax rates optimization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Taxes reform</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deyi, Jiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lin, Li</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of minerals policy and economics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003457176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-126</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="j">Regenerative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="j">alternative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">113-126</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Moussa, Sylla Naby |
| spellingShingle |
Moussa, Sylla Naby ddc 330 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| authorStr |
Moussa, Sylla Naby |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV003457176 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| dewey-ones |
330 - Economics 530 - Physics 620 - Engineering & allied operations |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
elsevier |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| topic_title |
330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform Elsevier |
| topic |
ddc 330 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform |
| topic_unstemmed |
ddc 330 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform |
| topic_browse |
ddc 330 ddc 530 bkl 52.56 Elsevier Economic shortfalls Elsevier Investment framework Elsevier Tax rates optimization Elsevier Taxes reform |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
| author2_variant |
j d jd l l ll |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV003457176 |
| dewey-tens |
330 - Economics 530 - Physics 620 - Engineering |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV003457176 |
| title |
Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV02352586X (ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1 |
| title_full |
Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| author_sort |
Moussa, Sylla Naby |
| journal |
Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |
| journalStr |
Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
false |
| dewey-hundreds |
300 - Social sciences 500 - Science 600 - Technology |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
| container_start_page |
113 |
| author_browse |
Moussa, Sylla Naby |
| container_volume |
46 |
| physical |
14 |
| class |
330 330 DE-600 530 620 VZ 52.56 bkl |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Moussa, Sylla Naby |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |
| dewey-full |
330 530 620 |
| title_sort |
analysis of guinean new mining fiscal regime: considerations for improvement |
| title_auth |
Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| abstract |
From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). |
| abstractGer |
From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). |
| abstract_unstemmed |
From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013). |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U |
| title_short |
Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Deyi, Jiang Lin, Li |
| author2Str |
Deyi, Jiang Lin, Li |
| ppnlink |
ELV003457176 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
z |
| isOA_txt |
false |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| author2_role |
oth oth |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007 |
| up_date |
2024-07-06T19:05:44.391Z |
| _version_ |
1803857684744634368 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV02352586X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141410.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBVA2015010000014.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV02352586X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0301-4207(15)00050-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">330</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">530</subfield><subfield code="a">620</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="2">bkl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moussa, Sylla Naby</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Analysis of Guinean new mining fiscal regime: Considerations for improvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From 1990s the mining regulatory and legal framework that supported great harmonization and stability in Africa mining sector has not fully contributed in creating more opportunities of foreign investments. 2 2 Many authors have conducted the study on African resources-rich countries mining regulatory and legal framework with objective of creating more opportunities of foreign investments, but the external origin of the reform process responsible for the new regulatory frameworks over the last 20 years has had other far-reaching implications of governance to rich the goal. This has been demonstrated in numerous articles such as Campbell (2002) (Regulating Mining in Africa: for Whose Benefit? corporate strategies and government policies in the international diamond industries), Otto (2002) (Investing for sustainability: the management of mineral wealth) and Sakala (2012) (Africa: Experts to Review Africa's Tax Incentives) and so on. In line with this aforementioned Guinea adopted a new mining code in September 2011 which replaced the mining code of 1995. This study sheds light on some of the central issues in the continuing process of mining legislation revision, the short term optimization of mining taxes and incentives attractiveness so as to illustrate their effects on both government revenues and returns on investment. Through a quantitative comparison of the tax rates in the context of developed and developing resources-rich countries, it can be concluded that the past regulatory frameworks are uncompetitive in terms of foreign investments' attraction. The new regulation code itself has some negative impacts on the previous investments, as well as bringing down living standards in areas of critical importance for socio-economic development. 3 3 The adoption of new mining code coincided with the economic crisis of some operating companies in Guinea such as BHP Billiton, Rusal Alumina and Rio Tinto who were ready to slow some of their worldwide investments with mineral exploration projects. One of the immediate consequences was, some of those companies stopped operations by fearing that falling mineral commodity and government intervention could precipitate massive investment losses. This generated the decrease of numerous relative economic activities including direct and indirect jobs (see Revenue Watch Institute (2013).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Economic shortfalls</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Investment framework</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tax rates optimization</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Taxes reform</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deyi, Jiang</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lin, Li</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier Science</subfield><subfield code="a">Gong, Zhiqiang ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Catalytic pyrolysis of chemical extraction residue from microalgae biomass</subfield><subfield code="d">2019</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of minerals policy and economics</subfield><subfield code="g">Amsterdam [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV003457176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:46</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:113-126</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.04.007</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="936" ind1="b" ind2="k"><subfield code="a">52.56</subfield><subfield code="j">Regenerative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="j">alternative Energieformen</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">46</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">113-126</subfield><subfield code="g">14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">330</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3975964 |