Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations
Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly u...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Wells, Ellen M. [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015transfer abstract |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Umfang: |
8 |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
Enthalten in: Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A - Li, Huilin ELSEVIER, 2018, the international journal of building science and its applications, New York, NY [u.a.] |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:93 ; year:2015 ; pages:331-338 ; extent:8 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
ELV023615125 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ELV023615125 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230625141504.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a GBV00000000000145A.pica |
035 | |a (DE-627)ELV023615125 | ||
035 | |a (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | |a 690 | |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 690 |q DE-600 |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 570 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Wells, Ellen M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
264 | 1 | |c 2015transfer abstract | |
300 | |a 8 | ||
336 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zzz |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b z |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a nicht spezifiziert |b zu |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. | ||
520 | |a Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. | ||
650 | 7 | |a Conservation of energy resources |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Thermal comfort |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Carbon dioxide |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Volatile organic hydrocarbons |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Ventilation |2 Elsevier | |
650 | 7 | |a Indoor air pollution |2 Elsevier | |
700 | 1 | |a Berges, Matt |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Metcalf, Mandy |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Kinsella, Audrey |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Foreman, Kimberly |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dearborn, Dorr G. |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Greenberg, Stuart |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |n Elsevier |a Li, Huilin ELSEVIER |t Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |d 2018 |d the international journal of building science and its applications |g New York, NY [u.a.] |w (DE-627)ELV000477206 |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:93 |g year:2015 |g pages:331-338 |g extent:8 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a GBV_ELV | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_U | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 93 |j 2015 |h 331-338 |g 8 | ||
953 | |2 045F |a 690 |
author_variant |
e m w em emw |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
wellsellenmbergesmattmetcalfmandykinsell:2015----:noriqaiynocpncmotnoewtdevrucnetoae |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015transfer abstract |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 doi GBV00000000000145A.pica (DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Wells, Ellen M. verfasserin aut Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier Berges, Matt oth Metcalf, Mandy oth Kinsella, Audrey oth Foreman, Kimberly oth Dearborn, Dorr G. oth Greenberg, Stuart oth Enthalten in Elsevier Li, Huilin ELSEVIER Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A 2018 the international journal of building science and its applications New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000477206 volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 93 2015 331-338 8 045F 690 |
spelling |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 doi GBV00000000000145A.pica (DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Wells, Ellen M. verfasserin aut Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier Berges, Matt oth Metcalf, Mandy oth Kinsella, Audrey oth Foreman, Kimberly oth Dearborn, Dorr G. oth Greenberg, Stuart oth Enthalten in Elsevier Li, Huilin ELSEVIER Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A 2018 the international journal of building science and its applications New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000477206 volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 93 2015 331-338 8 045F 690 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 doi GBV00000000000145A.pica (DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Wells, Ellen M. verfasserin aut Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier Berges, Matt oth Metcalf, Mandy oth Kinsella, Audrey oth Foreman, Kimberly oth Dearborn, Dorr G. oth Greenberg, Stuart oth Enthalten in Elsevier Li, Huilin ELSEVIER Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A 2018 the international journal of building science and its applications New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000477206 volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 93 2015 331-338 8 045F 690 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 doi GBV00000000000145A.pica (DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Wells, Ellen M. verfasserin aut Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier Berges, Matt oth Metcalf, Mandy oth Kinsella, Audrey oth Foreman, Kimberly oth Dearborn, Dorr G. oth Greenberg, Stuart oth Enthalten in Elsevier Li, Huilin ELSEVIER Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A 2018 the international journal of building science and its applications New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000477206 volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 93 2015 331-338 8 045F 690 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 doi GBV00000000000145A.pica (DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng 690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Wells, Ellen M. verfasserin aut Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations 2015transfer abstract 8 nicht spezifiziert zzz rdacontent nicht spezifiziert z rdamedia nicht spezifiziert zu rdacarrier Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier Berges, Matt oth Metcalf, Mandy oth Kinsella, Audrey oth Foreman, Kimberly oth Dearborn, Dorr G. oth Greenberg, Stuart oth Enthalten in Elsevier Li, Huilin ELSEVIER Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A 2018 the international journal of building science and its applications New York, NY [u.a.] (DE-627)ELV000477206 volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 Volltext GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA AR 93 2015 331-338 8 045F 690 |
language |
English |
source |
Enthalten in Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A New York, NY [u.a.] volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 |
sourceStr |
Enthalten in Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A New York, NY [u.a.] volume:93 year:2015 pages:331-338 extent:8 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Conservation of energy resources Thermal comfort Carbon dioxide Volatile organic hydrocarbons Ventilation Indoor air pollution |
dewey-raw |
690 |
isfreeaccess_bool |
false |
container_title |
Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Wells, Ellen M. @@aut@@ Berges, Matt @@oth@@ Metcalf, Mandy @@oth@@ Kinsella, Audrey @@oth@@ Foreman, Kimberly @@oth@@ Dearborn, Dorr G. @@oth@@ Greenberg, Stuart @@oth@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
ELV000477206 |
dewey-sort |
3690 |
id |
ELV023615125 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023615125</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141504.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000145A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023615125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wells, Ellen M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conservation of energy resources</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal comfort</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon dioxide</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Volatile organic hydrocarbons</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ventilation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indoor air pollution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berges, Matt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metcalf, Mandy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kinsella, Audrey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, Kimberly</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dearborn, Dorr G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greenberg, Stuart</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Huilin ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of building science and its applications</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000477206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:93</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:331-338</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">93</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">331-338</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
author |
Wells, Ellen M. |
spellingShingle |
Wells, Ellen M. ddc 690 ddc 570 Elsevier Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
authorStr |
Wells, Ellen M. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)ELV000477206 |
format |
electronic Article |
dewey-ones |
690 - Buildings 570 - Life sciences; biology |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
elsevier |
remote_str |
true |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
topic_title |
690 690 DE-600 570 VZ Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution Elsevier |
topic |
ddc 690 ddc 570 Elsevier Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution |
topic_unstemmed |
ddc 690 ddc 570 Elsevier Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution |
topic_browse |
ddc 690 ddc 570 Elsevier Conservation of energy resources Elsevier Thermal comfort Elsevier Carbon dioxide Elsevier Volatile organic hydrocarbons Elsevier Ventilation Elsevier Indoor air pollution |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
zu |
author2_variant |
m b mb m m mm a k ak k f kf d g d dg dgd s g sg |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |
hierarchy_parent_id |
ELV000477206 |
dewey-tens |
690 - Building & construction 570 - Life sciences; biology |
hierarchy_top_title |
Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |
isfreeaccess_txt |
false |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)ELV000477206 |
title |
Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)ELV023615125 (ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4 |
title_full |
Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
author_sort |
Wells, Ellen M. |
journal |
Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |
journalStr |
Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
false |
dewey-hundreds |
600 - Technology 500 - Science |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
zzz |
container_start_page |
331 |
author_browse |
Wells, Ellen M. |
container_volume |
93 |
physical |
8 |
class |
690 690 DE-600 570 VZ |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Wells, Ellen M. |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |
dewey-full |
690 570 |
title_sort |
indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
title_auth |
Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
abstract |
Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. |
abstractGer |
Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_U GBV_ELV SYSFLAG_U SSG-OLC-PHA |
title_short |
Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Berges, Matt Metcalf, Mandy Kinsella, Audrey Foreman, Kimberly Dearborn, Dorr G. Greenberg, Stuart |
author2Str |
Berges, Matt Metcalf, Mandy Kinsella, Audrey Foreman, Kimberly Dearborn, Dorr G. Greenberg, Stuart |
ppnlink |
ELV000477206 |
mediatype_str_mv |
z |
isOA_txt |
false |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
author2_role |
oth oth oth oth oth oth |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021 |
up_date |
2024-07-06T19:18:34.683Z |
_version_ |
1803858492453289984 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">ELV023615125</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230625141504.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">180603s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">GBV00000000000145A.pica</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)ELV023615125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ELSEVIER)S0360-1323(15)30035-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">690</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">570</subfield><subfield code="q">VZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wells, Ellen M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indoor air quality and occupant comfort in homes with deep versus conventional energy efficiency renovations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015transfer abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zzz</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">z</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">nicht spezifiziert</subfield><subfield code="b">zu</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deep energy retrofits (DER) for residential housing have been proposed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; these result in ∼50% additional energy efficiency compared to standard, energy star (ES), renovations. However, the impact of increased energy efficiency on indoor air quality (IAQ) is poorly understood. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare IAQ and occupant comfort in 12 low income single-family homes renovated to a DER or ES standard. Quarterly visits were conducted for a median of 18 months post-renovation; IAQ was assessed in 4 rooms per visit for a total of 237 measurements. Multivariable regression models accounted for repeated measurements and controlled for house- and family-related covariates. In fully adjusted models, average difference (95% confidence interval) in IAQ parameters in DER homes versus ES homes were: temperature: −0.3 °C (−1.2, 0.6); relative humidity: 0.4% (−1.1, 1.8); carbon dioxide: 43.7 ppm (−18.8, 106.2); and total volatile organic compounds: 198 ppb (−224, 620). Residents in DER homes were significantly less likely to report their homes were comfortable, most likely due to initial difficulties with new heating system technology. We found no differences in IAQ between DER and ES homes; however, education is strongly recommended when incorporating new technology into residences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Conservation of energy resources</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thermal comfort</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Carbon dioxide</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Volatile organic hydrocarbons</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ventilation</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indoor air pollution</subfield><subfield code="2">Elsevier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Berges, Matt</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metcalf, Mandy</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kinsella, Audrey</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Foreman, Kimberly</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dearborn, Dorr G.</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greenberg, Stuart</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Enthalten in</subfield><subfield code="n">Elsevier</subfield><subfield code="a">Li, Huilin ELSEVIER</subfield><subfield code="t">Integration-free reprogramming of human umbilical arterial endothelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells IHSTMi001-A</subfield><subfield code="d">2018</subfield><subfield code="d">the international journal of building science and its applications</subfield><subfield code="g">New York, NY [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)ELV000477206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:93</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:331-338</subfield><subfield code="g">extent:8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.021</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ELV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_U</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">93</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="h">331-338</subfield><subfield code="g">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="953" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="2">045F</subfield><subfield code="a">690</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3998156 |